Cross post: Lightmeter Control Center 1.7 release

2021-05-29 Thread Leandro Santiago
(To the list admins, this is a 3rd party software announcement, which I believe to be relevant to Postfix users, but please let me know you consider it as inappropriate use of this list) For those who don't know it yet, Lightmeter Control Center is a web based open source monitoring tool for P

Re: Logging - Connect Order

2021-05-29 Thread Wietse Venema
post...@ptld.com: > Without recompiling postfix, is there a way to get the PTR hostname > warning to come after the connect message in the logs? That would be wrong. As a matter or principle, Postfix logs a warning for a bad condition (for example client name unavailable), before doing somethin

postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Timo Geusch
Hello, I just noticed this particular behaviour as I was trying to track down some issues as apparently my mail server was bouncing legitimate emails from a few senders (including some freebsd mailing lists and also postfix-users as I discovered afterwards). This is on the FreeBSD port of Pos

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Wietse Venema
Timo Geusch: > Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are > actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this > case, their error is that I was querying via a public resolver, see link > here: https://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/DNSBL%20Usage#200 So

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 5/29/21 10:22 AM, Timo Geusch wrote: > Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are > actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this > case, their error is that I was querying via a public resolver, see link > here: https://www.spamhaus.org/faq/sec

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Timo Geusch
On 5/29/21 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: Timo Geusch: Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this case, their error is that I was querying via a public resolver, see link here: https://www.spamhaus.org

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Timo Geusch
On 5/29/21 11:40 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 5/29/21 10:22 AM, Timo Geusch wrote: Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this case, their error is that I was querying via a public resolver, see link

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread David Favor
Wietse Venema wrote: IL Ka: If you want to choose transport based on sender, you probably want "sender_dependent_default_transport_maps" http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_default_transport_maps It seems that this option doesn't support wildcards. Yes it does. Use a

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Laura Smith
On Saturday, 29 May 2021 16:55, Timo Geusch wrote: > On 5/29/21 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > > Timo Geusch: > > > > > Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are > > > actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this > > > case, their error is tha

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread Wietse Venema
David Favor: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ] > Wietse Venema wrote: > > IL Ka: > >>> > If you want to choose transport based on sender, you probably want > "sender_dependent_default_transport_maps" > > > >>> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_default_tra

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:55:02AM -0400, Timo Geusch wrote: > On 5/29/21 11:03 AM, Wietse Venema wrote: > > Timo Geusch: > > > Based on zen.spamhaus.org's documentation 127.255.255.25[245] are > > > actually error codes and not indicators of allow/denylisting - in this > > > case, their error is t

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread David Favor
Wietse Venema wrote: David Favor: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ] Wietse Venema wrote: IL Ka: If you want to choose transport based on sender, you probably want "sender_dependent_default_transport_maps" http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#sender_dependent_default_transport_maps It

Re: Logging - Connect Order

2021-05-29 Thread Shawn Heisey
On 5/28/2021 6:24 PM, post...@ptld.com wrote: Without recompiling postfix, is there a way to get the PTR hostname warning to come after the connect message in the logs? Adding to the reply from Wietse, which I have to agree with: On my Ubuntu 18 mail server, everything that postfix sends to sy

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:30:51AM -0500, David Favor wrote: > # cat /etc/postfix/sender_dependant_default_transport > /.*@davidfavor.com/ : > /.*@fixdeliver.com/ : > /.*/ discard: > > 7) Sending message still allows random sending domains... The transport table only selects a delivery channel,

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread John Levine
According to Bastian Blank : >> Already addressed it, however I figured it would be worth mentioning on here >> as it seem to be a fairly recent change at SpamHaus's end. > >No, it is not a recent change. SpamHaus rejects requests via done >public resolvers since a long time. It is a fairly recen

Re: postscreen appears to be misinterpreting zen.spamhaus.org's error return codes

2021-05-29 Thread Timo Geusch
On 5/29/21 2:19 PM, John Levine wrote: According to Bastian Blank : Already addressed it, however I figured it would be worth mentioning on here as it seem to be a fairly recent change at SpamHaus's end. No, it is not a recent change. SpamHaus rejects requests via done public resolvers since a

Re: Logging - Connect Order

2021-05-29 Thread postfix
On 05-29-2021 1:16 pm, Shawn Heisey wrote: Adding to the reply from Wietse, which I have to agree with: I was just assuming that a connection happens first before postfix could know if the PTR resolves or not. Otherwise how does postfix know a client hostname needs to be checked if it has ne

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread David Favor
Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:30:51AM -0500, David Favor wrote: # cat /etc/postfix/sender_dependant_default_transport /.*@davidfavor.com/ : /.*@fixdeliver.com/ : /.*/ discard: 7) Sending message still allows random sending domains... The transport table only selects a del

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread Wietse Venema
David Favor: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ] > Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:30:51AM -0500, David Favor wrote: > > > >> # cat /etc/postfix/sender_dependant_default_transport > >> /.*@davidfavor.com/ : > >> /.*@fixdeliver.com/ : > >> /.*/ discard: > >> > >> 7) Sending me

Re: Newbie question about transport_maps failing

2021-05-29 Thread David Favor
Wietse Venema wrote: David Favor: [ Charset ISO-8859-1 converted... ] Viktor Dukhovni wrote: On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 11:30:51AM -0500, David Favor wrote: # cat /etc/postfix/sender_dependant_default_transport /.*@davidfavor.com/ : /.*@fixdeliver.com/ : /.*/ discard: 7) Sending message still a