[pfx] Re: Open relay clarification

2023-04-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
On 17.04.23 13:38, Tyler Montney via Postfix-users wrote: Before getting started, this has been publicly disclosed by someone else a while ago. However, I still don't think it's necessary to name the organization to explain myself. My goal here is not only to give a proper argument to the provide

[pfx] *_error_limit and exclude

2023-04-19 Thread natan via Postfix-users
Hi I have question about *_error_limit and postfix I have separated services like smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail I have roudcube which is used by several thousand users On smtp outgoing in main.cf: ... smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 900 smtpd_hard_error_limit = 5 smtpd_soft

[pfx] Re: Postfix as relay server let us send messages with anothyer domain than ours

2023-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Demi Marie Obenour via Postfix-users: > > While Postfix can to some extent enforce envelope to sender mismatches, > > the real concern is usually the "From:" header, ... whose content is not > > the MSAs job to enforce. > > A milter must be used for this. Since this, along with DMARC, is a > core

[pfx] Outlook's "Recall:" messages

2023-04-19 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
Hello, or customer tried to recall send message (outlook/exchange feature) and the recipient started bombing server and original sender with mails "message recall failed" (outlook/microsoft failure). I was able to drop the messages using header_checks but I'm curious if anyone knows better wa

[pfx] Re: *_error_limit and exclude

2023-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
natan via Postfix-users: > Hi > I have question about *_error_limit and postfix > > I have separated services like > smtp incomming and smtp outgoing and webmail > > I have roudcube which is used by several thousand users > > On smtp outgoing in main.cf: > ... > smtpd_client_connection_count_lim

[pfx] Postfix legacy releases 3.7.5, 3.6.9, 3.5.19, 3.4.29

2023-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at https://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.7.5.html] This will be the last update for Postfix version 3.4. Fixed with Postfix 3.7.5, 3.6.9, 3.5.19: * Bugfix (problem introduced in Postfix 3.5): check_ccert_access did not ha

[pfx] Fwd: [ANN]ounce of S-postgray v0.8.1 ("Something Gray on Bicycle-Day")

2023-04-19 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hello. Unlike promised there had to be another release, and i still hope it is ok to forward the announcement here. (Bicycle-Day has passed in the meantime, however.) This fixes some bugs, even non-developers can now see --verbose logging, for example. Out of interest i implemented sandboxing, s

[pfx] 3.8.0: spawn says "command time limit exceeded"

2023-04-19 Thread Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users
Hello. On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: process id 8486: command time limit exceeded Apr 19 14:43:56 postfix/spawn[19651]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: process id 19755: command time limit exceeded

[pfx] possible bug in rspamd

2023-04-19 Thread Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; list.sys4.de; dkim=fail; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none Authentication-Results: list.sys4.de; dkim=fail; arc=none (Message is not ARC signed); dmarc=none when originating mails is not dkim signed then i belive dkim=fail here should be repor

[pfx] Re: 3.8.0: spawn says "command time limit exceeded"

2023-04-19 Thread Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users: > Hello. > > On 3.8.0 services managed via spawn(8) now produce > > Apr 19 01:03:04 postfix/spawn[8485]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgray: > process id 8486: command time limit exceeded > Apr 19 14:43:56 postfix/spawn[19651]: warning: /usr/libexec/s-postgr