Hey!
I have set up clamav, and I think it works
But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then
clamav. Thats all fine.
But when clamav is done, rspamd scans it again.
My setup is debian, postfix, rspamd, clamav, dovecot.
Most of the setup from https://workaround.org/isp
On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Hey!
I have set up clamav, and I think it works
But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then
clamav. Thats all fine.
But when clamav is done, rspamd scans it again.
you are using amavis as content filte
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
> Hey!
>
> I have set up clamav, and I think it works
> But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then
> clamav. Thats all fine.
> But when clamav is done, rspamd scans it again.
> My setup is debian, postfix, rspamd, clamav, dovecot.
>
On 09-09-2024 13:46, chandan via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Hey!
I have set up clamav, and I think it works
But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and then
clamav. Thats all fine.
But when clamav is done, rspamd
hey,
not sure about your setup, but rspamd can also check email with clamav [1].
that way, there is no need to add clamav to postfix (as content_filter
or milter).
d.
[1] https://rspamd.com/doc/modules/antivirus.html
Στις 9/9/24 13:53, ο/η Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users έγραψε:
I hav
Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users:
>
> On 09-09-2024 13:46, chandan via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On 2024-09-09 10:53, Danjel Jungersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> >> Hey!
> >>
> >> I have set up clamav, and I think it works
> >> But when a mail is recieved, it is first scanned by rspamd and th
I got the attached report about a double bounce from my incoming postfix
server "Postfix SMTP server: errors from
nullbounce.com[116.202.14.127]:57394" . When I realize that this error
is totally bogus, I want to blackhole that whole netblock. I see a
double bounce, my heart jumps, I'm thinking
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Thomas M?rbauer via Postfix-users:
> > >That's rather different than what you appeared to say. Here there's
> > >folding whitespace *before* (not in the middle of) the Message-ID.
> > Sorry, could have been more clear about that. The folding can only
> > occur a
On Mon, Sep 09, 2024 at 05:14:07PM +0200, Håkon Alstadheim via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I got the attached report about a double bounce from my incoming postfix
> server "Postfix SMTP server: errors from
> nullbounce.com[116.202.14.127]:57394".
This wasn't a double-bounce, just an invalid SMTP rec
