Hi everybody,
I have a postfix server that is serving two domains, a main domain
(domainA.org) and a hosted domain (domainB.org), that is using dovecot
for authentication and lmtp. I have set up an openldap to be used as a
backend for the managed identities. Currently, all @domainB.org
addres
Hi,
I'm likely overlooking this (I'm still digging), but do the restrictions
in smtpd_relay_restrictions apply before the rewriting configured for
canonical_maps takes place?
I'm trying to rewrite the sender address for a system before its mail is
relayed and it appears that the reject_non_f
deoren:
> Hi,
>
> I'm likely overlooking this (I'm still digging), but do the restrictions
> in smtpd_relay_restrictions apply before the rewriting configured for
> canonical_maps takes place?
Before. The smtpd_mumble_restrictions peek at the canonical and
virtual maps to determine if the befor
Hi,
I have postfix-3.5.2 on fedora and trying to strip internal submission
headers using the cleanup service and can't get it working.
In master.cf:
auth-cleanup unix n - - - 0 cleanup
-o syslog_name=postfix/auth-cleanup
-o header_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/aut
> > I looked for domains that *are not* using the outlook: transport but
> > are using the outlook.com relay servers. There are 383 such domains
> > -- the vast majority are one email address per domain. These domains
> > are competing for the limited number of outlook.com connections and
> > the
John Regan skrev den 2020-08-01 21:23:
In master.cf [3]:
auth-cleanup unix n - - - 0 cleanup
-o syslog_name=postfix/auth-cleanup
-o header_checks=pcre:/etc/postfix/auth_header_checks.pcre
header_checks is port 25 incomming, not outgoing
What am I doing w
Greg Sims:
> > > I looked for domains that *are not* using the outlook: transport but
> > > are using the outlook.com relay servers. There are 383 such domains
> > > -- the vast majority are one email address per domain. These domains
> > > are competing for the limited number of outlook.com conn
> > I changed master.cf to 3 processes for outlook: in hopes of reducing
> > MaxConnections feedback -- I can not go much smaller.
>
> This has been asked before: when Outlook puts you in the penalty
> box and starts ratelimiting your new connections, was that because
> a) you exceeded a limit for
