Re: Spammer succeeded in relaying through my server

On 12/23/22 21:29, raf wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 06:58:17PM +0400, Samer Afach > wrote: > >> Dear postfix experts: >> >> I think I'm getting to the end of this problem. I was able to use haproxy to >> relay connections to my docker container with correct source information >> (and I'm see

Fw: DKIM not signing in plesk server with postfix

Hi, thanks for the response... I have exhausted my attempts with plesk docs, and plesk support is out of the realm due to the age of the install, Plesk version: 12.5.30 Update #79 , last updated at Dec 22, 2020. I don't want to upgrade further as that means I would have to do far more work to s

Re: DKIM not signing in plesk server with postfix

Can you post the relevant bits of the postfix and opendkim configs (omit the actual key data, of course). Anything in the logfiles? -Dan > On Dec 25, 2022, at 15:18, Water Around wrote: > > > > Hi, thanks for the response... > I have exhausted my attempts with plesk docs, and plesk support

Re: Self hosting solution for Christmas

Thanks Santa!!! Good work! -- _Engº Julio Cesar Covolato 0v0 /(_)\ F: 55-11-99175-9260 ^ ^ PSI INTERNET -- Em 24/12/2022 05:03, Andre Rodier escreveu: Hello everyone, Here my present for Christmas: a new vers

Re: Self hosting solution for Christmas

Postfixadmin in next version? Thanks again! -- _Engº Julio Cesar Covolato 0v0 /(_)\ F: 55-11-99175-9260 ^ ^ PSI INTERNET -- Em 24/12/2022 05:03, Andre Rodier escreveu: Hello everyone, Here my present for Chr

Re: Self hosting solution for Christmas

On 26 December 2022 03:22:13 CET, julio covolato wrote: >Postfixadmin in next version? > >Thanks again! > >-- >_Engº Julio Cesar Covolato > 0v0 > /(_)\ F: 55-11-99175-9260 > ^ ^ PSI INTERNET >-- > >Em 24/12/2022 05:

Re: Spammer succeeded in relaying through my server

On Sat, Dec 24, 2022 at 07:51:42AM +0400, Samer Afach wrote: > Dear Raf: > > Thank you very much. I just tested my server with mxtoolbox, and all seems > good. I didn't realize mxtoolbox works without MX records, thanks for that > hint. > > I applied 90% of your suggestions, and some I didn't

Re: Spammer succeeded in relaying through my server

On 24/12/22 14:22, raf wrote: On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 09:51:48AM +0400, Samer Afach wrote: I see. Thank you for the explanation. So the right way to state this is that HELO/EHLO requires a valid FQDN/hostname only for MTAs, and for MUAs it's just ignored because authentication is what matters

Re: Spammer succeeded in relaying through my server

On 25/12/22 02:48, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote: The various smtpd_*_restrictions lists are applied at various stages of the SMTP transaction. smtpd_client_restrictions are applied right at the beginning of the connection, smtpd_helo_restrictions are applied after HELO/EHLO, and so on. This is not entir

Re: Spammer succeeded in relaying through my server

On 24/12/22 16:51, Samer Afach wrote: (and if you're wondering why port 25's encryption is `may` in main.cf, it's because I still don't know how to get fetchmail to deliver emails without that... another issue to be solved). Fetchmail should not be delivering to port 25 as port 25 should be f