> My doubt is that since the outgoing email server identifies itself as
> host1.example.com in the EHLO, is there a requirement or even an
> expectation that postmas...@example.com will be able to receive email.
I think the reality is that we are in 2024, and the chances of a human reading
p
* Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
> Is this an unexpanded virtual alias?
Yes
> The 'redirect' recipient is not subject
> to canonical mapping, masquerading, or virtual alias mapping.
That explains it.
> There were two recipients: the BCC recipient that was found in
> recipient_bcc_maps, and
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 01:10:46PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> > > Now I tried to redirect mails from my private address sent to anybody
> > > at charite.de to be redirected to someone else in the organisation,
> > > like this:
> > >
> > > rxlf.hildebra...@gmail.com REDIRECT t
On 01/08/2024 09:32, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
My doubt is that since the outgoing email server identifies itself as
host1.example.com in the EHLO, is there a requirement or even an
expectation that postmas...@example.com will be able to receive email.
I think the reality is tha
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 07:32:52AM +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users wrote:
> I think the reality is that we are in 2024, and the chances of a human
> reading postmaster@ are about the same as a human reading abuse@
> i.e. nil.
This may be true for the too-big-to-fail mail providers, but
* Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users :
> Making REDIRECT match naïve user expectations,
ey! :)
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT | Abteilung Netz | Netzwerk-Administration
Invalidenstraße 120/121 | D-10115 Berlin
Tel. +49 30 450 570 155 | Fax: +49 30 450 570 962
ralf.hildebra...@ch
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users:
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 01:10:46PM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > > > Now I tried to redirect mails from my private address sent to anybody
> > > > at charite.de to be redirected to someone else in the organisation,
> > > > like this:
>
On 2024-08-01 at 03:32:52 UTC-0400 (Thu, 01 Aug 2024 07:32:52 +)
Laura Smith via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
My doubt is that since the outgoing email server identifies itself as
host1.example.com in the EHLO, is there a requirement or even an
expectation that postmas...@example.
I concur. My domain is a personal one for the use of me and my family. As such,
there should not be an issue with other users sending spam or the like which
would trigger mail to postmaster or abuse so the mail to those addresses is
miniscule. And internally, they’re just forwarding addresses to
ceturtd., 2024. g. 1. aug., plkst. 09:10 — lietotājs Wietse Venema via
Postfix-users () rakstīja:
>
> Davis Mosans via Postfix-users:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to setup Postfix in a way that will forward/relay all mail
> > on SMTP port 25 but send out (don't forward) email when receiving on
> > su
ceturtd., 2024. g. 1. aug., plkst. 14:10 — lietotājs Viktor Dukhovni
via Postfix-users () rakstīja:
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 12:54:16AM +0300, Dāvis Mosāns via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > and in master.cf I have:
> > submissions inet n - n - - smtpd
> >-o
El jue, 01-08-2024 a las 07:32 +, Laura Smith via Postfix-users
escribió:
>
>
>
> > My doubt is that since the outgoing email server identifies itself as
> > host1.example.com in the EHLO, is there a requirement or even an
> > expectation that postmas...@example.com will be able to receive e
Bill Cole via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-08-01 16:33:
OMG, I am apparently non-human...
Mail systems and their rates of abuse and/or technical trouble vary
greatly.
Yes, score=5.773 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[AUTHRES_ARC_NONE=0.5, AUTHRES_DKIM_FAIL=0.5,
AUTHRES_DMARC_NONE=1.5, DK
On Jul 31, 2024, at 1:19 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
wrote:
>
> FYI Mailman 2 claims to rewrite From: header to fullfill DMARC requirements
> only when DMARC policy is "quarantine" or "reject"
That's the "dmarc_moderation_action" option in the "Sender filters" section of
the
Im sure the answer is NO, but you don't know if you don't ask.
Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking the
milters during the rcpt-to stage?
My end goal is trying to track the email, so logic in the milter during the
rcpt-to stage can have a header added later in th
Robert L Mathews via Postfix-users wrote in
:
|On Jul 31, 2024, at 1:19 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users \
| wrote:
|> FYI Mailman 2 claims to rewrite From: header to fullfill DMARC requireme\
|> nts only when DMARC policy is "quarantine" or "reject"
|
|That's the "dmarc_moderati
On 2024-08-01 at 16:04:59 UTC-0400 (Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:04:59 -0400)
postfix--- via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Im sure the answer is NO, but you don't know if you don't ask.
You're wrong :)
Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking
the milters during t
Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking the
milters during the rcpt-to stage?
smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt = no
Thanks.
No wonder i couldn't find it by searching for Queue Id in the docs. I didn't
think to search for NOQUEUE.
___
Bill Cole via Postfix-users:
> On 2024-08-01 at 16:04:59 UTC-0400 (Thu, 01 Aug 2024 16:04:59 -0400)
> postfix--- via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Im sure the answer is NO, but you don't know if you don't ask.
>
> You're wrong :)
>
> > Is there anyway to get postfix to assign t
> Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking
> the milters during the rcpt-to stage?
smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt = no
Almost: the RCPT TO is valid AFTER the Milter accepts it.
Wietse
I don't understand what you mean by that.
I did a test, set the dela
postfix--- via Postfix-users:
> >> > Is there anyway to get postfix to assign the queueId before invoking
> >> > the milters during the rcpt-to stage?
> >>
> >> smtpd_delay_open_until_valid_rcpt = no
> >
> >
> > Almost: the RCPT TO is valid AFTER the Milter accepts it.
That is the case with "sm
D?vis Mos?ns via Postfix-users:
> ceturtd., 2024. g. 1. aug., plkst. 09:10 ? lietot?js Wietse Venema via
> Postfix-users () rakst?ja:
> >
> > Davis Mosans via Postfix-users:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm trying to setup Postfix in a way that will forward/relay all mail
> > > on SMTP port 25 but send ou
It appears that Laura Smith via Postfix-users
said:
>
>
>
>> My doubt is that since the outgoing email server identifies itself as
>> host1.example.com in the EHLO, is there a requirement or even an
>> expectation that postmas...@example.com will be able to receive email.
>
>
>I think the reality
23 matches
Mail list logo
