Thanks, Bill. That looks rather variable, though. This morning I'm
getting 19 ms on the mail server and 163 ms on my desktop. Mail server
may have the uri in cache, I suppose. But it does look as if the rejects
I get are not my fault.
Thanks, Viktor. That's interesting. You'd think someone like MS could
get it right. :(
Sadly MS is as fallible as the rest of us.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 2, 2022, at 4:56 AM, Linkcheck wrote:
>
> Thanks, Viktor. That's interesting. You'd think someone like MS could get it
> right. :(
>
The daily pflogsumm report shows that (in recent days) 60~93% of
attempts to connect are rejected, and bounce-off Postfix's settings, eg
450 4.7.1 <00nyBxbT>: Helo command rejected: Host not found;
proto=SMTP helo=<00nyBxbT> (total: 1)
1 115.213.249.159 (<>)
The EHLO string
DL Neil:
> The daily pflogsumm report shows that (in recent days) 60~93% of
> attempts to connect are rejected, and bounce-off Postfix's settings, eg
>
> 450 4.7.1 <00nyBxbT>: Helo command rejected: Host not found;
> proto=SMTP helo=<00nyBxbT> (total: 1)
> 1 115.213.249.159 (
On 2022-11-02 at 13:39:44 UTC-0400 (Thu, 3 Nov 2022 06:39:44 +1300)
DL Neil
is rumored to have said:
The daily pflogsumm report shows that (in recent days) 60~93% of
attempts to connect are rejected, and bounce-off Postfix's settings,
eg
450 4.7.1 <00nyBxbT>: Helo command rejected: Host
On 03.11.22 06:39, DL Neil wrote:
The daily pflogsumm report shows that (in recent days) 60~93% of
attempts to connect are rejected, and bounce-off Postfix's settings,
eg
450 4.7.1 <00nyBxbT>: Helo command rejected: Host not found;
proto=SMTP helo=<00nyBxbT> (total: 1)
1 115.2
