On 17.05.23 22:11, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
I'm using postfix (postmulti) with amavisd and trying to have separate
content filters based on the domain so I can make decisions on the destiny
of the email from within amavisd. Currently all mail is processed by the
same amavisd policy_bank.
s
Hello,
If a sender write a message which has N recipients in the same destination
domain (say gmx.de), when postfix deliver this message to peer MTA, will
it deliver one copy, or N copies?
Thanks.
--
sent from https://dkinbox.com/
___
Postfix-user
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 4:39 AM Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On 17.05.23 22:11, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> >I'm using postfix (postmulti) with amavisd and trying to have separate
> >content filters based on the domain so I can make decisions o
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:48:32PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
> If a sender write a message which has N recipients in the same
> destination domain (say gmx.de), when postfix deliver this message to
> peer MTA, will it deliver one copy, or N copies?
For a typical message the number
Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users writes:
> Now i added DNSSEC. Currently it is being registra job. 10 minutes ago,
> i did make some DS record at Cloudfalre.
>
> Thanks to Joachim, Patrick and raf ^^^
And now i added TLSA record for only *outbond* smtp server,
<>. I read Patrick's blog[1]. Stil
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:22:34PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
wrote:
> Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users writes:
>
> > Now i added DNSSEC. Currently it is being registra job. 10 minutes ago,
> > i did make some DS record at Cloudfalre.
> >
> > Thanks to Joachim, Patrick and raf ^^^
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:22:34PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
wrote:
> And now i added TLSA record for only *outbond* smtp server,
> .
It is also your secondary MX host:
https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/explore/?doraji.xyz
the primary MX host does not yet have TLSA records. Th
Hi,
Maybe my issue is that the always_bcc user is going through a transport at
all, and instead should just be delivered locally, or perhaps processed
only by the local_transport? How can I do that?
I recall many years ago doing that, before I set up multi-instance postfix.
Thanks,
Alex
On Thu,
For Letsencrypt certificates I´d definitely go with 2 1 1
8D02536C887482BC34FF54E41D2BA659BF85B341A0A20AFADB5813DCFBCF286D and optionally
the R4 derivate and add their successors when these are about to expire, rather
than 3 1 1 and change every two months.
Best Regards,
Joachim
-Ursprüngl
Hello Byung-Hee ,
for testing you may want to try https://blog.lindenberg.one/EmailSecurityTest.
Best Regards,
Joachim
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023 10:16
An: Postfix-users
Betreff: [pfx] Re: DANE and DNSSEC
Now i add
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 08:54:16PM +0200, Joachim Lindenberg via Postfix-users
wrote:
> For Letsencrypt certificates I´d definitely go with 2 1 1
> 8D02536C887482BC34FF54E41D2BA659BF85B341A0A20AFADB5813DCFBCF286D and
> optionally the R4 derivate and add their successors when these are
> about to
Hi,
> Is there a way to control smtpd_recipient_restrictions on a per-domain
> > basis so I can relax some of these restrictions for cases like this,
> > instead of a more reactive approach where I'm always adding
> > sender_checks.pcre entries?
>
> Instead of
>
> /etc/postfix/main.cf:
> smtpd
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:20:38AM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> Maybe my issue is that the always_bcc user is going through a transport at
> all, and instead should just be delivered locally, or perhaps processed
> only by the local_transport? How can I do that?
>
> I recall many years
Viktor,
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 7:16 PM Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users <
postfix-users@postfix.org> wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:20:38AM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> > Maybe my issue is that the always_bcc user is going through a transport
> at
> > all, and instead should ju
Alex via Postfix-users:
> May 18 18:24:00 cable postfix-120/smtpd[2919509]: NOQUEUE: reject: RCPT
> from send106.emailfilter.io[185.54.163.144]: 450 4.1.8 :
> Sender address rejected: Domain not found; from= to=<
> vojisla...@example.com> proto=ESMTP helo=
This is the result of REJECT_UNKNOWN_SEND
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:48:32PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> If a sender write a message which has N recipients in the same
>> destination domain (say gmx.de), when postfix deliver this message to
>> peer MTA, will it deliver one copy, or N copies?
>
> For a typical messa
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:07:55PM -0400, Alex via Postfix-users wrote:
> > Is there a way to control smtpd_recipient_restrictions on a per-domain
> > > basis [...]
To resolve the ambiguity, you might have said: "per *recipient* domain"
> If I interpret your instructions properly, this is kind o
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 08:57:34AM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>
> > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 07:48:32PM +0800, Tom Reed via Postfix-users
> > wrote:
> >
> >> If a sender write a message which has N recipients in the same
> >> destination domain (say gmx.de), when postfix deliver th
Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users writes:
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 09:22:34PM +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>> And now i added TLSA record for only *outbond* smtp server,
>> .
>
> It is also your secondary MX host:
>
> https://stats.dnssec-tools.org/explore/?doraji.xyz
19 matches
Mail list logo
