On 22.09.21 04:26, Alex wrote:
Yes, thanks. I realize I can do that - it's the
"your_script_that_saves_to_sql" part that would be very helpful :-)
Not sure if there's a one-size-fits-all script that works in all setups,
it's going to be highly individualized.
> There's also great difficulty
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:15:50AM +0200, Sven Schwedas
wrote:
> On 22.09.21 04:26, Alex wrote:
> > Yes, thanks. I realize I can do that - it's the
> > "your_script_that_saves_to_sql" part that would be very helpful :-)
>
> Not sure if there's a one-size-fits-all script that works in all setups
Hi,
I just encountered a wierd thing (debian-11 stable, postfix-3.5.6-1+b1).
I ran:
$ postconf -df proxy_read_maps
proxy_read_maps = $local_recipient_maps $mydestination $virtual_alias_maps
$virtual_alias_domains $virtual_mailbox_maps $virtual_mailbox_domains
$relay_recipient_maps $r
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:35:45PM +1000, raf wrote:
> I just encountered a wierd thing (debian-11 stable, postfix-3.5.6-1+b1).
Thanks for the bug report.
> $ postconf -xdf proxy_read_maps
> proxy_read_maps = all127.0.0.0/8 a.b.c.d/32 [::1]/128
>[a:b:c:d::e]/128 [fe80::]/64 hash:/etc/ali
Hi,
> > Can someone help me troubleshoot why I'm periodically receiving these
> > messages? It results in postfix stop responding to connections
> > altogether.
> >
> > Sep 21 19:18:41 xavier postfix-116/smtpd[2485484]: warning: problem
> > talking to server private/tlsmgr: Connection timed out
>
> On 22 Sep 2021, at 1:11 pm, Alex wrote:
>
>>smtpd_tls_session_cache_database
>
> This is defined to the default for all instances:
> smtpd_tls_session_cache_database =
> btree:/var/lib/postfix/smtpd_tls_session_cache
That's wrong. The session cache needs to be:
smtpd_tls_session_cach
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:35:45PM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > I just encountered a wierd thing (debian-11 stable, postfix-3.5.6-1+b1).
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
>
> > $ postconf -xdf proxy_read_maps
> > proxy_read_maps = all127.0.0.0/8 a.b.c.d/32 [::1]/128
> >[a:b:c:
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 12:56:30PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:35:45PM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > I just encountered a wierd thing (debian-11 stable, postfix-3.5.6-1+b1).
>
> Thanks for the bug report.
Thanks for the fix!
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 07:11:19PM -0400, Wietse Venema
wrote:
> Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:35:45PM +1000, raf wrote:
> >
> > > I just encountered a wierd thing (debian-11 stable, postfix-3.5.6-1+b1).
> >
> > Thanks for the bug report.
> >
> > > $ postconf -xdf proxy_re
On 2021-09-18 6:10 p.m., Christian Schmitz wrote:
On Saturday 18 September 2021 10:13:41 ludic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
pcre header checks we use. Not all the time, depends on spam volume from
these valuable enterprises.
#/sjmedia.us/ REJECT A mass mail service abused by criminals
#/bmsend.c
On 04:41 PM 17-Sep-21, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On 2021-09-17 14:40, Christian Schmitz wrote:
make a spamassassin rule to check dkim, make that dkim score 1000, if
you reject high score spam there is nothing more to do
In this day and age rspamd is much better.
--
Gayatri Hitech,
www.spamcheet
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:28:59AM +1000, raf wrote:
> > Thanks. This is the result of lazy coding in a nasty language.
> > I should stop hidden static buffers, or switch to a language
> > has automatic destructors like C++ or Go.
> >
> > Wietse
>
> or Rust! :-)
We all have our favourite mu
On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 10:52:02PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 09:28:59AM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > > Thanks. This is the result of lazy coding in a nasty language.
> > > I should stop hidden static buffers, or switch to a language
> > > has automatic destructors like
On 23/9/2021 10:34 am, Girish Venkatachalam wrote:
In this day and age rspamd is much better.
I second that.
P.V.Anthony
14 matches
Mail list logo
