>> Below is the PCRE that I came up with to catch the offending messages,
>> without blocking other correspondence (the contacts and their
>> organizations are likely to use Google's SMTP for their regular
>> emails):
>>
>> /^Return-Path:(.+)(calendar-server.bounces.google.com)(.*)/ REJECT No
>
Hello everybody,
as a completely postfix noob, I need your help.
I have a Ciphermail / Djigzo Appliance, which encrypts and decrypts mails.
INTERNET <---> SMTP/25 Ciphermail <--> SMTP/25 Mailserver
this works.
I also have a Kaspersky Secure Mail Gateway as Antivirus and Spam
protection, running
Dear postfix users,
I have setup dovecot with quota warning.
The quota warning email is send via Dovecot LDA
(https://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA)
This is the command in the shell script:
/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f nore...@beckspaced.com -d $USER -o
"plugin/quota=dict:User quota::noenforcing:
Am 08.05.2020 um 10:38 schrieb Admin Beckspaced:
Dear postfix users,
I have setup dovecot with quota warning.
The quota warning email is send via Dovecot LDA
(https://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA)
This is the command in the shell script:
/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f nore...@beckspaced.com -d $US
Hi,
> The quota warning email is send via Dovecot LDA (https://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA)
>
> This is the command in the shell script:
>
> /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f nore...@beckspaced.com -d $USER -o
> "plugin/quota=dict:User quota::noenforcing:proxy::quota"
as you said the dovecot quota warn
Hi Wietse,
I have a question to your hint using a null SMTP based listener.
I am Using Ciphermail as an encryption gateway.
Pre-Queue mails are send to an external milter for Spam/Virus Checks.
After that, post-queue, the encryption gateway is a content_filter.
I am looking for a solution to re
Hi,
The quota warning email is send via Dovecot LDA (https://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA)
This is the command in the shell script:
/usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot-lda -f nore...@beckspaced.com -d $USER -o
"plugin/quota=dict:User quota::noenforcing:proxy::quota"
as you said the dovecot quota warning calls
Maxim Nikulin:
> Sorry, I narrowed down context too much, My question was on
> shlib_directory, so I assumed that "..." is a proper substitution
> for all other variables. By the way, I noticed that queue_directory
> and data_directory are passed to "make non-interactive-package"
> but not to "post
Hey folks,
for inexplicable reasons i don't get any results from zen.spamhaus.org anymore:
Apr 08 16:20:29 [postfix/dnsblog] warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error
for DNS query x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org: Host or domain name not found.
Name service error for name=x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org type=A: Hos
On Fri, 8 May 2020 at 16:09, Alexander Meinhardt
wrote:
> for inexplicable reasons i don't get any results from zen.spamhaus.org
> anymore:
>
> Apr 08 16:20:29 [postfix/dnsblog] warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error
> for DNS query x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org: Host or domain name not found.
> Name se
Alexander Meinhardt:
> Hey folks,
>
> for inexplicable reasons i don't get any results from zen.spamhaus.org
> anymore:
>
> Apr 08 16:20:29 [postfix/dnsblog] warning: dnsblog_query: lookup error
> for DNS query x.x.x.x.zen.spamhaus.org: Host or domain name not found.
> Name service error for nam
> A possible cause is that you are not using your own DNS resolver but
> instead relying on a third party (such as your ISP), and their
> resolver has been blocked by Spamhaus for over-usage. In which case
> you need to set up your own DNS resolver (e.g. bind) and use this
> instead, ensuring it do
Hi
Can a postfix smtp client be made to send xclient data to a xclient
enabled local smtpd service ?
Regards Paul
With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am taking a
deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have a
default file path that it looks to or does it just not look at alias_maps if not declare
With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am taking a
deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have a
default file path that it looks to or does it just not look at alias_maps if not declare
>> Does the 'test' address work? See
>> https://www.spamhaus.org/faq/section/DNSBL%20Usage#366
>>
>> $ dig +short 2.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org @DNS.server
>>
>> for relevant values of 'DNS.server' including 127.0.0.1.
>
> dig @127.0.0.1 1.0.0.127.zen.spamhaus.org +short
> ; <<>> DiG 9.14.8 <<>>
Hi,
postconf -d alias_maps will show the default.
Regards,
D.
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org]
On Behalf Of Thomas Strike
Sent: Friday, May 08, 2020 19:24
To: postfix-us...@cloud9.net
Subject: Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf?
> With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am taking a
> deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
> Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have a
> default file path that it looks to or does it just not look at alias_maps if
> n
Hi all,
I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here: Is
it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
"mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records in the
DNS, no A / ipv4 anymore?
Michael
- EOM for impatien
* Wietse Venema, 2019-05-18 :
> smtpd_mumble_restrictions =
> ...
> check_ccert_access {
> maptype:mapname, { search_order = cert_fingerprint,
> pubkey_fingerprint, subject, issuer }
> }
> ...
>
> Where subject (or issuer) will search maptype:mapname for a match
On 8 May 2020, at 12:12, Thomas Strike wrote:
With all the problems that I'm having with my Postfix setup, I am
taking a deeper dive into the meaning of each parameter declaration.
Is it necessary to declare "alias_maps" in the main.cf or does it have
a default file path that it looks to or doe
Hi,
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records in the
> DNS, no A / ipv4 anymore?
I would not yet advise to run
On 08/05/2020 17:38, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6 records i
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:38:32PM +0200, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users here:
> Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6 only? E.g
> "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only
Can these be different - e.g. smtpd listens on 0.0.0.0 and [::], while
submission listens on 127.0.0.1 and [::1]?
Adding '-o inet_interfaces=loopback-only' in master.cf under the
submission service then restarting postfix made no difference, according
to 'ss'.
Thanks
--
Nick
Thomas Quinot:
> * Wietse Venema, 2019-05-18 :
>
> > smtpd_mumble_restrictions =
> > ...
> > check_ccert_access {
> > maptype:mapname, { search_order = cert_fingerprint,
> > pubkey_fingerprint, subject, issuer }
> > }
> > ...
> >
> > Where subject (or issuer) will
Nick:
> Can these be different - e.g. smtpd listens on 0.0.0.0 and [::], while
> submission listens on 127.0.0.1 and [::1]?
>
> Adding '-o inet_interfaces=loopback-only' in master.cf under the
> submission service then restarting postfix made no difference, according
> to 'ss'.
master.cf setting
On 2020-05-08 18:41 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> master.cf settings override main.cf settings, and main.cf settings
> override built-in default settings.
>
> You can configure Postfix receive email on any IP address, as long
> as the IP address is configured (as primary or alias).
I'll try again a
Paul:
> Hi
>
> Can? a postfix smtp client be made to? send xclient data to a xclient
> enabled local smtpd service ?
This is not documented, therefore not supported.
Also:
$ postconf -H | grep 'smtp_.*xclient'
produces no output, whereas
$ postconf -H | grep 'smtp_.*xforward'
does.
Nick:
> On 2020-05-08 18:41 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > master.cf settings override main.cf settings, and main.cf settings
> > override built-in default settings.
> >
> > You can configure Postfix receive email on any IP address, as long
> > as the IP address is configured (as primary or alias).
External smtp servers time out after tls v1.2 is established. the
following is from the maillog;
May 8 17:40:48 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: connect from
unknown[185.50.149.12]
May 8 17:40:50 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: Anonymous TLS
connection established from unkno
On 2020-05-08 18:59 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick:
> > Can postfix be configured such that it changes to
> >
> > 127.0.0.1:submission
> >0.0.0.0:smtp
> >
> > (and similarly for ipv6)?
>
> If you want two services to listen on different IP addresses, then
> that requires an override in ma
Nick:
> On 2020-05-08 18:59 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Nick:
> > > Can postfix be configured such that it changes to
> > >
> > > 127.0.0.1:submission
> > >0.0.0.0:smtp
> > >
> > > (and similarly for ipv6)?
> >
> > If you want two services to listen on different IP addresses, then
> > tha
On 8 May 2020, at 12:38, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
records in the
On 2020-05-08 19:26 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You need to specify the IP address override as
>
> 127.0.0.1:submission .. .. .. .. .. .. smtpd
>
> in master.cf.
That works for ipv4 and "[::1]:submission ..." works for ipv6. I'm
further than I was, thanks.
Is there a way to make it
On 08.05.20 13:01, Thomas Strike wrote:
Subject: mail from external servers connecting but timing out after tls
established. t.s.
External smtp servers time out after tls v1.2 is established. the
following is from the maillog;
May 8 17:40:48 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: connect f
On 08.05.20 13:01, Thomas Strike wrote:
Subject: mail from external servers connecting but timing out after tls
established. t.s.
External smtp servers time out after tls v1.2 is established. the
following is from the maillog;
May 8 17:40:48 sleepyvalley postfix/smtps/smtpd[17534]: connect
Nick:
> On 2020-05-08 19:26 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You need to specify the IP address override as
> >
> > 127.0.0.1:submission .. .. .. .. .. .. smtpd
> >
> > in master.cf.
>
> That works for ipv4 and "[::1]:submission ..." works for ipv6. I'm
> further than I was, thanks.
>
* Bill Cole:
> Some have IPv6 connectivity and address space but no motivation to
> make their mail systems use IPv6.
A case of what we call Public Servant Mikado (whoever moves first has
lost). ;-) Seriously, I think that if one can support IPv6, one should
do it. Good hosting services and ISPs
On 2020-05-08 20:03 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick:
> > Is there a way to make it work for both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time?
> > I tried "127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission ..." but postfix wouldn't start.
>
> See: http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
I think I found the way, which is to repeat the
On Fri, May 08, 2020 at 06:38:32PM +0200, michae...@rocketmail.com wrote:
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
> recor
Nick:
> On 2020-05-08 20:03 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Nick:
> > > Is there a way to make it work for both ipv4 and ipv6 at the same time?
> > > I tried "127.0.0.1,[::1]:submission ..." but postfix wouldn't start.
> >
> > See: http://www.postfix.org/master.5.html
>
> I think I found the way, w
On 2020-05-08 20:15 BST, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Nick:
> > I think I found the way, which is to repeat the entire submission
> > definition in master.cf and c h a n g e the a d d r e s s [my previous
> > post was bounced so I'm trying those words with spaces]. If there is a
> > more succinct way, t
On Sat, May 18, 2019 at 11:01:28AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> After a week of testing, Postfix snapshot 20190518 implements support
> for:
>
> smtpd_mumble_restrictions =
> ...
> check_ccert_access {
> maptype:mapname, { search_order = cert_fingerprint,
> pubkey_finge
Bill Cole wrote:
> michaelof wrote:
> > I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> > here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> > only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp.example.com" with only ipv6
> > records in the DNS, no A / ipv4 anym
On 8 May 2020, at 15:06, Ralph Seichter wrote:
* Bill Cole:
Some have IPv6 connectivity and address space but no motivation to
make their mail systems use IPv6.
A case of what we call Public Servant Mikado (whoever moves first has
lost). ;-)
Yes.
Seriously, I think that if one can suppor
Matus: your right. I misused the word server. I thought that this was the test
message being sent with gmail because every time I sent a new test, this IP
came up in the maillog.
This turns out to be a Russian IP. Geez, Louise! I have Russia trying to hack
me.
Bob Proulx:
> How are working and available IPv6 DNSBLs progressing? That's a
> critical component which I would love to hear is no longer a missing
> component.
zen.spamhaus.org blocks some 15% of IPv6 spam for me. The other 85%
comes from large providers (outlook.com, gmail.com, etc) that aren'
Am Freitag, den 08.05.2020, 15:51 -0500 schrieb Thomas Strike:
> Matus: your right. I misused the word server. I thought that this was
> the test message being sent with gmail because every time I sent a
> new test, this IP came up in the maillog.
> This turns out to be a Russian IP. Geez, Louise!
* Bill Cole:
> The boutique hosting/connectivity/services provider I work with [...]
> can provide native IPv6 to customers. None ever has ever asked for it.
That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
For years I have asked every provider I have worked with if they offe
In message <2eb09baa-5327-b615-47a9-0c1402385...@rocketmail.com>
"michae...@rocketmail.com" writes:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've a generic question to all more experienced than me postfix users
> here: Is it nowadays (reasonable) possible to run postfix with IPv6
> only? E.g "mail.example.com" and "smtp
>On postfix itself you can use regular blocklists to prevent such
obvious IPs.
For the other services like imap etc. it helps to use fail2ban.
I have all filtering that I know of off right now. I am just trying to
establish incoming communication with other SMTP clients right now. Once I get
On 8 May 2020, at 17:26, Ralph Seichter wrote:
> * Bill Cole:
>
>> The boutique hosting/connectivity/services provider I work with [...]
>> can provide native IPv6 to customers. None ever has ever asked for it.
>
> That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
Calling some
I installed PostfixAdmin with postfix and mariadb. After PostfixAdmin
set up the database, I populated it with adding domains and users
through the PostfixAdmin web interface. It seemed to write all the data
required to all the tables except the alias_domain table which is empty.
Does Postfix u
* Wietse Venema, 2020-05-08 :
> > As far as I can tell, support for issuer and subject CN lookup
> > was removed on 20200316. Is my understanding correct that support
>
> As far as I know it was never implemented.
Sorry, I probably misunderstood the code while reading it.
For the record, the cha
* Bill Cole:
>> That's quite a sweeping statement, and I don't believe it to be true.
>
> Calling someone a liar is a very effective way to end a conversation.
Don't know if Trump supporter or trolling... I am a scientist, and thus
do not consider your claim to be true until you prove it. I have
On 08/05/2020 21:58, Wietse Venema wrote:
> Bob Proulx:
>> How are working and available IPv6 DNSBLs progressing? That's a
>> critical component which I would love to hear is no longer a missing
>> component.
>
> zen.spamhaus.org blocks some 15% of IPv6 spam for me. The other 85%
> comes from
On 08 May 2020, at 02:54, Admin Beckspaced wrote:
> ups ... I think I can answer my own question?
> Why is it that the answer mostly comes once the email has been sent ;)
Because if it came before, you wouldn’t sent the message! (90% of the email
questions I write are never sent, hard to believe
58 matches
Mail list logo
