Hi list,
We have a postfix server, which forwards all customer's outbound emails
to a "relayhost". Our "relayhost" is somewhat costly, so our goal is to
minimize it's usage. MX is served by separate Postfix instance.
Our goal is to deliver local emails to our MX directly, bypassing
"relayho
On 06.05.21 10:37, Vytenis Adm wrote:
We have a postfix server, which forwards all customer's outbound
emails to a "relayhost". Our "relayhost" is somewhat costly, so our
goal is to minimize it's usage. MX is served by separate Postfix
instance.
Our goal is to deliver local emails to our MX d
On 2021-05-06 12:42, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 06.05.21 10:37, Vytenis Adm wrote:
We have a postfix server, which forwards all customer's outbound
emails to a "relayhost". Our "relayhost" is somewhat costly, so our
goal is to minimize it's usage. MX is served by separate Postfix
insta
On 06.05.21 10:37, Vytenis Adm wrote:
We have a postfix server, which forwards all customer's outbound
emails to a "relayhost". Our "relayhost" is somewhat costly, so
our goal is to minimize it's usage. MX is served by separate
Postfix instance.
Our goal is to deliver local emails to our MX d
Dnia 6.05.2021 o godz. 14:07:55 Vytenis Adm pisze:
>
> Yes, we did look into it, and it's not an option. "transport_maps"
> looks into a DB, and we can't rely on it. Clients can point MX to
> their own servers, and "transport_maps" will route to our MX
> regardless of what is set in customer's DN
> On May 6, 2021, at 8:56 AM, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> "transport_maps" looks into a *map*, and a map in Postfix is more than just
> DB. For example it can be a *TCP table*, which means Postfix is asking some
> program that listens on a specific port for the key, and gets a value in
> return. It
Thanks Matus for taking time to respond. Appreciated.
On 2021-05-06 14:34, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 06.05.21 10:37, Vytenis Adm wrote:
We have a postfix server, which forwards all customer's outbound
emails to a "relayhost". Our "relayhost" is somewhat costly, so our
goal is to mini
On 2021-05-06 15:56, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 6.05.2021 o godz. 14:07:55 Vytenis Adm pisze:
Yes, we did look into it, and it's not an option. "transport_maps"
looks into a DB, and we can't rely on it. Clients can point MX to
their own servers, and "transport_maps" will route to our MX
regard
Dnia 6.05.2021 o godz. 16:37:29 Vytenis Adm pisze:
>
> Indeed. We were thinking about this as well. I was secretly hoping
> there's a built-in solution, avoiding any development.
I would say your case is very unusual, so it's unlikely that there would be
a built-in solution. You must create some
