>>
smtpd_tls_exclude_ciphers=MD5,SRP,PSK,aDSS,kECDH,kDH,SEED,IDEA,RC2,RC5,RC4,3DES
>> smtpd_tls_mandatory_exclude_ciphers=aNULL
>
>Mostly harmless, but not necessary.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:53:09PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
yes, but when the policy is encryption required for cl
Dnia 29.01.2021 o godz. 19:29:14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
yes, but OTOH I'm not sure if fetchmail or getmail support single mail for
multiple recipients.
On 29.01.21 22:24, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
From fetchmail website:
"Fetchmail can be used as a POP/IMAP-to-SMTP gateway for an entire DNS
On 30/01/2021 18:53, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>> Dnia 29.01.2021 o godz. 19:29:14 Matus UHLAR - fantomas pisze:
>>> yes, but OTOH I'm not sure if fetchmail or getmail support single
>>> mail for
>>> multiple recipients.
>
> On 29.01.21 22:24, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>>> From fetchmail website:
>>
On 12/18/20 8:38 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
> On 16 Dec 2020, at 04:14, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>> /etc/postfix/reject_domains:
>>
>> /@abcd\.biz$/ DUNNO
>> /\.bid$/ REJECT We reject all .bid domains
>> /\.biz$/ REJECT We reject all .biz domains
>
> I do this:
>
> /.*automators\.fm$/ DUNNO
> /.*counter\.s
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 06:49:42PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:53:09PM +0100, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >> yes, but when the policy is encryption required for client-server
> >> connections, aNULL would break that IIUC
> >> - please correct me if I'm wr
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 01:20:13PM -0500, Phil Stracchino wrote:
> I'm looking at implementing a rule to discard all
> four-letter-and-above TLDs except whitelisted ones, because I'm tired
> of playing whack-a-mole.
I'd like to strongly advise against filtering by TLD. This is a very
low quality
Messages log this error
, relay=none, delay=1.2, delays=0.15/0.01/1/0, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced
(unable to look up host host.domain.com: No address associated with
hostname)
However, DNS resolution works as expected and has a PTR record associated
with it.
Any pointers would be greatly appreci
Daniel Armando Rodriguez wrote:
> , relay=none, delay=1.2, delays=0.15/0.01/1/0, dsn=5.3.0, status=bounced
> (unable to look up host host.domain.com: No address associated with
> hostname)
>
> However, DNS resolution works as expected and has a PTR record associated
> with it.
It is very common f
On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 09:39:01PM -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
> My best guess is that your chroot does not have a working resolv.conf file.
Certainly a good place to start. The only odd detail is that the errors
are 5.3.0 errors, so the lookup returned a definitive "no such host",
rather than just
