> De: Benny Pedersen via Postfix-users
> Enviada: 30 de março de 2023 21:20
> Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Assunto: [pfx] Re: Success DSN for virtual mailboxes not working
>
> Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-30 20:29:
>
> > We have tried to figure out why this happens, but
> De: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> Enviada: 30 de março de 2023 21:25
> Para: Postfix users
> Assunto: [pfx] Re: Success DSN for virtual mailboxes not working
>
> Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> > Hello.
> >
> > We have a setup where postifix is configured to send all mails sent to
> > do
Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-30 20:29:
> We have tried to figure out why this happens, but haven't found a
> solution until now.
logs ?
On 31.03.23 12:10, Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users wrote:
I don't find anything relevant in logs: just an indication that a DSN was sent
Hello,
Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary MX
for my domain email?
I am afraid the secondary MX was abused by spammers.
Thanks.
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email
* Corey Hickman via Postfix-users :
> Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary MX for
> my domain email?
I don't know if the RFC mandate it, but nowadays everbody knows
better, so WTF.
> I am afraid the secondary MX was abused by spammers.
Indeed. The secondary basic
Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> > De: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> > Enviada: 30 de mar?o de 2023 21:25
> > Para: Postfix users
> > Assunto: [pfx] Re: Success DSN for virtual mailboxes not working
> >
> > Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > We have a setup where posti
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> Enviada: 31 de março de 2023 12:54
> Para: Postfix users
> Assunto: [pfx] Re: Success DSN for virtual mailboxes not working
>
> Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> > > De: Wietse Venema via Postfix-users
> > > Enviada: 30 de ma
On Fri, Mar 31, 2023 at 02:00:49PM +0100, Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users wrote:
> Logs of message with success DSN sent:
Are you sure you syslog system is not dropping some of the log messages?
(A common problem with systemd-based logging).
> Mar 31 13:26:19 MAIL01 postfix/lmtp[1444780]: C91CB22
Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> Logs of message with success DSN sent:
>
> Mar 31 13:26:16 MAIL01 postfix/cleanup[110]: 21069213F:
> message-id= uYAAA4AABB+0ZLW85dyTYzsfdF+fjJNAQA=@otherdomain.com>
> Mar 31 13:26:19 MAIL01 MailScanner[1402982]: Requeue: 21069213F.A0295 to
> C91CB
There is a difference in MailScanner logging when a SUCCESS DSN is
created and when it is not created.
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users:
> > Logs of message with success DSN sent:
> >
> > Mar 31 13:26:16 MAIL01 postfix/cleanup[110]: 21069213F:
> > message-id=
Hey, I have a strange problem, my incoming queue is growing and my active and
deferred queues are low on queue items. I checked and I have a lot of incoming
mailer-daemon and double-bounce emails, is there a way to discard these
messages?
I've already tried to create a transport_map by sending a
* Israel britto via Postfix-users :
> Hey, I have a strange problem, my incoming queue is growing and my
> active and deferred queues are low on queue items. I checked and I
> have a lot of incoming mailer-daemon and double-bounce emails, is
> there a way to discard these messages?
Read them usin
Israel britto via Postfix-users:
[ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ]
> Hey, I have a strange problem, my incoming queue is growing and my active and
> deferred queues are low on queue items. I checked and I have a lot of
> incoming mailer-daemon and double-bounce emails, is there a way to discard
* Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
> Start by looking for "@domain" wildcards in virtual_alias_maps or
Somewhat related: I was under the impression that virtual_alias_maps
"@domainA @domainB" did NOT break recipient verifiction. Or am I
hallucinating?
--
Ralf Hildebrandt
Geschäftsbereich IT
> -Mensagem original-
> De: Matus UHLAR - fantomas via Postfix-users
> Enviada: 31 de março de 2023 12:29
> Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
> Assunto: [pfx] Re: Success DSN for virtual mailboxes not working
>
> >> Nuno Pereira via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-30 20:29:
> >> > We have t
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users:
> * Wietse Venema via Postfix-users :
>
> > Start by looking for "@domain" wildcards in virtual_alias_maps or
>
> Somewhat related: I was under the impression that virtual_alias_maps
> "@domainA @domainB" did NOT break recipient verifiction. Or am I
> hallucina
On 1/04/23 00:36, Corey Hickman via Postfix-users wrote:
Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary MX
for my domain email?
Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
internet and tend to be a relic of the 1990s dialup internet. What is
oft
On 01/04/2023 08:04, Peter via Postfix-users wrote:
On 1/04/23 00:36, Corey Hickman via Postfix-users wrote:
Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary
MX for my domain email?
Secondary, or backup MXes are almost never recommended in the modern
internet and tend to be
Corey Hickman via Postfix-users writes:
> Hello,
>
> Since almost every sending MTA has the queues, do I need a secondary
> MX for my domain email?
>
> I am afraid the secondary MX was abused by spammers.
>
> Thanks.
I am now running secondary mx. It is valuable for me.
Use MTA-STS (testing is
19 matches
Mail list logo
