map in virtual_alias_maps file:
u...@foo.com u...@gmail.com
(then postmap this file). The message sent to u...@foo.com won't
reach into mailbox, but just forwarded to gmail.
How can I setup it to both reach local mailbox and forwarding?
This is a bad idea. Don't do this. Forwarding s
Thanks for your replies.
Meanwhile i have tested with some simple replacements in header checks.
/email@office/ REPLACE From: Office
/email@hospital/ REPLACE From: Hospital
With the above, the replacement works fine for multiple lines.
Here are the logs:
Apr 28 10:40:10 server postfix/smtpd[48572
On 28/04/23 21:19, Andreas Cieslak via Postfix-users wrote:
Why are To and From replaced in the header but not the subject?
Am I perhaps missing the right expression here and could someone give me
some advice?
Or is there really no way around Mailmunge or MimeDefang etc.?
Any hints would be app
> I have a local real mailbox: u...@foo.com
> When I setup this alias map in virtual_alias_maps file:
>
> u...@foo.com u...@gmail.com
>
> (then postmap this file).
> The message sent to u...@foo.com won't reach into mailbox, but just forwarded
> to gmail.
>
> How can I setup it to both reach lo
Ken Peng via Postfix-users writes:
> Do you know any plugins for scoring a domain?
> For example, new registered domain, free domain get the low scores.
How about dnswl.org?
Sincerely,
--
^고맙습니다 _布德天下_ 감사합니다_^))//
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- p
Hi !
question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not sent
from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
sen...@sub.domain.tld or sub.sub.domain.tld is rejected ?
at least i tried with header checks in pcre
/^From:\.*@.*\.*\.*/ DISCARD NO SUBDOMAINS
but this se
On 4/28/2023 8:59 AM, Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users wrote:
Hi !
question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not
sent from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
sen...@sub.domain.tld or sub.sub.domain.tld is rejected ?
That seems like a bad idea, extremely likel
Gerd Hoerst:
> question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not sent from a
> domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like sen...@sub.domain.tld or
> sub.sub.domain.tld is rejected ?
>
> at least i tried with header checks in pcre
>
> /^From:\.*@.*\.*\.*/ DISCARD NO SUBD
> question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not sent from a
> domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like sen...@sub.domain.tld or
> sub.sub.domain.tld is rejected ?
Generally, no, because you will reject legitimate domains
that just look like subdomains, e.g. *.co.uk, *
> Do you know any plugins for scoring a domain?
> For example, new registered domain, free domain get the low scores.
Postfix is not an antispam solution. Its job is to
reliably deliver emails. Therefore it has some functions
to avoid overload like query blocklists but to analyze
emails use con
On 2023-04-28 at 09:59:53 UTC-0400 (Fri, 28 Apr 2023 15:59:53 +0200)
Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users
is rumored to have said:
Hi !
question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not sent
from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
sen...@sub.domain.tld or sub.sub.dom
Dnia 28.04.2023 o godz. 15:59:53 Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not
> sent from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
> sen...@sub.domain.tld or sub.sub.domain.tld is rejected ?
As others have said, it's a total
April 29, 2023 at 12:38 AM, "Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users"
wrote:
>
> Dnia 28.04.2023 o godz. 15:59:53 Gerd Hoerst via Postfix-users pisze:
>
> >
> > question 1st : is it a good idea to reject any email which is not
> > sent from a domain (means sen...@domain.tld) any other like
> > se
On Fri, Apr 28, 2023 at 06:38:04PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote:
> Also take into account that many countries use two-level domain registration
> scheme ...
In Japan, 3rd-level public suffixes are quite common, taking the form:
...jp.
For example:
hospital.hekinan.aichi.jp.
April 28, 2023 at 1:02 AM, "Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users"
wrote:
>
> On 4/27/23 04:47, Ralph Seichter via Postfix-users wrote:
>
> >
> > * Ken Peng via Postfix-users:
> > Using rspamd instead of postscreen?
> > I'm not quite sure what you mean by that.
> > If you suggest relying on r
Saturday, April 29, 2023, 10:15:41 AM, Ken Peng via Postfix-users wrote:
> Sorry i have a question to postscreen.
> I saw many people use postscreen for RBL checks.
> But postfix itself have the RBL checks already:
> smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
>...
>reject_rbl_client zen.spamhaus.org
I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first line
it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line. However, that causes
postfix to terminate the headers and puts the Reply To line after the blank
line at the end of theheaders. As a result, none of the following
> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
> I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first
> line it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line. However, that
> causes postfix to terminate the headers and puts the Reply To line
> On Apr 28, 2023, at 23:13, Noel Jones via Postfix-users
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Apr 29, 2023, at 12:43 AM, Doug Hardie via Postfix-users
>> wrote:
>>
>> I have an app that sends SMTP to post fix to deliver an email. The first
>> line it sends after the DATA command is a Reply To line. Ho
19 matches
Mail list logo
