[pfx] Wildcard delivery from Postfix to Dovecot LDA issues

2023-04-01 Thread EML via Postfix-users
[apologies for postfix/dovecot cross-post] How, exactly, do postfix and dovecot communicate when postfix attempts to determine whether to deliver a message to the dovecot LDA, or to bounce it? In other words, how does postfix decide to bounce foo, and deliver bar, in these log messages: post

[pfx] Re: Wildcard delivery from Postfix to Dovecot LDA issues

2023-04-01 Thread Viktor Dukhovni via Postfix-users
On Sat, Apr 01, 2023 at 07:02:51PM +0100, EML via Postfix-users wrote: > How, exactly, do postfix and dovecot communicate when postfix attempts > to determine whether to deliver a message to the dovecot LDA, or to > bounce it? In other words, how does postfix decide to bounce foo, and > deliver

[pfx] Re: Wildcard delivery from Postfix to Dovecot LDA issues

2023-04-01 Thread EML via Postfix-users
Ahhh... thanks Viktor and ptld. Adding an entry for @sub.example.com to virtual_alias_maps fixed everything. ___ Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org

[pfx] Re: secondary MX server

2023-04-01 Thread Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users
Dnia 1.04.2023 o godz. 13:04:30 Peter via Postfix-users pisze: > > Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern > internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet. [...] > None of this is what you are considering. If you still want to > implement a secondary M

[pfx] Re: secondary MX server

2023-04-01 Thread Peter via Postfix-users
On 2/04/23 09:03, Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-users wrote: Dnia 1.04.2023 o godz. 13:04:30 Peter via Postfix-users pisze: Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet. [...] None of this is what you are consid

[pfx] Re: secondary MX server

2023-04-01 Thread fh--- via Postfix-users
If I remember correctly, someone mentioned NoListing recently on that list. For this, you *need* a secondary MX, and it is actually your main mail server - the primary MX never accepts mail... Hallo, 1. what's the advantage of this architecture? 2. how to make primary MX not accepting mes

[pfx] virtual_alias_domains user in dovecot-users

2023-04-01 Thread fh--- via Postfix-users
Hello, if a domain is in virtual_alias_domains only, not in the virtual_mailbox_domains. But there is a user on this domain putting in dovecot-users. Can this user get authorized by dovecot SASL and have a mailbox access? (just like the regular domain user.) Thanks. _

[pfx] Re: virtual_alias_domains user in dovecot-users

2023-04-01 Thread brian whalen via Postfix-users
If I understand your question right I have done this. In the past I installed the now extinct mail-stack-delivery package in Ubuntu and used that to support both users for my main domain and some virtual ones. I added a user that would be a shortened version of the domain I was hosting, used /e