I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
several other TLD domains,
a while back using help from this list, some write ups and mxtoolbox as
means of verifying/testing I've set SPF/DKIM/DMARC (or so I thought...)
as it seemed to pass all test I was able to run, I assumed
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 05:12:40PM +1000, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
> several other TLD domains,
> a while back using help from this list, some write ups and mxtoolbox as
> means of verifying/testing I've set SPF/DKIM/DMARC (or so
On 17.09.22 17:12, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
several other TLD domains,
a while back using help from this list, some write ups and mxtoolbox as
means of verifying/testing I've set SPF/DKIM/DMARC (or so I thought...)
as it seemed t
li...@sbt.net.au skrev den 2022-09-17 09:12:
I get NO SPF for geko.sbt.net.au, I do get SPF for sbt.net.au
you need spf rr pr enveloper sender domains, and that include
subdomains, only dmarc dont need subdomains dmarc, confused ?, yes but
it imho very simple, and lastly remember envelope se
raf skrev den 2022-09-17 11:30:
"v=spf1 ip4:103.106.168.106 ip4:103.106.168.105 ip4:125.168.124.3
include:_spf.google.com ~all"
include _spf.google.com is unneeded
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/?domain=sbt.net.au
sbt.net.au will pass without, if the ip that send email to google is
liste
li...@sbt.net.au skrev den 2022-09-17 09:12:
I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
several other TLD domains,
https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/?domain=geko.sbt.net.au
there is no spf there, dmarc will not pass on missing subdomains, spf
will be none
avoid unneed
Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2022-09-17 11:54:
% dig any geko.sbt.net.au @ns1.yourdnshost.net.
;; Connection to 203.209.194.250#53(203.209.194.250) for
geko.sbt.net.au failed: timed out.
;; Connection to 203.209.194.250#53(203.209.194.250) for
geko.sbt.net.au failed: timed out.
https://mul
On Sat, September 17, 2022 7:54 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> your domain is registered to ns1.netregistry.net. nameservers:
>
> Name Server: NS1.NETREGISTRY.NET
> Name Server: NS2.NETREGISTRY.NET
> Name Server: NS3.NETREGISTRY.NET
>
>
> however, NS records say otherwise:
>
> sbt.net.au.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:54:57AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> your domain is registered to ns1.netregistry.net. nameservers:
>
> Name Server: NS1.NETREGISTRY.NET
> Name Server: NS2.NETREGISTRY.NET
> Name Server: NS3.NETREGISTRY.NET
>
> however, NS records say otherwise:
>
> sbt.net.
It has been my experience that it is beneficial to include SPF and DMARC
records for the mail server's hostname along with the domain name.
Domain example.com with mail server mail.example.com:
@IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx -all"
mail IN TXT "v=spf1 include:example.com -all"
_dma
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 11:54:57AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
> On 17.09.22 17:12, li...@sbt.net.au wrote:
> > I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
> > several other TLD domains,
> > a while back using help from this list, some write ups and mxtoolbox as
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 01:46:10PM +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> li...@sbt.net.au skrev den 2022-09-17 09:12:
> > I have mail server on geko.sbt.net.au serving sbt.net.au as well as
> > several other TLD domains,
>
> https://dmarcian.com/spf-survey/?domain=geko.sbt.net.au
>
> there is no spf t
On Sat, Sep 17, 2022 at 10:39:46AM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> If this domain was in fact served by netregistry.net, that could well
> have been the problem. There is an ongoing over 24hour DNS outage at
> netregistry.net (where, e.g., they seem to be dropping all DNS queries
> from most Goog
13 matches
Mail list logo
