On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 03:16:53PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> Perhaps:
>
> /^(Received:.*)192\.168\.1\.2(.*)$/ REPLACE ${1}127.0.0.2${2}
No. This is neither precise nor accurate.
* Precision, the proposed regular expression can match unexpected
parts of the "Received" header.
* Accur
Dnia 14.01.2023 o godz. 16:11:12 Simon Wilson pisze:
> When the router fails over, postfix's default route to the internet
> still goes through the same gateway IP and the internet is
> accessible - but now postfix sees the world through the router
> getting to the internet via a non-static IP, not
I use postfix on my home server and deliver mail by connecting to my
hosting providers' "smart host" using authenticated SMTP.
My home system's hostname is zbmc.eu but I don't use that domain in my
E-Mail address, I use isbd.co.uk which domain is hosted at one of my
hosting providers (mythic-beast
On 14.01.23 11:02, Chris Green wrote:
I use postfix on my home server and deliver mail by connecting to my
hosting providers' "smart host" using authenticated SMTP.
My home system's hostname is zbmc.eu but I don't use that domain in my
E-Mail address, I use isbd.co.uk which domain is hosted at o
> However most of the time I use my hosting at gandi.net to send my
> E-Mail, so mail from ch...@isbd.co.uk originates on zbmc.eu, is
> transferred by authenticated SMTP to mail.gandi.net and is sent on
> from there to whatever its destination is.
>
> As I understand it the SPF records for mail.ga
> On 13 Jan 2023, at 16:22, Gerben Wierda wrote:
>
> I have created a second postfix server in my LAN. The idea is to use both in
> a failover/loadbalancing setting for now. At the back are two dovecots that
> replicate to each other.
>
> When mail is sent out via my router, it picks up anythi
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 04:55:45PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 14.01.23 11:02, Chris Green wrote:
> >I use postfix on my home server and deliver mail by connecting to my
> >hosting providers' "smart host" using authenticated SMTP.
> >
> >My home system's hostname is zbmc.eu but I don'
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 05:03:15PM +0100, Gerald Galster wrote:
> > However most of the time I use my hosting at gandi.net to send my
> > E-Mail, so mail from ch...@isbd.co.uk originates on zbmc.eu, is
> > transferred by authenticated SMTP to mail.gandi.net and is sent on
> > from there to whatever
>> Given an email from ch...@isbd.co.uk, originating at zbmc.eu and sent
>> via mail.gandi.net (authenticated smtp submission) to b...@server.com:
>>
>> - server.com sees the ip address of mail.gandi.net (incoming connection)
>> - server.com querys DNS for ch...@isbd.co.uk (host -t txt isbd.co.uk)
>> What I'm not clear about is what happens when the mail is sent onwards
>> by the 'smarthost' at Gandi. Does it change the envelope sender to
>
> Send an email to yourself and have a look at the headers.
> Some MTAs add received headers like "received by for ".
I meant Return-Path or look a
I am looking at putting HAproxy between the internet and my two inside postfix
MTA's
I have a question. The documentation says: "The name of the proxy protocol used
by an optional before-postscreen proxy agent ". 'Optional' seems to suggest I
can safely set these to haproxy even if no haproxy i
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 01:47:10AM +0100, Gerben Wierda wrote:
> I am looking at putting HAproxy between the internet and my two inside
> postfix MTA's
Is there a good reason to do that? If not, don't.
> I have a question. The documentation says: "The name of the proxy
> protocol used by an opt
On 14/01/23 23:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Sat, Jan 14, 2023 at 03:16:53PM +1300, Peter wrote:
Perhaps:
/^(Received:.*)192\.168\.1\.2(.*)$/ REPLACE ${1}127.0.0.2${2}
No. This is neither precise nor accurate.
* Precision, the proposed regular expression can match unexpected
pa
On Sun, Jan 15, 2023 at 05:26:07PM +1300, Peter wrote:
> But only a part with his exact IP address in it, the IP address that the
> OP is trying to hide.
The typical user who wants to lightly censor Received lines is not
trying to hide a specific IP address, by far the more common need
is to pru
On 15/01/23 17:34, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
The typical user who wants to lightly censor Received lines is not
trying to hide a specific IP address, by far the more common need
is to prune IP addresses from received headers add by a submission
service. This will often also take care of hiding vari
15 matches
Mail list logo
