On 5/06/24 16:20, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Original text:
Is there a link to the announcement online?
Peter
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
I do use spamhaus, spamcop, sorbs as rbl lists.
So I have to update the postscreen policy.
sorry to hear that and thanks Sorbs.
regards.
Naturally, if you're using SORBS as an RBL in postscreen, smtpd, or a content
filter (amavis, rspamd, ...)
___
On 5/06/24 19:23, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 5/06/24 16:20, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
Original text:
Is there a link to the announcement online?
I see it's from the mailop list which, unfortunately has the archives
set private so it doesn't help me to be able to link t
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
>- Create a wild-card SPF policy for *.raystedman.org that permits
>all your SMTP client IP addresses.
Sorry: wildcard in DNS only applied for non-existing names and since
the hostname already exists:
On 04.06.24 13:02, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Hi Viktor,
I'm not questioning the veracity of this, but equally I'm not sure I can
justify turning off one of our more important RLBs just on the strength of
an email on this list.
It would be good to have something from Proofpoint about the closure to
refer to if possible. Google isn't coming u
Hello Michelle :)
Would it be possible to move that sorbs service to another place to see
it continue its job ?
Thanks for the hard work anyway :)
Best regards,
Jeff
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an
Le 05/06/2024 à 14:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users a écrit :
Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users:
>- Create a wild-card SPF policy for *.raystedman.org that permits
>all your SMTP client IP addresses.
Sorry: wildcard in DNS only applied for non-existing names and since
the hos
Le 05/06/2024 à 14:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users a écrit :
What I mean is: wildcard TXT (SPF) record for
*.single-wild.porcupine.org only applies to wildcarded hosts, not to
any other record explicitly defined in single-wild.porcupine.org
zone.
Thus, when A record for mail01-t1
Le 05/06/2024 à 15:58, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users a écrit :
Le 05/06/2024 à 14:01, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users a
écrit :
What I mean is: wildcard TXT (SPF) record for
*.single-wild.porcupine.org only applies to wildcarded hosts, not to
any other record explicitly defi
On 2024-06-05 at 08:19:20 UTC-0400 (Wed, 5 Jun 2024 13:19:20 +0100)
Gilgongo via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
> Hi Viktor,
>
> I'm not questioning the veracity of this, but equally I'm not sure I can
> justify turning off one of our more important RLBs just on the strength of
> an email
* Bill Cole via Postfix-users [05/06/2024 12:33] :
>
> Others have said elsewhere that she posted it to her LinkedIn account
> as well, which you may be able to confirm.
https://www.linkedin.com/feed/update/urn:li:activity:7202108788026335233/
Emmanuel
I have noticed in most deliveries, servers are issuing two ehlo commands. For
example:
postfix/smtpd[232271]: disconnect from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.105.223]
ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=7
Is this an indication that something might not be configured correctly to c
* postfix--- via Postfix-users :
> I have noticed in most deliveries, servers are issuing two ehlo commands. For
> example:
>
> postfix/smtpd[232271]: disconnect from talvi.dovecot.org[94.237.105.223]
> ehlo=2 starttls=1 mail=1 rcpt=1 data=1 quit=1 commands=7
One EHLO before STARTTLS and one
13 matches
Mail list logo
