[pfx] Re: DQS key in error responses

2024-06-23 Thread Cody Millard via Postfix-users
Check out this link showing a example postfix configuration. https://portal.spamhaus.com/dqs/#3.1.2 I found it to be very helpful in displaying the ranged syntax that spamhaus supports. On 6/22/2024 4:25 PM, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote: On 2024-06-22 at 16:58:26 UTC-0400 (Sat, 22 Jun 20

[pfx] how to implement this route

2024-06-23 Thread Jeff Peng via Postfix-users
Hello I saw gmx.de/web.de have a policy that, if the submission IP is not from DE/EU, messages will be routed to a different gateway which is listed in spamhaus already. Otherwise if submission client's IP is in DE/EU, messages will be routed out via the normal gateway whose IP is clean. How

[pfx] Re: DQS key in error responses

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Cody Millard via Postfix-users: > Check out this link showing a example postfix configuration. > > https://portal.spamhaus.com/dqs/#3.1.2 > > I found it to be very helpful in displaying the ranged syntax that > spamhaus supports. For a web page that does not require logging in, see: https://do

[pfx] Re: how to implement this route

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Jeff Peng via Postfix-users: > Hello > > I saw gmx.de/web.de have a policy that, if the submission IP is not from > DE/EU, messages will be routed to a different gateway which is listed in > spamhaus already. Otherwise if submission client's IP is in DE/EU, > messages will be routed out via the

[pfx] Re: DQS key in error responses

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > If you specify > > reject_rbl_client string-with-complex-syntax > > Then the rbl_reply_maps seach key will be that > string-with-complex-syntax. ... > Unlike rbl_reply_maps, postscreen strips the filter (and weight) > before searching the reply table. There a

[pfx] Re: how to implement this route

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > Jeff Peng via Postfix-users: > > Hello > > > > I saw gmx.de/web.de have a policy that, if the submission IP is not from > > DE/EU, messages will be routed to a different gateway which is listed in > > spamhaus already. Otherwise if submission client's IP is in

[pfx] Precision of time in Postfix log files

2024-06-23 Thread Peter Uetrecht via Postfix-users
Hello list, is the precision of time in Postfix log files (version 3.8.4) configurable (microseconds or milliseconds)? Thanks in advance Peter ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le..

[pfx] Re: No email forwarding?

2024-06-23 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-06-22 at 18:54:32 UTC-0400 (Sat, 22 Jun 2024 22:54:32 +) Jeff Pang via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: But google "why email forwarding is a bad idea" will get a lot of results. That is an extraordinarily poor measure of anything other than Google's indexing capability an

[pfx] Re: DQS key in error responses

2024-06-23 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-06-23 at 08:30:53 UTC-0400 (Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:30:53 -0400 (EDT)) Wietse Venema via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: >> If you specify >> >> reject_rbl_client string-with-complex-syntax >> >> Then the rbl_reply_maps seach key will be that >> s

[pfx] Re: Precision of time in Postfix log files

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Peter Uetrecht via Postfix-users: > Hello list, > > is the precision of time in Postfix log files (version 3.8.4) configurable > (microseconds or milliseconds)? Postfix does not generate the timestamp for logfiles written by syslogd or equivalent. That is done by the syslog(3) system library func

[pfx] Re: DQS key in error responses

2024-06-23 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Bill Cole via Postfix-users: > On 2024-06-23 at 08:30:53 UTC-0400 (Sun, 23 Jun 2024 08:30:53 -0400 (EDT)) > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users > is rumored to have said: > > > Wietse Venema via Postfix-users: > >> If you specify > >> > >> reject_rbl_client string-with-complex-syntax > >> > >> Th

[pfx] Re: No email forwarding?

2024-06-23 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 23.06.2024 o godz. 12:20:37 Bill Cole via Postfix-users pisze: > Transparent forwarding is infeasible of the modern net. Forwarding > using SRS or encapsulation is still usable if you are willing to > accept that those methods are imperfect and add complexity to a mail > system. > > Forwardin

[pfx] Re: No email forwarding?

2024-06-23 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-06-23 23:15: But nobody wants to implement this, they rather want to advise against forwarding. forwarding is not brokken, what is brokken is that srs is needed to solve another domains spf records ? no just stop fokus on dkim, and dmarc aligm

[pfx] Re: No email forwarding?

2024-06-23 Thread Bill Cole via Postfix-users
On 2024-06-23 at 17:15:33 UTC-0400 (Sun, 23 Jun 2024 23:15:33 +0200) Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users is rumored to have said: The forwarding issue is easily solvable. It's only the unwillingness of mainstream email providers to solve it. That implies a definition of "easily" that somehow inc

[pfx] Re: how to implement this route

2024-06-23 Thread Jeff Peng via Postfix-users
On 2024-06-23 20:24, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote: Jeff Peng via Postfix-users: Hello I saw gmx.de/web.de have a policy that, if the submission IP is not from DE/EU, messages will be routed to a different gateway which is listed in spamhaus already. Otherwise if submission client's

[pfx] inquiry for milter server

2024-06-23 Thread Jeff Peng via Postfix-users
what's the mainstream milter server for customized content analysis such as headers and languages? I may want to block some special messages which have a special header or special language (like middle-east). Thanks in advance. regards. ___ Postfix-u

[pfx] Re: sendmail -v add@ress hangs / postdrop calls read(0, … and waits forever

2024-06-23 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sun, Jun 23, 2024 at 06:06:40PM +, Дилян Палаузов wrote: > «sendmail -v myself@domain» however hangs. Of course it does, it is waiting to read the message headers and body from standard input as expected. > until I press Ctrl+C. This is Postfix 3.4.13. On Postfix 2.11 the > same command