I have checked the commands you listed in your first email, but I do not
find any errors in the database, table, or MySQL service. Perhaps, as
you say, this is not the correct path for the configuration.
I just want to send mail directly from the Postfix server without a
relayhost.
What i have
> Is it possible to use an object storage system (like aws's S3) to store
> message files? if this can be implemented we may have a more persistent
> storage for email. AFAIK aws's S3 has three replicas for each file in their
> system by default.
At that scale emails are usually delivered via
> I have checked the commands you listed in your first email, but I do not find
> any errors in the database, table, or MySQL service. Perhaps, as you say,
> this is not the correct path for the configuration.
Currently you are connecting via unix domain sockets.
Mysql usually listens to 127.0
I've written a before-queue milter that I'm trying to integrate with
Postfix, but there doesn't seem to be any specific documentation on how
to do this. During development, I ran the milter manually, listening on
port 7950, with nothing in master.cf, and this in main.cf:
smtpd_milters = inet:l
EML:
> I can run the milter as a service, if necessary, instead of adding an entry
> in master.cf, but this feels like the wrong way to do this. Thanks.
But note that this is how milters are normally operated, eg milters
installed from a distro package.
___
unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
Please do you have any documentation on this?
Messaggio originale
Oggetto: [pfx] Re: MySQL error from not all the receiver
Data: 2023-03-12 13:26
Mittente: Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
Destinatario: Po
On 12/03/2023 12:49, David Bürgin via Postfix-users wrote:
EML:
I can run the milter as a service, if necessary, instead of adding an entry in
master.cf, but this feels like the wrong way to do this. Thanks.
But note that this is how milters are normally operated, eg milters
installed from
That's a surprise - thanks. I've just checked and seen that opendkim and
opendmarc set up init-style services. I'll do a systemd service for this
milter, but I'd be interested to hear if there's any policy or other advice
about whether we should be using master.cf or a service.
ultimately up
Dnia 12.03.2023 o godz. 12:43:00 EML via Postfix-users pisze:
> I can run the milter as a
> service, if necessary, instead of adding an entry in master.cf, but
> this feels like the wrong way to do this. Thanks.
It's actually the proper way to do this. Milters are separate services that
Postfix co
EML via Postfix-users:
> I've written a before-queue milter that I'm trying to integrate with
> Postfix, but there doesn't seem to be any specific documentation on how
> to do this. During development, I ran the milter manually, listening on
> port 7950, with nothing in master.cf, and this in ma
Wietse Venema via Postfix-users:
> EML via Postfix-users:
> > I've written a before-queue milter that I'm trying to integrate with
> > Postfix, but there doesn't seem to be any specific documentation on how
> > to do this. During development, I ran the milter manually, listening on
> > port 7950
PGNet Dev via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-12 14:46:
systemctl list-units | egrep "regex|clam|spam|dkim" |grep service
clamav-daemon.serviceloaded active running clamd scanner
clamav-milter.serviceloaded active running clamav milter
dkimpy-milter.s
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users :
> approach to subscriber self management. Once you've become a registered
> MLM platform participant you can easily change settings that will apply to all
> lists you've subscribed to in one place. I consider that a great usability
> benefit for subscriber
Ralf Hildebrandt via Postfix-users skrev den 2023-03-12 16:10:
* Patrick Ben Koetter via Postfix-users :
approach to subscriber self management. Once you've become a
registered
MLM platform participant you can easily change settings that will
apply to all
lists you've subscribed to in one plac
On 3/12/23 01:21, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> On 2023-03-12 at 00:03:32 UTC-0500 (Sun, 12 Mar 2023 00:03:32 -0500)
> Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
> is rumored to have said:
>
>> On 3/11/23 19:04, pyh--- via Postfix-users wrote:
>>> Hello list,
>>>
>>> Is it possible to use an object
Demi Marie Obenour via Postfix-users:
> On 3/12/23 01:21, Bill Cole via Postfix-users wrote:
> > On 2023-03-12 at 00:03:32 UTC-0500 (Sun, 12 Mar 2023 00:03:32 -0500)
> > Phil Stracchino via Postfix-users
> > is rumored to have said:
> >
> >> On 3/11/23 19:04, pyh--- via Postfix-users wrote:
> >>>
i try to remove "smtp_sasl_password_maps" to main.cf but external mail
not send !
In the log file, i can see "fatal error smtp_sasl_password_maps".
I honestly don't know how to fix it...
Il 2023-03-12 13:26 Gerald Galster via Postfix-users ha scritto:
I have checked the commands you listed in
On 13/03/2023 02.10, Antonino Di Mauro via Postfix-users wrote:
unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
Please do you have any documentation on this?
https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/8.0/en/
I'm no expert on Postfix, but can talk about databases. To help with
Which setting will extend the amount of time allowed for Thunderbird to
connect to send and/or receive messages from Postfix?
NB postfix uses Submission -> smtpd
(I've found references to Relay cf Submission but don't appreciate
difference)
or should it be an lmtp setting vis-a-vis Dovecot?
Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
<20230312003030.4aldj%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
|Steffen Nurpmeso wrote in
| <20230311003215.yvtaf%stef...@sdaoden.eu>:
||I see a thread for "double-bounce check applied to itself" from
||February 2021,[.]
| ...
||Is there an easy (non-DNS etc) way to say that @sdaoden.e
Postfix users wrote in
<4pzsd16nkpzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
...
|Postfix must wait for fsync() to complete (or whatever its Cloud
|equivalent is), before it can take responsibility for delivery of
(postfix does not support FULLFSYNC on MacOS.)
--steffen
|
|Der Kragenbaer,The
On Mon, Mar 13, 2023 at 11:16:26AM +1300, DL Neil via Postfix-users wrote:
> Which setting will extend the amount of time allowed for Thunderbird to
> connect to send and/or receive messages from Postfix?
Postfix is not involved in MUA access to read mail, that's your IMAP
server, Dovecot or Cyr
> unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
> Please do you have any documentation on this?
Sorry, I can't recommend an up to date howto. Perhaps other list members can
help.
A lot of links at https://www.postfix.org/docs.html are outdated or do not
exist anymor
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 7:02:41 PM EDT Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
wrote:
> > unfortunately I don't know this topic, but I'm really willing to study.
> > Please do you have any documentation on this?
> Sorry, I can't recommend an up to date howto. Perhaps other list members can
> help.
>
>
Steffen Nurpmeso via Postfix-users:
> Postfix users wrote in
> <4pzsd16nkpzj...@spike.porcupine.org>:
> ...
> |Postfix must wait for fsync() to complete (or whatever its Cloud
> |equivalent is), before it can take responsibility for delivery of
>
> (postfix does not support FULLFSYNC on MacOS.
On 13/03/2023 12.05, Scott Kitterman via Postfix-users wrote:
On Sunday, March 12, 2023 7:02:41 PM EDT Gerald Galster via Postfix-users
wrote:
...
My recommendation to the OP would be to reconsider what they are trying to
accomplish and what's the simplest way to do so. Through this thread I
Thanks - will re-focus investigation.
(evidently web-searching led in wrong direction)
--
Regards =dn
___
Postfix-users mailing list -- postfix-users@postfix.org
To unsubscribe send an email to postfix-users-le...@postfix.org
27 matches
Mail list logo
