On 5/28/24 10:15 PM, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
On 5/28/24 10:11 PM, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:58:31AM +1000, Viktor Dukhovni via
Postfix-users wrote:
You might in fact want to reject XBL IPs early, before they even
attempt authentication.
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:26:10AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> > > The wrapper-mode TLS "smtps" rejects are naturally after the TLS
> > > handshake.
> > >
> >
> > 465 inet n - n - - smtpd
> > -o smtpd_delay_reject=no
> > -o
On 2024-05-28 at 20:25:14 UTC-0400 (Wed, 29 May 2024 02:25:14 +0200)
John Fawcett via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
On 29/05/2024 01:11, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
On 2024-05-28 at 18:50:11 UTC-0400 (Wed, 29 May 2024 00:50:11 +0200)
John Fawcett via Postfix-users
is rumored t
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-05-29 14:07:
Perhaps a bit of luck? For me, the XBL only catches around 10% of the
SASL probes. May your luck hold up.
https://www.abuseipdb.com/user/139902 enless tryes :)
all zen.spamhaus.org should be used as authbl, but not pbl 127.0.0.10
On 5/29/24 8:31 AM, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-05-29 14:07:
Perhaps a bit of luck? For me, the XBL only catches around 10% of the
SASL probes. May your luck hold up.
https://www.abuseipdb.com/user/139902 enless tryes :)
all zen
Hello,
We found the following in our email logs this morning. I ran
"collate" and here is the result:
May 29 02:10:04 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/bounce[31220]:
AFC7030537E6: postmaster non-delivery notification: 7A80D32EDB2C
May 29 02:10:04 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/cleanup[31245]:
7A
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 08:40:50AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 5/29/24 8:31 AM, Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users skrev den 2024-05-29 14:07:
> >
> > > Perhaps a bit of luck? For me, the XBL only catches around 10% of the
> > > SASL
On 2024-05-29 at 10:02:59 UTC-0400 (Thu, 30 May 2024 00:02:59 +1000)
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
[...]
I'd be curious to hear whether you'll find much AUTH brute-force
activity from SBL + CSS (and not XBL) and as mentioned previously,
blocking based on PBL is not v
After adding both lines and running postmap on /etc/postfix/virtual,
both the base address and the alias reach the destination machine (server2).
Thank you sir!
On 28/05/2024 19:27, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
Adam Weremczuk via Postfix-users:
I've
Greg Sims via Postfix-users:
> Hello,
>
> We found the following in our email logs this morning. I ran
> "collate" and here is the result:
>
> May 29 02:10:04 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/bounce[31220]:
> AFC7030537E6: postmaster non-delivery notification: 7A80D32EDB2C
> May 29 02:10:04 mai
On 29/05/2024 14:07, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 07:26:10AM -0400, John Hill via Postfix-users wrote:
The wrapper-mode TLS "smtps" rejects are naturally after the TLS
handshake.
465 inet n - n - - smtpd
-
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:24:58AM -0400, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote:
> How about using sender_canoical_maps?
>
> sender_canonical_maps = inline:{
> { double-bou...@mail01.raystedman.ora = double_bou...@raystedman.org } }
>
> Why are you sending these notifications to Google?
>
>
> > main.cf contains:
> >
> > # 24-05-28
> > # email comes from raystedman.org instead of mail0.raystedman.org
> > # note: the mail01 subdomain does not need a SPF record in DNS as a
> result
> > myorigin = raystedman.org
> >
> > I hoped this would allow the message being sent to be
> >
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Greg Sims via Postfix-users:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We found the following in our email logs this morning. I ran
> > "collate" and here is the result:
> >
> > May 29 02:10:04 mail01.raystedman.org postfix/bounce[31220]:
> > AFC7030537E6: postmaster non-delivery n
Greg Sims via Postfix-users:
> I wrote software that reviews the bounces in the Gmail mailbox and
> unsubscribes email addresses from the daily devotion distribution as
> needed.The software is very conservative in the way this is done.
> Bounces 3 out of 5 consecutive days and only for certain
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:52 PM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Presumably you have to DKIM or SPF or DMARC for hostname.raystedman.org,
> so any way to get double-bou...@raystedman.org should help.
>
> You have to be careful about mailer loops, though.
>
> Postfix gives special treatmen
Greg Sims via Postfix-users:
> On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 2:52?PM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> > Presumably you have to DKIM or SPF or DMARC for hostname.raystedman.org,
> > so any way to get double-bou...@raystedman.org should help.
> >
> > You have to be careful about mailer loops,
Hello the list,
I saw some open source providers who have these dmarc settings:
_dmarc.disroot.org. 3495 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;
rua=mailto:ab...@disroot.org; ruf=mailto:ab...@disroot.org;";
_dmarc.autistici.org. 3504 IN TXT "v=DMARC1; p=reject; adkim=s; aspf=s;
rua=mail
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 5:49 PM Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
wrote:
> I think it's a bad idea to send your double bounces to a different site.
> The Postfix design really wants to handle them locally.
Thank you Wietse.
I moved to a conservative configuration for tonight including deleting
th
19 matches
Mail list logo
