Hello,
I have a question about the automatic adding of missing headers.
Did an experiment with always_add_missing_headers = no.
I sent a mail via telnet manually to postfix and checked, what it's
forwarding to the next mail server.
According to the tcpdump output, a missing Date header seems to
On 20.04.23 09:25, Silamael Darkomen via Postfix-users wrote:
I have a question about the automatic adding of missing headers.
Did an experiment with always_add_missing_headers = no.
I sent a mail via telnet manually to postfix and checked, what it's
forwarding to the next mail server.
According
On 20 Apr 2023 10:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users wrote:
On 20.04.23 09:25, Silamael Darkomen via Postfix-users wrote:
I have a question about the automatic adding of missing headers.
Did an experiment with always_add_missing_headers = no.
I sent a mail via telnet manually to postfi
Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to appear in the
headers ?
The gubba-mint folks are getting extremely medieval about email security.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an em
White, Daniel E. (GSFC-770.0)[AEGIS] via Postfix-users:
> Is there any chance that SPF and DKIM records could be added to
> appear in the headers ?
The list server adds its own DKIM-Signature: on behalf of the domain
postfix.org, AND it adds ARC headers and Authentication-Results:
for the message
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
|>
|> Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: \
|> process id 8486: command time limit exceeded
|> Ap
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Wietse Venema wrote in
> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
> |Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> |> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
> |>
> |> Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: \
> |> process id 8486: comm
W dniu 19.04.2023 o 17:23, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
natan via Postfix-users:
Hi
I have question about *_error_limit and postfix
I have separated services like
smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail
I have roudcube which is used by several thousand users
On smtp outgoing in
Wietse Venema wrote in
<4q2khr57flzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
|>|> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
|>|>
|>|> Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[848
Hi
I use keepalived and easy check like:
vrrp_script chk_myscript {
script "/usr/bin/postfix-check.sh"
interval 4
fall 2
weight 10
user root
}
...
#!/bin/bash
echo "ehlo localhost" | /bin/nc -w 1 "127.0.0.1" 25 |grep -q "250"
...
It's not very pretty but d
natan wrote in
:
|Hi
|I use keepalived and easy check like:
|
|vrrp_script chk_myscript {
| script "/usr/bin/postfix-check.sh"
| interval 4
| fall 2
| weight 10
| user root
|}
|
|...
|#!/bin/bash
|echo "ehlo localhost" | /bin/nc -w 1 "127.0.0.1"
Steffen Nurpmeso:
> Wietse Venema wrote in
> <4q2khr57flzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
> |Steffen Nurpmeso:
> |> Wietse Venema wrote in
> |> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
> |>|Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> |>|> On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce
> |>|>
> |>|>
natan via Postfix-users:
> W dniu 19.04.2023 o?17:23, Wietse Venema via Postfix-users pisze:
> > natan via Postfix-users:
> >> Hi
> >> I have question about *_error_limit and postfix
> >>
> >> I have separated services like
> >> smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail
> >>
> >> I have roudcube
On 4/18/23 23:38, Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 19, 2023 at 11:33:36AM +0800, tom--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>
>> I got a lot of spams (20+ every day) like the following for which i even
>> don't know what language they were.
>>
>
>> مميز المنتدى العربي الثالث
>
> The
fyi
if SpamAssassin's in use in your Postfix message flow, then its TextCat plugin,
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/4.0.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_TextCat.html
does a decent job of detecting many langs. good enough for scoring but NOT for
outright policy reject, here.
__
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users wrote in
<4q2l0p03svzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|> <4q2khr57flzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|Steffen Nurpmeso:
|>|> Wietse Venema wrote in
|>|> <4q21sp16m7zj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
|>|>|Steffen Nurpmeso via Pos
I was doing some work with postfix logrotation as part of a recent project and
ran across what seems to be unintended behavior.
When running postfix logrotate the maillog_file is created with 600 permissions
which was tripping up a log tail system of ours. I'm working on the log tailer,
but loo
greetings,
do policyd-service (such as rate-limit) and milter (such as opendkim)
use the same communication way to postfix?
any difference between them?
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
18 matches
Mail list logo
