Hello,
Documentation for smtpd_sender_login_maps does not specify expected
values in a table (login->mapped or mapped->login or login->map1+map2 ?)
I've these configured at /etc/postfix/main.cf :
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/srv/vmail/recipient-aliases
smtpd_sender_login_maps = hash:/srv/vmail/
I've made some testing and it seems to be this interpretation of table,
and with unique left-column values:
FromAddress1AuthorizedLogin
FromAddress2AuthorizedLogin1 AuthorizedLogin2
FromAddress3AuthorizedLogin1 AuthorizedLogin2
FromAddress4AuthorizedLogin
FromAddress5Authoriz
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Narcis Garcia wrote:
I've made some testing and it seems to be this interpretation of table, and
with unique left-column values:
FromAddress1AuthorizedLogin
FromAddress2AuthorizedLogin1 AuthorizedLogin2
FromAddress3AuthorizedLogin1 AuthorizedLogin2
FromAddress4
Dear Wietse,
I managed to get my multi-domain setup running with postmulti. However, I
am stuck with a new issue. I have a single NIC that I wanted to use across
each postfix instance. So I created IP aliases and used them one for each
instance and set up the default instance as a nullclient.
Bu
__
I'm using this dedicated address because personal addresses aren't
masked enough at this mail public archive. Public archive administrator
should fix this against automated addresses collectors.
El 7/2/22 a les 11:37, Bernardo Reino ha escrit:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2022, Narcis Garcia wrote
Hello,
I'm using the following configuration in main.cf:
virtual_alias_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual
And I using the following rule in /etc/postfix/virtual file:
/^(.+)\.(.+)@noreply\.(.+)\.net$/ix $1.$2...@newdomain.com
but I get the following errors:
warning: regexp map /etc/postfix/vi
07.02.22, 11:56 + 0100 Benoit Gschwind:
I'm using the following configuration in main.cf:
virtual_alias_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual
And I using the following rule in /etc/postfix/virtual file:
/^(.+)\.(.+)@noreply\.(.+)\.net$/ix $1.$2...@newdomain.com
but I get the following errors:
Hello,
I'm was reading http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html about increase
number of process configurations related.
We can increase smtp easly to 1000 connections for example to allow
multiple incoming connections. But what about pickup and qmsg processes?
by default is configuret to 1
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
https://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.7.0.html]
Postfix stable release 3.7.0 is available. This ends the support
for legacy release Postfix 3.3.
The main changes are below. See the RELEASE_NOTES file for further
details.
*
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
https://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.6.4.html]
These releases catch up with portability fixes that are also part
of Postfix 3.7.0. This will be the last update for Postfix version
3.3.
* Glibc 2.34 implements closefrom().
V?ctor Rubiella Monfort:
> Hello,
>
> I'm was reading http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html about increase
> number of process configurations related.
>
> We can increase smtp easly to 1000 connections for example to allow
> multiple incoming connections. But what about pickup and qmsg proc
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 03:11:25PM +0100, Víctor Rubiella Monfort wrote:
> We can increase smtp easly to 1000 connections for example to allow
> multiple incoming connections.
When you raise the number of "smtp inet ... smtpd" process slots the you
just need to ensure that your disk and network a
Nitin N:
> Dear Wietse,
>
> I managed to get my multi-domain setup running with postmulti. However, I
> am stuck with a new issue. I have a single NIC that I wanted to use across
> each postfix instance. So I created IP aliases and used them one for each
> instance and set up the default instance
Thank you for the help,
maybe I did not read the documentation correctly :)
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 12:13 +0100, Markus Schönhaber wrote:
> 07.02.22, 11:56 + 0100 Benoit Gschwind:
>
> > I'm using the following configuration in main.cf:
> >
> > virtual_alias_maps = regexp:/etc/postfix/virtual
>
Building from https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/tree/postfix-3.7 leads
to this configuration info:
root@2837a210b4e2:/home/python-docker/code# postconf | grep mail_version
mail_version = 3.7.0-RC2
Is the configuration tag incorrect, or is indeed the branch behind the
release ?
Thanks in advan
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:37:24PM -0300, Nilo César Teixeira wrote:
> Building from https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/tree/postfix-3.7 leads
> to this configuration info:
You must have a stale copy of the branch.
https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/blob/postfix-3.7/postfix/src/global/m
On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:43:55AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > Is the configuration tag incorrect, or is indeed the branch behind the
> > release ?
>
> Update your git clone.
Note also that my Postfix git repository is not an official
location from which to obtain and build Postfix. It ma
On 2/7/22 10:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
> V?ctor Rubiella Monfort:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm was reading http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html about increase
>> number of process configurations related.
>>
>> We can increase smtp easly to 1000 connections for example to allow
>> multiple incoming con
> On 7 Feb 2022, at 11:54 am, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> To what extend is Postfix’s process-per-connection architecture a
> limitation here?
It isn't a practical barrier. The reason to increase concurrency
is to be able to handle more "slow" connections without running out
of connection slo
Demi Marie Obenour:
> On 2/7/22 10:00, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > V?ctor Rubiella Monfort:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> I'm was reading http://www.postfix.org/TUNING_README.html about increase
> >> number of process configurations related.
> >>
> >> We can increase smtp easly to 1000 connections for exampl
Hi Viktor,
Indeed, in my script I was cloning from my fork's version of your
repository.
Simple fix, thanks.
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:44 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 01:37:24PM -0300, Nilo César Teixeira wrote:
>
> > Building from https://github.com/vdukhovni/postfix/tre
Many thanks for helping with the silly question!
python-docker@376137470ed1:~/code$ postconf | grep mail_version
mail_version = 3.7.0
milter_macro_v = $mail_name $mail_version
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 1:50 PM Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2022 at 11:43:55AM -0500, Viktor Dukhovni wrote
We have a postfix/dovecot/mysql configuration. We recently removed one of the
users from the database, however when we send email, it still looks like the
address we are sending to is a local address and bounces with a “no such user”
error.
I have tried restarting both postfix and dovecot with
SH> We have a postfix/dovecot/mysql configuration. We recently
SH> removed one of the users from the database, however when we send
SH> email, it still looks like the address we are sending to is a
SH> local address and bounces with a “no such user” error.
Please post your config values. But I
[root@mail ~]# postconf -n
alias_database = hash:/etc/aliases
alias_maps = hash:/etc/aliases
bounce_queue_lifetime = 2d
broken_sasl_auth_clients = yes
command_directory = /usr/sbin
config_directory = /etc/postfix
daemon_directory = /usr/libexec/postfix
data_directory = /var/lib/postfix
debug_peer_l
On 2022-02-07 13:25, SH Development wrote:
We have a postfix/dovecot/mysql configuration. We recently removed
one of the users from the database, however when we send email, it
still looks like the address we are sending to is a local address
You're sending mail to the address you removed?
a
The user in question was moved to another server on our network. So, in
effect, yes, I was sending to the removed user on another server.
I have sent to the “moved” user from an outside address and it works as
expected.
I believe the issue is that when I send a test email, the moved user was o
On 2022-02-07 21:09, SH Development wrote:
The user in question was moved to another server on our network. So,
This was not stated in the OP.
in effect, yes, I was sending to the removed user on another server.
I have sent to the “moved” user from an outside address and it
works as expecte
28 matches
Mail list logo
