[pfx] Using postfwd for sasl auth clients only?

I have some simple postfwd rules that count the number of emails being sent per hour/day per sasl account (and reject once a limit is reached). I'm not sure how best to implement that though, Should I just have the following in master.cf? So if an account sent a CC to [n] addresses, the rules wou

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Hi ! OK this is in Work now :-) BTW: where to get the cert from to generate the 2 1 1 enty for DNS ? Ciao Gerd Am 26.06.24 um 12:56 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 11:26:59AM +0200, Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote: I checked my domain with posttls-fing

[pfx] Re: working simple config for cyrus SASL

On 26.06.24 16:29, John Levine via Postfix-users wrote: I'm trying to set up a little POP toaster on debian that has a few addreses all in virtual domains. I'm using Cyrus SASL (no Dovecot allowed for reasons) and to keep it simple, I'm using sasldb authentication. I can set up the sasldb with

[pfx] Re: Using postfwd for sasl auth clients only?

On 27.06.24 08:15, Gilgongo via Postfix-users wrote: I have some simple postfwd rules that count the number of emails being sent per hour/day per sasl account (and reject once a limit is reached). I'm not sure how best to implement that though, Should I just have the following in master.cf? So

[pfx] managing multi instances

Hi, I have two questions regarding multi instance management. 1. is there a way to batch migrate multi instances from serverA to serverB? We are planning to replace our servers and I'd spare as much manual work if possible. 2. is there an ad-hoc way to move mails between instances by their qu

[pfx] Re: managing multi instances

If you were using cloud VM There is a tech called live migration Under which you take no care on applications such as postfix. Hi, I have two questions regarding multi instance management. 1. is there a way to batch migrate multi instances from serverA to serverB? We are planning to replace

[pfx] Re: managing multi instances

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 10:45:09AM +, Gino Ferguson via Postfix-users wrote: > I have two questions regarding multi instance management. > > 1. is there a way to batch migrate multi instances from serverA to > serverB? We are planning to replace our servers and I'd spare as much > manual work

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

> BTW: where to get the cert from to generate the 2 1 1 enty for DNS ? - https://list.sys4.de/hyperkitty/list/dane-us...@list.sys4.de/message/ZTM3XQMI3XP7PWMWJTXBYDPVU4UENE24/ - https://dnssec-stats.ant.isi.edu/~viktor/x3hosts.html -- Viktor.

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Hi ! Thanx ! Works Ciao Gerd Am 27.06.24 um 13:29 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: BTW: where to get the cert from to generate the 2 1 1 enty for DNS ? -https://list.sys4.de/hyperkitty/list/dane-us...@list.sys4.de/message/ZTM3XQMI3XP7PWMWJTXBYDPVU4UENE24/ -https://dnssec-stat

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote: > Thanx ! Works Nope, sorry, you've rather failed to read and understand those docs. > Am 27.06.24 um 13:29 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: > > > BTW: where to get the cert from to generate the 2 1 1 enty f

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Hi ! I checked my cert and it related to R10 , but i will also publish the rest regarding you advice Ciao Gerd Am 27.06.24 um 14:24 schrieb Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users: On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 02:13:25PM +0200, Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote: Thanx ! Works Nope, sorry, you

[pfx] spf and Permerror

Hi I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay attention to What is a Permerror in SPF In log i get: Jun 27 15:09:11 MX policyd-spf[57158]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=84.205.190.72; helo=h2.3hosting.pl; envelope-from=gp

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote: > I checked my cert and it related to R10 , but i will also publish the rest > regarding you advice I do recommend investigating '3 1 1' records, instead. "Hence, my best advice is to not play Let's Encrypt whack-a-mole, and use "3 1 1" records with st

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Michael Grimm wrote: > [see Viktors link: http://dnssec-stats.ant.isi.edu/~viktor/x3hosts.html] > correction: http://dnssec-stats.ant.isi.edu/~viktor/x3hosts.html Regards, Michael ___ Postfix

[pfx] Re: spf and Permerror

On June 27, 2024 1:30:37 PM UTC, natan via Postfix-users wrote: >Hi >I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay >attention to > >What is a Permerror in SPF >In log i get: > >Jun 27 15:09:11 MX policyd-spf[57158]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror >(mailfrom) identit

[pfx] Re: spf and Permerror

W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze: On June 27, 2024 1:30:37 PM UTC, natan via Postfix-users wrote: Hi I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay attention to What is a Permerror in SPF In log i get: Jun 27 15:09:11 MX policyd-sp

[pfx] Re: spf and Permerror

W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:48, natan via Postfix-users pisze: W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze: On June 27, 2024 1:30:37 PM UTC, natan via Postfix-users wrote: Hi I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay attention to What is a Per

[pfx] Re: spf and Permerror

On 27.06.24 15:30, natan via Postfix-users wrote: I have a strange problem with SPF and I honestly don't know what to pay attention to What is a Permerror in SPF In log i get: Jun 27 15:09:11 MX policyd-spf[57158]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=84.205

[pfx] Re: spf and Permerror

natan via Postfix-users escribió el 27/06/2024 a las 15:48: W dniu 27.06.2024 o 15:39, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users pisze: Hi Scott Jun 27 15:39:06 MX policyd-spf[3729]: prepend Received-SPF: Permerror (mailfrom) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=200.28.23.150; helo=200-28-23-150.baf.movistar.cl

[pfx] Re: DANE and STS

Hi ! Sure...    i distribute 3 1 1 and 2 1 1 are onl for backup... I had the setup with R3 running for years w/o problems  but now i have also R11/12/13/14 as backup entries Ciao gerd Am 27.06.2024 um 15:34 schrieb Michael Grimm via Postfix-users: Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote: I c

[pfx] Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct configuration to use. Building a new server that in part is my postfix server and spent the last couple of days pulling my hair out trying to get it to deliver mail. I have an existing postfix server that has been working since 2014

[pfx] Re: Handing off via localhost:10025 to spamassassin for scanning failure

* Curtis J. Blank via Postfix-users: > I would like to get some insight as to the cause and correct > configuration to use. [...] Maybe it is simply too early in the morning for me to get your point, but what insight are you looking for, exactly? You already found out that localhost does not ne