Hi list,
what the title says actually, I have an alias for all current users
of an SMTP server but
I want to restrict sending to this alias address to some specific
senders only (the actual
users of the domain plus a small group of external senders ).
What I'm I looking for in the doc
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test case.
What I'm uncertain of is if this represents a config error on our side
or a (grossly) misbehaving mail host elsewhere.
The interesting test case is a corre
On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test
case. What I'm uncertain of is if this represents a config error on
our side or a (grossly) misbehaving mail hos
On 4/23/21 3:33 PM, natan wrote:
> for test I send (this same method) from old server (debian8 postfix
> 2.11.x) and works ok
does the old server have another ip address than the new one? Smells to
me that your new server ip maybe blocked at destination
--
Cheers
tobi
something like this?
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal
On 4/26/21 10:11 AM, George Papas wrote:
> Hi list,
>
>
> what the title says actually, I have an alias for all current users
> of an SMTP server but
>
> I want to restrict sending to this alias address to some
Yeap thanks a lot , seems to be configurable cause I also want some
external users also
but thats it I guess.
Thanks again
On 4/26/21 2:46 PM, Tobi wrote:
something like this?
http://www.postfix.org/RESTRICTION_CLASS_README.html#internal
On 4/26/21 10:11 AM, George Papas wrote:
Hi list
On 26/04/2021 12:56, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
>> mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test
>> case. What I'm uncertain of is if this represents a config er
On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 02:31:28PM +0200, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
> Thanks. That's what I thought, too. But this is the strange thing:
> gmail reports that the DKIM signature is good even while complaining
> that DMARC fails. (And so gmail classes as spam, apparently.)
This should only happen if
On 26/04/2021 13:31, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
On 26/04/2021 12:56, Dominic Raferd wrote:
On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging, I've found an interesting test
case. What I'm uncertain
On 26/04/2021 14:46, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> On 26/04/2021 13:31, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
>> On 26/04/2021 12:56, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>>> On 26/04/2021 10:16, Jeff Abrahamson wrote:
I'm seeing a disturbing (but minority) number of hosts that class our
mail is spam. After some digging,
Using freebsd I setup a postfix, dovecot, postgresql and postfixadmin virtual
email server. Everything is working to my satisfaction except email to
root@localhost and my user email to localhost. Having done a lot of
investigation and some trial I'm not finding the answer.
I looked at mydestinat
Subject: How to Easily Set Up a Full-Featured Linux Mail Server on
Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS with iRedMail 1.4.0
Good day from Singapore,
I followed linuxbabe.com's Xiao Guoan's guide and successfully setup a
full featured Linux mail server on Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS with IRedMail
1.4.0.
Author: Mr. Turrito
On 26.04.21 07:41, Michael White wrote:
Using freebsd I setup a postfix, dovecot, postgresql and postfixadmin
virtual email server. Everything is working to my satisfaction except
email to root@localhost and my user email to localhost. Having done a lot
of investigation and some trial I'm not f
Michael White:
> Tried using mail to send root@localhost and get a dead.letter file with the
> message in it.
Postfix does not create dead.letter files.
I suspect that you are still using the Sendmail that comes with
FreeBSD, instead of the Postfix sendmail command.
To switch a FreeBSD system
Ok looking at mailwrapper, looks like its replaces sendmail. Also ran another
test and looked at the maillog as suggested also and sure enough both postfix
and sendmail show up in the log. I though I had disabled sendmail but
apparently not, did not focus on the sendmail messages before. Work
Michael White:
> Apr 26 10:18:20 white-home sendmail[20897]: 13QEIKZE020897: from=x,
> size=53, class=0, nrcpts=1,
> msgid=<20210455561418.13qddde020...@white-home.net>, relay=@localhost
That is NOT POSTFIX.
Wietse
> On Apr 26, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Michael White:
>> Apr 26 10:18:20 white-home sendmail[20897]: 13QEIKZE020897: from=x,
>> size=53, class=0, nrcpts=1,
>> msgid=<20210455561418.13qddde020...@white-home.net>, relay=@localhost
>
> That is NOT POSTFIX.
>
> W
Agreed. Looking at this issue and mailwrapper among other config file issues.
I had set all the options in rc.conf and periodic.conf. mailer.conf still
points to sendmail binaries. I had to use ports to install Postfix to use
PostgreSQL but must not have known to allow ports to change mailer
Hi,
Getting ssl errors for some incoming email domains.
Is there a setting in postfix where we can set like smtp_tls_policy_maps
but for incoming domains instead of outgoing domains?
Currently using
Postfix version: 3.3.1
Centos 8
P.V.Anthony
Hi everyone!
For decades I have used a home brewed "noip" server based on Debian.
Mailing was used to be an exim4 with smarthost setup point to my
internet provider's server. Now this easy life ended, and have decided
build mine "own", what could use my home server as "smarthost".
I do not wan
>
>
> Hi.
Do you have email addresses in different domains? Do you own all these
domains (have access to their DNS configuration etc)?
Do you want to receive emails for these domains?
On 23/04/2021 07:36, Nicky Thomassen wrote:
> With the risk of going off-topic, I do not see the reason for encrypting
> everything on the internet from a more practical point of view, as it just
> gives
> overhead: It takes time to set up and maintain, takes processing power on both
> ends, and
Dnia 26.04.2021 o godz. 23:06:49 Allen Coates pisze:
>
> Also, I understand that HTTPS downloads are a touch faster...
What should be the reason for HTTPS downloads being faster when HTTPS requires
additional encryption and decryption on both sides, which takes CPU time...?
--
Regards,
Jarosl
On 26 Apr 2021, at 17:05, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 26.04.2021 o godz. 23:06:49 Allen Coates pisze:
>>
>> Also, I understand that HTTPS downloads are a touch faster...
>
> What should be the reason for HTTPS downloads being faster when HTTPS requires
> additional encryption and decryption on b
> On Apr 26, 2021, at 8:25 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
>
> It's not the 1990s, encryption and decryption overhead of a stream is not an
> issue, and is more than made up by the fact that the headers and HTML are
> compressed binary blobs instead of sent as plain text.
The Postfix web server returns rat
On 27/4/21 02:53, P.V.Anthony wrote:
Getting ssl errors for some incoming email domains.
Currently using
Postfix version: 3.3.1
Centos 8
I did not give more details of the problem earlier.
Here is the log.
I really need some advice on how to solve this.
The only way to get the emails com
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 01:49:03PM +0800, P.V.Anthony wrote:
> --- start ---
> Apr 27 13:38:06 mail postfix/smtpd[383580]: connect from
> hubie.merck.com[155.91.37.10]
> Apr 27 13:38:07 mail postfix/smtpd[383580]: SSL_accept error from
> hubie.merck.com[155.91.37.10]: Connection
27 matches
Mail list logo
