Me to. There is something about writing out your problem in detail that
provides a moment of clarity.
On 5/9/20 1:40 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
On 08 May 2020, at 02:54, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
ups ... I think I can answer my own question?
Why is it that the answer mostly comes once the email has bee
Thomas Quinot:
> * Wietse Venema, 2020-05-08 :
>
> > > As far as I can tell, support for issuer and subject CN lookup
> > > was removed on 20200316. Is my understanding correct that support
> >
> > As far as I know it was never implemented.
>
> Sorry, I probably misunderstood the code while read
Hello,
I am using Postfix on Debian. I have noticed that my mail logs are not
being rotated.
I see that there is no rule in my /etc/logrotate.d/ for rotating mail logs.
Which program's responsibility is it?
Is it supposed to come with Postfix, or is this the responsibility of
the operating sys
On 2020-05-09 15:28 BST, Fourhundred Thecat wrote:
> I am using Postfix on Debian. I have noticed that my mail logs are not
> being rotated.
>
> I see that there is no rule in my /etc/logrotate.d/ for rotating mail logs.
>
> Which program's responsibility is it?
In my debian 10 machines, it's co
Fourhundred Thecat:
> Hello,
>
> I am using Postfix on Debian. I have noticed that my mail logs are not
> being rotated.
>
> I see that there is no rule in my /etc/logrotate.d/ for rotating mail logs.
>
> Which program's responsibility is it?
If the log is written by (r)syslogd, you must use th
>
> On May 9, 2020, at 9:45 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>
> If the log is written by Postfix you must use "postfix logrotate".
> This ensures that Postfix stops writing to a file before it is
> compressed.
>
> Wietse
I hate to even suggest I found a bug with Postfix, but I think I found
* Wietse Venema, 2020-05-09 :
> It was implemented in and removed from the un_stable Postfix release.
Thanks for confirming this!
> If you want to avoid incompatible changes, use a stable Postfix
> release instead.
Sure, that's perfectly fair, and I'm not complaining about the
removal of the f
Thomas Quinot:
> * Wietse Venema, 2020-05-09 :
>
> > It was implemented in and removed from the un_stable Postfix release.
>
> Thanks for confirming this!
>
> > If you want to avoid incompatible changes, use a stable Postfix
> > release instead.
>
> Sure, that's perfectly fair, and I'm not com
OK... will keep that in mind and next time just write down my question
in an email but won't send.
perhaps the answer will come ;)
Am 09.05.2020 um 15:07 schrieb Thomas Strike:
Me to. There is something about writing out your problem in detail
that provides a moment of clarity.
On 5/9/20 1:40
