Re: saslauthd problem

2020-04-18 Thread N KN
Hi Becki, Thanks for the answer. I'm however trying to use the PAM way, because using the auxprop method involves storing user passwords in plain text, which I'd like to avoid. I can't seem to find a way to tell the smtpd.conf file to encrypt passwords, and as per the Postfix documentation it seem

Re: PATCH: Glibc-2.31 DNSSEC and GCC 10

2020-04-18 Thread Wietse Venema
Rich Felker: > > It would be a mistake to use TLSA records from an unsigned domain. > > That would be no more secure than accepting a random server > > certificate. All the pain of doing TLSA and none of the gain, just > > security theatre. > > It's not security theater. It (1) ensures that you do

Re: PATCH: Glibc-2.31 DNSSEC and GCC 10

2020-04-18 Thread Rich Felker
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:59:51AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote: > Rich Felker: > > > It would be a mistake to use TLSA records from an unsigned domain. > > > That would be no more secure than accepting a random server > > > certificate. All the pain of doing TLSA and none of the gain, just > > > sec

Re: PATCH: Glibc-2.31 DNSSEC and GCC 10

2020-04-18 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:04:58PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > It's not security theater because nobody's claiming it's secure. > Rather it's a fairly weak form of hardening that increases the > required capabilities an attacker needs to exploit a known-insecure > system. FWIW, Postfix in fact de

Re: PATCH: Glibc-2.31 DNSSEC and GCC 10

2020-04-18 Thread Rich Felker
On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 03:01:08PM -0400, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 01:04:58PM -0400, Rich Felker wrote: > > > > You can consider libc-musl as unsupported from now on. > > > > I am really not appreciating the hostility and utterly petty > > vindictiveness of folks from this