On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:14:45PM +0200, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 16.05.2021 o godz. 13:58:22 Bob Proulx pisze:
> > Chris Green wrote:
> > > I am trying to debug it by connecting directly to port 25 on localhost
> > > using telnet and composing mail that way.
> >
> > I highly recommend "swaks"
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 09:03:25AM +0200, Jeroen Geilman wrote:
>It was not rejected by mail.gandi.net.
>
>If it was rejected by something beyond that, [1]ch...@zmbc.eu would get
>a bounce notification (DSN).
>
>Postfix is not involved in any way.
>
OK, thanks.
--
Chris Green
Dnia 17.05.2021 o godz. 08:52:33 Chris Green pisze:
> >
> > Ubuntu desktop should have Thunderbird preinstalled. Why not just try to
> > send mail using a regular mail client?
>
> Most mail clients will use sendmail rather than SMTP on port 25 (or
> another port) won't they? As I said my postfix
On 17/05/21 9:12 pm, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 17.05.2021 o godz. 08:52:33 Chris Green pisze:
Most mail clients will use sendmail rather than SMTP on port 25 (or
another port) won't they? As I said my postfix works fine for sending
E-Mails from my MUA (mutt) which uses sendmail.
Most *desktop
Dnia 17.05.2021 o godz. 21:55:22 Peter pisze:
>
> Port 465 = submissions = best
> Port 587 with mandatory starttls = submission = acceptable
I would disagree that port 465 with TLS-wrapper around SMTP is better than
port 587 with STARTTLS. It's only your personal opinion. Port 587 with
mandatory
On 17/05/21 10:37 pm, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
I would disagree that port 465 with TLS-wrapper around SMTP is better than
port 587 with STARTTLS. It's only your personal opinion. Port 587 with
mandatory STARTTLS is in no way less secure than TLS-wrapped port 465.
I used to make that argument (see b
Hi,
have you ever got an email containing lots of email addresses including your
own in the TO or CC field or somewhere else in the mail body?
I think, this happens for different reasons:
- people sending emails to many recipients don't know or don't care how
to do that
properly
- people dont'
On 5/17/21 8:00 AM, Magnus Harlander wrote:
> Hi,
>
> have you ever got an email containing lots of email addresses
> including your
> own in the TO or CC field or somewhere else in the mail body?
>
> I think, this happens for different reasons:
>
> - people sending emails to many recipients don't
On 2021-05-17 at 08:00:30 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 May 2021 14:00:30 +0200)
Magnus Harlander
is rumored to have said:
Is this really a good idea?
Not really.
For mail which does not originate within the scope of your authority to
set policy, you would be interfering with the intent of a sender who
Am 17.05.21 um 14:17 schrieb Richard Damon:
> On 5/17/21 8:00 AM, Magnus Harlander wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> have you ever got an email containing lots of email addresses
>> including your
>> own in the TO or CC field or somewhere else in the mail body?
>>
>> I think, this happens for different reasons:
Ivan Avery Frey:
> SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is the
> service name "stmp" hardcoded or is it configurable?
That would be SASL configuration. not Postfix configuration.
Wietse
On 2021-05-17 at 09:32:41 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 May 2021 09:32:41 -0400 (EDT))
Wietse Venema
is rumored to have said:
> Ivan Avery Frey:
>> SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is the
>> service name "stmp" hardcoded or is it configurable?
>
> That would be SASL configuration. no
On 29/4/21 10:44, P V Anthony wrote:
On 27/4/2021 2:11 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keyword_address_maps
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#smtpd_discard_ehlo_keywords
smtpd-ehlo-discard.cidr:
# NetName: MERCK1
#
Bill Cole:
> On 2021-05-17 at 09:32:41 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 May 2021 09:32:41 -0400 (EDT))
> Wietse Venema
> is rumored to have said:
>
> > Ivan Avery Frey:
> >> SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is the
> >> service name "stmp" hardcoded or is it configurable?
> >
> > That wo
On Mon., May 17, 2021, 09:33 Wietse Venema, wrote:
> Ivan Avery Frey:
> > SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is the
> > service name "stmp" hardcoded or is it configurable?
>
> That would be SASL configuration. not Postfix configuration.
I'm sorry I didn't make my questio
Ivan Avery Frey:
> On Mon., May 17, 2021, 09:33 Wietse Venema, wrote:
>
> > Ivan Avery Frey:
> > > SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is the
> > > service name "stmp" hardcoded or is it configurable?
> >
> > That would be SASL configuration. not Postfix configuration.
>
>
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:07:40AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Bill Cole:
> > On 2021-05-17 at 09:32:41 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 May 2021 09:32:41 -0400 (EDT))
> > Wietse Venema
> > is rumored to have said:
> >
> > > Ivan Avery Frey:
> > >> SASL when authenticating via PAM requires a service name. Is
I am setting up a postfix instance as submission only to compliment
dovecot in imap mode.
Is there a way to turn off listening on port 25 and only have submission
listen on 587?
I already know how to bind the submission service to 587 in the
master.cf
I assume listening on 25 is controlled by
post...@ptld.com:
> I am setting up a postfix instance as submission only to compliment
> dovecot in imap mode.
> Is there a way to turn off listening on port 25 and only have submission
> listen on 587?
Comment out the service in master.cf that listens on port 25.
Command: postconf -# -M smtp/
>
>
> I am setting up a postfix instance as submission only to compliment
> dovecot in imap mode.
> Is there a way to turn off listening on port 25 and only have submission
> listen on 587?
> I already know how to bind the submission service to 587 in the
> master.cf
Any service could be commente
New problem, i can not specify two IP's in the master.cf for submission
to bind to.
This works:
127.0.0.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
This works:
[::1]:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
This does not work:
127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
127.0.0.1 [::1]:submission inet n - n
On 5/17/2021 5:20 PM, post...@ptld.com wrote:
New problem, i can not specify two IP's in the master.cf for
submission to bind to.
This works:
127.0.0.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
This works:
[::1]:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
This does not work:
127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission inet n - n
I am setting up a new email server, and I am unable to connect to it with
Icedove, and postfix logs errors when I attempt to do so. I am using
postfix + dovecot + opendkim + spamassassin.
Systemd log:
May 17 15:28:22 gentooserver systemd[1]: Starting Postfix Mail Transport
Agent...
May 17 15:28:2
On 2021-05-17 23:39, post...@ptld.com wrote:
I am setting up a postfix instance as submission only to compliment
dovecot in imap mode.
+1
Is there a way to turn off listening on port 25 and only have
submission listen on 587?
put # in front of smtp line in master.cf should be it
I already
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 05:57:35PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Comment out the service in master.cf that listens on port 25.
>
> Command: postconf -# -M smtp/inet
>
> Result: # smtp inet n ... ... ... ... smtpd
A fancier, but more easily programmatically reversed m
On 2021-05-18 00:29, Noel Jones wrote:
127.0.0.1:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
[::1]:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
localhost:submission inet n - n - - smtpd
imho postfix will accept this aswell, not tested
I noticed in the headers it shows:
dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected)
What does the unprotected part refer to?
Anything to worry about? Something i need to setup or configure?
I googled but didn't find anything, just people talking about why their
dkim didn't pass.
I notice emails from gmail
On 2021-05-17 at 19:02:10 UTC-0400 (Mon, 17 May 2021 18:02:10 -0500)
Nathan Dehnel
is rumored to have said:
I am setting up a new email server, and I am unable to connect to it
with
Icedove, and postfix logs errors when I attempt to do so. I am using
postfix + dovecot + opendkim + spamassassin
It's not dnssec signed.
-Dan Mahoney
> On May 17, 2021, at 6:14 PM, post...@ptld.com wrote:
>
> I noticed in the headers it shows:
>
> dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected)
>
> What does the unprotected part refer to?
> Anything to worry about? Something i need to setup or configure?
> I googl
If i send mail to submission:587 addressed to another user on the same
server, postfix instead of sending the mail to the mx records for that
domain, and connecting to postfix on smtp:25 it bypasses all of that and
delivers directly into that users inbox. This avoids all of my
filtering, smtpd_
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:02:35PM -0400, post...@ptld.com wrote:
> If I send mail to submission:587 addressed to another user on the same
> server, postfix instead of sending the mail to the mx records for that
> domain, and connecting to postfix on smtp:25 it bypasses all of that and
> delive
31 matches
Mail list logo
