Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Aug 11, 2021 at 09:48:24AM +1000, raf wrote:
>
> > If you want postfix to reject a connection immediately
> > after the first SMTP protocol error it encounters,
> > without the need to construct in advance a list of all
> > possible errors, just set smtpd_hard_error_limi
Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
Matt
> On Aug 10, 2021, at 23:01, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2021 at 10:34:52PM -0400, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
>> I have a need to map some destin
> On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
>
> Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
You're looking to exempt specific sender (domains)
Viktor Dukhovni:
> > On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> > sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
>
> No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
>
> You're looking to
On 8/11/21 13:54, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
No such feature fits into a single-key lookup design.
You're looki
On 08-11-2021 4:41 pm, Matt Corallo wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it should still be possible to have a
sender-dependent lookup that happens before transport_maps or
relay_transport_maps? Indeed, I understand that no multi-key lookup
can occur, but the decision could be made first by an opt
Matt Corallo:
>
>
> On 8/11/21 13:54, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> >> On 11 Aug 2021, at 11:00 am, Matt Corallo wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm, well I suppose consider this a feature request for
> >> sender_dependent_relay_transport_maps or sender_dependent_transport_maps :)
> >
> > No such feature fits int
On 8/11/21 16:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
> If the sender address can override the routing, even if the recipient
> would otherwise be delivered locally, then that would be a recipe
> for mailer loops with the potential for mail explosions. This is
> why we have sender_dependent overrides for defa
Matt Corallo:
>
>
> On 8/11/21 16:52, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > If the sender address can override the routing, even if the recipient
> > would otherwise be delivered locally, then that would be a recipe
> > for mailer loops with the potential for mail explosions. This is
> > why we have sende
I tried variations of this but never could get it to work - as far as I could tell the nexthop is fully resolved by the
time we get to the smtp daemon, so there aren't any relevant settings to override or otherwise set the default on the
nexthop there.
Thanks,
Matt
On 8/11/21 17:37, Wietse Ven
10 matches
Mail list logo
