On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:51:42AM +0100, dave wrote:
> Maybe I need to clarify a few things. My email server is not in my home
> network. My raspberry is, and it gets random IPs as sometimes it has to
> go through a VPN to the internet.
>
> Mail to my own domains is not permitted by default. T
Thanks Viktor, that looks good.
regards
Dave
On 01/09/2020 08:38, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:51:42AM +0100, dave wrote:
Maybe I need to clarify a few things. My email server is not in my home
network. My raspberry is, and it gets random IPs as sometimes it has to
go th
On 2020-08-30 22:33 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Well almost: it needs a custom SMTP client to avoid loop detection.
>
> /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> pickup unix .. .. .. .. .. pickup
> -o { content_filter = local-smtp:[localhost]:25 }
>
> local-smtp unix .. .. .. .. .. smtp
>
On 31 Aug 2020, at 07:34, Wietse Venema wrote:
> [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.5.7.html]
Is there a what's new/changelog document for this version or is it mostly just
incremental improvements on 3.5.6 and I should
@lbutlr:
> On 31 Aug 2020, at 07:34, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> > http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.5.7.html]
>
> Is there a what's new/changelog document for this version or is it =
> mostly just incremental improvements
Hello!
I try to understand different mail delivery times.
I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail server.
The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script uses
SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open.
If my client IP is part of mynetworks the t
On 01 Sep 2020, at 06:30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> So I’m wondering why I have such a big time difference.
You would have to look deeper at the logs and see where the delay is being
introduced. This might be hard as it is 3/10th of a second per message.
It could be as simple as the remote severin
Stephan Seitz:
> Hello!
>
> I try to understand different mail delivery times.
>
> I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail server.
> The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script uses
> SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open.
>
> If my client
Wietse Venema:
> @lbutlr:
> > On 31 Aug 2020, at 07:34, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > > [An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
> > > http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.5.7.html]
> >
> > Is there a what's new/changelog document for this version or is it =
> > mostly j
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:27:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Stephan Seitz:
If my client IP is part of mynetworks the time for 500 mails is about
29 seconds.
That's 5.8ms per delivery.
If [not in mynetworks] the time is about 47 seconds.
That's 9.4ms per delivery. Looks like your network roun
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:18:44 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
It could be as simple as the remote severing taking very slightly longer
to process for reasons on its end (slower lookup into its tables from
the secure ports, for example).
I used port 25 for both tests, so that I could hope to avoid diff
On 01 Sep 2020, at 07:37, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:18:44 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
>> It could be as simple as the remote severing taking very slightly longer to
>> process for reasons on its end (slower lookup into its tables from the
>> secure ports, for example).
>
> I us
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 07:46:26 -0600, @lbutlr wrote:
Do you control the target server? If not, then you have no idea what
Yes, I do control the server. This is a simple setup, no spamfilter or
such things. And yes, besides the fact that in one case the sasl user is
logged there aren’t any ot
Stephan Seitz:
> On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 09:27:03 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >Stephan Seitz:
> >> If my client IP is part of mynetworks the time for 500 mails is about
> >> 29 seconds.
> >That's 5.8ms per delivery.
> >
> >> If [not in mynetworks] the time is about 47 seconds.
> >That's 9.4ms per
Souji Thenria:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to set up a postfix send-only server, and still be
> able to connect from the out side to it?
Connect to a Postfix SMTP server and do what: send email to it?
Yes, that is possible. There are many ways to limit which clients
can send email to a Postfix SMTP
On 1 Sep 2020, at 8:30, Stephan Seitz wrote:
Hello!
I try to understand different mail delivery times.
I have a script (phpmailer) that sends 500 mails to a remote mail
server. The target address is a local /dev/null mailbox. The script
uses SMTPKeepAlive = true; to keep the connection open
On Di, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:59:05 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
Did you test by changing the value of $mynetworks and using the same
source machine or are the SASL and $mynetworks sources physically
different machines?
No, of course it was the same machine. I’m very sorry, I thought that
would be obv
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:30:05PM +0200, Stephan Seitz wrote:
> I try to understand different mail delivery times.
Sure, that's a quantitative analysis, and doing requires looking in
detail at the delivery latencies in the logs of both client and server.
To get help with this, you'll need to pos
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 04:39:48PM +0200, Souji Thenria wrote:
> To be more detailed:
> In my case I have two servers, and I want one to recieve mails and the
> other should only send mails. So I installed postfix on both servers
> and dovecot on the one which should be able to recieve the mails.
Hi,
is there a way to set up a postfix send-only server, and still be able to
connect from the out side to it?
When I serched this topic all I found was setting the "inet_interfaces =
loopback-only", but than I would only be able to send mails from the localhost
(the postfix server it self).
T
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:28:33PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> On 2020-08-30 22:33 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Well almost: it needs a custom SMTP client to avoid loop detection.
> >
> > /etc/postfix/master.cf:
> > pickup unix .. .. .. .. .. pickup
> > -o { content_filter = local-smtp:[lo
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> > smtp-sndmail
> > unix - - y - - smtp
> >-o { inet_interfaces = }
> >-o { myhostname = smtp-sndmail }
> >-o { bounce_service_name = bounce-discard }
>
> Setting the bounce servi
On 2020-09-01 19:45 BST, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
> I hope you also saw my note re various legitimate use-cases for
> "unexpected" "From:" addresses in local submission.
I did, thank you. I don't think those cases apply to me (no vacation
replies and no forwarding here).
> > smtp-sndmail
> >
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 02:45:50PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> > > smtp-sndmail
> > > unix - - y - - smtp
> > >-o { inet_interfaces = }
> > >-o { myhostname = smtp-sndmail }
> > >-o { bounce_service_name = bounce-discard
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 08:59:19PM +0100, Nick wrote:
> > See above, this does not work.
>
> (I've since removed '-o bounce_service_name=...', it doesn't seem to
> matter here.) Again, it works well enough for me - a mail with a forged
> header-from goes into the hold queue and nowhere else.
It
On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 05:22:30PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > FWIW, the following is not explained as clearly in the Postfix
> > documentation as one might wish, and it would be good to have better
> > coverage of this topic in the docs (in the appropriate places):
> >
> > - What is a de
On Mon, 31 Aug 2020, Noel Jones wrote:
Staring at postconf (or somewhat easier, postconf -n) output is unlikely to
fix this without clues in the log of what the problem is.
Start here:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#logging
If you need more help from us:
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG
27 matches
Mail list logo
