Re: master_wakeup_timer_event

2022-01-17 Thread natan
W dniu 14.01.2022 o 22:18, Wietse Venema pisze: > natan: > Wietse: >> Do you know if the problem is a kernel limit or a per-process limit? >> Does master have 4096 open files (including network sockets: ip, >> unix-domain, etc.). > Wietse: >> BTW that last one was a trick question: you need a huge

Re: master_wakeup_timer_event

2022-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
natan: > W dniu 14.01.2022 o 22:18, Wietse Venema pisze: > > natan: > > Wietse: > >> Do you know if the problem is a kernel limit or a per-process limit? > >> Does master have 4096 open files (including network sockets: ip, > >> unix-domain, etc.). > > Wietse: > >> BTW that last one was a trick que

if/endif header_check

2022-01-17 Thread Jim Popovitch
Hello! I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it isn't. :( I started in #postfix and figured I would follow up here too. The goal is to put mail on HOLD if it is not spam and is destined for 2 role accounts. Any help is much appreciated. ~$ cat header_checks.pcre

Re: master_wakeup_timer_event

2022-01-17 Thread natan
W dniu 17.01.2022 o 15:58, Wietse Venema pisze: > natan: >> W dniu 14.01.2022 o 22:18, Wietse Venema pisze: >>> natan: >>> Wietse: Do you know if the problem is a kernel limit or a per-process limit? Does master have 4096 open files (including network sockets: ip, unix-domain, etc.).

nullmx_reject_code gone from source but not from docs

2022-01-17 Thread Andreas Weigel
Hi everyone, I just had a case which had me looking for said parameter, just to find out that while it's still in the documentation it seems to have been purged from the sources in commit 2bcd79195232042d77b79cbcdbde74f1327e6f8e. Postfix 3.4.19's postconf just gives me a "postconf: warning: /

Re: nullmx_reject_code gone from source but not from docs

2022-01-17 Thread Benny Pedersen
On 2022-01-17 18:08, Andreas Weigel wrote: just gives me a "postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: nullmx_reject_code=553" good its removed imho, there is no point in softfails but regulary dns fails should still give softfails, just not hard configured softfails in main.c

Re: nullmx_reject_code gone from source but not from docs

2022-01-17 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 2022-01-17 18:08, Andreas Weigel wrote: just gives me a "postconf: warning: /etc/postfix/main.cf: unused parameter: nullmx_reject_code=553" http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#nullmx_reject_code This is one of the possible replies from the restrictions reject_unknown_sender_domain and re

Re: master_wakeup_timer_event

2022-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
natan: > W dniu 17.01.2022 o?15:58, Wietse Venema pisze: > > natan: > >> W dniu 14.01.2022 o 22:18, Wietse Venema pisze: > >>> natan: > >>> Wietse: > Do you know if the problem is a kernel limit or a per-process limit? > Does master have 4096 open files (including network sockets: ip, > >

Re: nullmx_reject_code gone from source but not from docs

2022-01-17 Thread Wietse Venema
Andreas Weigel: > Hi everyone, > > I just had a case which had me looking for said parameter, just to find > out that while it's still in the documentation it seems to have been > purged from the sources in commit > 2bcd79195232042d77b79cbcdbde74f1327e6f8e. Postfix 3.4.19's postconf just > giv

Re: if/endif header_check

2022-01-17 Thread Noel Jones
On 1/17/2022 10:12 AM, Jim Popovitch wrote: Hello! I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it isn't. :( I started in #postfix and figured I would follow up here too. The goal is to put mail on HOLD if it is not spam and is destined for 2 role accounts. Any help i

Re: if/endif header_check

2022-01-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-01-17 at 11:12:50 UTC-0500 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 11:12:50 -0500) Jim Popovitch is rumored to have said: I'm trying to get a complex header_check to work, and unfortunately it isn't. Right, because header_check cannot do what you're trying to do, as documented. The 'if' construct in hea

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-17 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>> > One addition: >>> The swaks command line you'll need to test properly will be something like >>> this: >>> >>> swaks -tls -t tar...@example.com --auth-user joea --server >>> mail.example.com:587 >>> >> >> Thanks, that got me over that hump. Test email went through, >> >> Now to transl

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-17 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
>>> >> > > One addition: > >The swaks command line you'll need to test properly will be something like this: swaks -tls -t tar...@example.com --auth-user joea --server mail.example.com:587 >>> >>> Thanks, that got me over that hump. Test email went through, >>> >>>

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-01-17 at 19:40:39 UTC-0500 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 19:40:39 -0500) Joe Acquisto-j4 is rumored to have said: I have per user SASL authentication working, with one rather odd exception for which I do not see a cause. It's a bit convoluted to explain before post that, please just remind me wh

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-17 Thread Bill Cole
On 2022-01-17 at 20:09:55 UTC-0500 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:09:55 -0500) Joe Acquisto-j4 is rumored to have said: Sorry for the garbled message. Looking for the config files, etc that are normally requested. The non-default main.cf settings, formatted for human eyes: postconf -nf The master.c

Re: SASL questions

2022-01-17 Thread Joe Acquisto-j4
> On 2022-01-17 at 20:09:55 UTC-0500 (Mon, 17 Jan 2022 20:09:55 -0500) > Joe Acquisto-j4 > is rumored to have said: > > >> Sorry for the garbled message. Looking for the config files, etc that >> are normally requested. > > > The non-default main.cf settings, formatted for human eyes: > post