kawakami:
> Aug 3 15:10:11 dummy postfix/smtpd[5254]: connect from
> example.com[X.X.X.X]:56925
Today is September 3.
If you want support, provide the configuration you have NOW, and
logging that you get NOW with that configuration.
postconf -n
postconf -P
logging
If you can't reproduce the
On 3 Sep 2020, at 0:34, Marcel de Riedmatten wrote:
Le mercredi 02 septembre 2020 à 23:11 -0400, Bill Cole a écrit :
On 2 Sep 2020, at 19:58, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 07:09:28PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
I do not understand why Postfix didn't see that as a reason to gi
On 3 Sep 2020, at 0:43, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Wed, Sep 02, 2020 at 11:11:32PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Yes, I see the same:
[root@be03 ~]# dig @127.0.0.1 _25._tcp.mail.deaecom.gov. tlsa
That's NOT the same, you're not asking for "+dnssec", which Postfix
does
do when resolving D
On Thu, Sep 03, 2020 at 06:09:23PM -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
> > Your resolver claims to have validated the answer (the AD bit is set),
> > what do you get with "posttls-finger"?
>
> [root@be03 ~]# posttls-finger mail.deaecom.gov
> posttls-finger: Connected to mail.deaecom.gov[149.101.26.25]:25
>
