Might be wrong, but just saw that the https// certificate is missing on
your informatie website?
Best, Jos
-- With both feet on the ground you can't make any step forward
Jos Chrispijn:
> Might be wrong, but just saw that the https// certificate is missing on
> your informatie website?
There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
Wietse
>
>
> There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
>
>
I believe this is about http://www.postfix.org/
There is no https there.
It should be easy to install Letsencrypt certificate there, but I am not
sure if it's worth the effort
Subject: Planning on setting up Postfix + Dovecot + Webmail + Apache +
MariaDB + PHP using Webmin Control Panel in the Cloud
Good day from the Republic of Singapore,
I am planning to setup Postfix Email Server + Dovecot IMAP/POP3
Incoming Mail Server + Webmail (Roundcube or Squirrelmail) + Apache
Hi,
I have postfix configured in a multi-instance setup in conjunction
with amavisd. I'm using always_bcc to create a copy of each email sent
or received.
The problem is that, while postfix appears to deliver the bcc-user
email separately from the other recipients, amavis somehow delivers to
all
On 21/04/2021 16:17, Alex wrote:
I have postfix configured in a multi-instance setup in conjunction
with amavisd. I'm using always_bcc to create a copy of each email sent
or received.
The problem is that, while postfix appears to deliver the bcc-user
email separately from the other recipients, a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:31 AM Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> On 21/04/2021 16:17, Alex wrote:
> > I have postfix configured in a multi-instance setup in conjunction
> > with amavisd. I'm using always_bcc to create a copy of each email sent
> > or received.
> >
> > The problem is that, while pos
It appears that IL Ka said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>
>>
>>
>> There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
>>
>>
>I believe this is about http://www.postfix.org/
>There is no https there.
>
>It should be easy to install Letsencrypt certificate there, but I am not
>sure if it's worth th
Hi,
> > > How do I configure always_bcc to bypass amavisd altogether so it isn't
> > > processed at all?
> > >
> > > # postconf -c /etc/postfix-116 always_bcc
> > > always_bcc = bcc-user
> > >
> > > I'm unsure what postconf details I can provide, so I'll instead just
> > > provide the log entries.
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 11:17:19AM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I have postfix configured in a multi-instance setup in conjunction
> with amavisd. I'm using always_bcc to create a copy of each email sent
> or received.
This does not create a "copy", it adds a recipient to the message.
> The problem is t
> > How do I configure always_bcc to bypass amavisd altogether so it isn't
> > processed at all?
> >
> > # postconf -c /etc/postfix-116 always_bcc
> > always_bcc = bcc-user
> >
> > I'm unsure what postconf details I can provide, so I'll instead just
> > provide the log entries.
> >
> > Apr 21 10:5
Hi,
> >> > > Apr 21 10:58:24 xavier postfix-out/local[2682940]: 19D63305F4A09:
> >> > > to=, relay=local, delay=0.01, delays=0.01/0/0/0,
> >> > > dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (delivered to command: /usr/bin/procmail)
>
> it was delivered - what's the problem?
>
> >> > If you are running amavis as a cont
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:29:07PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> I should have made that more clear. The problem is that I'm trying to
> create an address to which amavisd should forward all mail unfiltered,
> but it only works if either all addresses are included in the policy
> or the unfiltered address
On 21 Apr 2021, at 07:06, IL Ka wrote:
> It should be easy to install Letsencrypt certificate there, but I am not sure
> if it's worth the effort
Since http is starting to be flagged as a security problem and users will be
getting (or may already be getting) scary warnings when loading http, I'
> > I should have made that more clear. The problem is that I'm trying to
> > create an address to which amavisd should forward all mail unfiltered,
> > but it only works if either all addresses are included in the policy
> > or the unfiltered address is the only address.
>
> This is why you have a
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:53:34PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> > This is why you have a multi-instance configuration. You can use the
> > transport table to selectively route specific recipients to specific
> > filter transports, ... by avoiding content_filter and using normal
> > Postfix transport-base
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:53:34PM -0400, Alex wrote:
>
> > > This is why you have a multi-instance configuration. You can use the
> > > transport table to selectively route specific recipients to specific
> > > filter transports, ... by avoiding content_filter and using normal
Wietse Venema:
There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
You mean you don't authorize this site to use the Postfix name?
Don't understand, too cryptic.
Best, Jos
-- With both feet on the ground you can't make any step forward
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:08:37PM +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> > There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
>
> You mean you don't authorize this site to use the Postfix name?
> Don't understand, too cryptic.
As stated there is no postfix.org website:
$ curl http:/
Perhaps I’m wrong here but I think Wietse meant www.postfix.org vs.
just postfix.org — as in only the former exists…
- - -
On 21 Apr 2021, at 13:08, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
Wietse Venema:
There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
You mean you don't authorize this sit
> > > I'm currently using the default_transport to route mail to 10025 for
> > > amavisd. Would I then just use the local transport for local mail then
> > > define it in the transport file?
> >
> > No, because presumably the Bcc mail is supposed to be delivered
> > somewhere else via SMTP. Instea
Wietse:
> Postfix instance 1
>
> main.cf
> always_bcc = f...@example.com
>
> transport_maps
> f...@example.com -> Postfix instance 2
> all other mail -> content filter -> Postfix instance 2
>
> Perhaps a picture is worth 1e3 words.
Alex:
> Does this mean modifying my existing default_t
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 10:08:37PM +0200, Jos Chrispijn wrote:
> > There is neither a service at port 443, nor a postfix.org website.
>
> You mean you don't authorize this site to use the Postfix name?
> Don't understand, too cryptic.
As stated there is no postfix.org website:
$ curl http
Hi,
> Wietse:
> > Postfix instance 1
> >
> > main.cf
> > always_bcc = f...@example.com
> >
> > transport_maps
> > f...@example.com -> Postfix instance 2
> > all other mail -> content filter -> Postfix instance 2
> >
> > Perhaps a picture is worth 1e3 words.
>
> Alex:
> > Does this mean
Alex:
> > It is more or less Viktor's suggestion.
> >
> > Some details will be missing: relay_domains needs to be set u so
> > that Postfix instance 1 won't reject mail with "relay access denied".
>
> Thanks for sticking with me here. That's a pretty big change for me.
> Victor helped me create th
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 04:19:52PM -0400, Alex wrote:
> > > I thought I said transport...
> >
> > Postfix instance 1
> >
> > main.cf
> > always_bcc = f...@example.com
> >
> > transport_maps
> > f...@example.com -> Postfix instance 2
> > all other mail -> content filter -> Postfix insta
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Chrome shows it as "Not secure" followed by postfix.com by gracefully hiding
> the implied www.
I think you meant to write "by disgracefully hiding...".
--
Viktor.
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:02 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Certificate Postfix.org missing?
> On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
>
> Chrome shows it as "Not secure" followed b
Hi,
> > > > I thought I said transport...
> > >
> > > Postfix instance 1
> > >
> > > main.cf
> > > always_bcc = f...@example.com
> > >
> > > transport_maps
> > > f...@example.com -> Postfix instance 2
> > > all other mail -> content filter -> Postfix instance 2
> > >
> > > Perhaps a pi
On 2021-04-21 21:46, @lbutlr wrote:
In addition, if you use https and HTTP/2 the site wiil be faster and
use less bandwidth.
Win, win, win.
postfix website could be served with gopher://
if we want to be serious :=)
On 22/04/2021 10:32 am, Gary Smith wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org On
Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:02 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Certificate Postfix.org missing?
On Apr 21, 2021, at 4:34 PM, Gary Smith wrote:
Chr
On 2021-04-22 04:06, Nick Tait wrote:
On 22/04/2021 10:32 am, Gary Smith wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org
On Behalf Of Viktor Dukhovni
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:02 PM
To: Postfix users
Subject: Re: Certificate Postfix.org missing?
On Apr 21, 20
32 matches
Mail list logo
