Hello all members of this list,
I have a kind request to all of you related to deliverability of my
messages. Please help.
Currently I have an issue (again; the previous one from a few months ago was
resolved) with my messages sent to Gmail users - they are put into
recipients' Spam folders. I ma
On 2020-03-20 14:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Thank you in advance!
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
localhost.junc.eu
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1, required=5.0, Autolearn=no
autolearn_force=no,
LastExt=2604:8d00:0:1::4
X-Spam-Rules_score: DCC_CHECK=1.9,DKIM_I
On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:16, Philip Paeps wrote:
> On 2020-03-18 09:51:45 (+0800), Wesley Peng wrote:
>> Following this guide:
>> https://useplaintext.email/
>>
>> Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
>
> You should use what the content of the message needs modulo your rec
Benny Pedersen:
> On 2020-03-20 14:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
>
> > Thank you in advance!
>
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on
> localhost.junc.eu
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.1, required=5.0, Autolearn=no
> autolearn_force=no,
> LastExt=2604:8d00:0:1::4
> X-Spam-R
Hi
Sorry for to trivial e-mail and stupid question.I have a dedicated
bare-metal server. I need some tunig postfix to faster delivery (every
time i look in qshappe -it's good)
Amvis and dovecot is in the external server to.
virtual_transport = lmtp:inet:10.0.100.5:24
now i change:
lmtp_destinati
On 20 Mar 2020, at 07:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Currently I have an issue (again; the previous one from a few months ago was
> resolved) with my messages sent to Gmail users - they are put into
> recipients' Spam folders. I managed to actually reach someone at Google,
> who told me that this is d
natan maciej milaszewski:
> Hi
> Sorry for to trivial e-mail and stupid question.I have a dedicated
> bare-metal server. I need some tunig postfix to faster delivery (every
> time i look in qshappe -it's good)
> Amvis and dovecot is in the external server to.
>
>
> virtual_transport = lmtp:inet:1
Jaroslaw Rafa:
> Hello all members of this list,
>
> I have a kind request to all of you related to deliverability of my
> messages. Please help.
>
> Currently I have an issue (again; the previous one from a few months ago was
> resolved) with my messages sent to Gmail users - they are put into
>
Jaroslaw Rafa:
> It looks like the only way to get me out of this condition is that all of
> you who have a Gmail address look in their Spam folder for my messages, and
> click "This is not spam" if you find any, to train the Google's AI that my
> messages are not spam. That's what I'm asking you.
Hi
Thanx Wietse :) i realy read logs and tested via smtp-source (as You
advised)
1)smtp-source -c -m 1000 -s 1 -C 1 -f a...@domain.ltd -t a...@domain.lt
inet:127.0.0.1:25
Mar 20 16:29:07 mta-mx postfix/smtp[29226]: 48kSNL0YT4z20nvD:
to=, relay=127.0.0.1[127.0.0.1]:10628, conn_use=17,
delay=33, de
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 08:12:10 @lbutlr pisze:
> On 20 Mar 2020, at 07:34, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> > Currently I have an issue (again; the previous one from a few months ago was
> > resolved) with my messages sent to Gmail users - they are put into
> > recipients' Spam folders. I managed to actual
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 08:02:19 -0600, @lbutlr stated:
>On 19 Mar 2020, at 00:16, Philip Paeps wrote:
>> On 2020-03-18 09:51:45 (+0800), Wesley Peng wrote:
>>> Following this guide:
>>> https://useplaintext.email/
>>>
>>> Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
>>
>> You
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 11:06:20 Wietse Venema pisze:
> Would it help if the postfix list used "dmarc mitigation" so that
> the From header does not contain your email address:
>
> From: Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-Users
> Reply-To: Jaroslaw Rafa
That probably could help, because Google won't see
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 11:48:59 Gerard E. Seibert pisze:
>
> When I receive an email, I have two immediate choices to make; either
> read it or don't read it.
Let's say I decide to read it, so I press ENTER on the message header.
If it's plaintext, I continue straight on to reading it.
If it's H
On 3/20/20 11:48 AM, Gerard E. Seibert wrote:
>
> Honestly, I fail to see why receivers of HTML based emails seem to
> feel they have a right to get themselves into a hissy fit and dictate
> what type or form of email is permissible? Who made them GODS?
>
> When I receive an email, I have two imme
natan maciej milaszewski:
> Hi
> Thanx Wietse :) i realy read logs and tested via smtp-source (as You
> advised)
>
>
> 1)smtp-source -c -m 1000 -s 1 -C 1 -f a...@domain.ltd -t a...@domain.lt
> inet:127.0.0.1:25
How realistic is it to flood your system with 1000 messages? Fortunately
they were se
On 2020-03-20 16:52, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 11:06:20 Wietse Venema pisze:
Would it help if the postfix list used "dmarc mitigation" so that
the From header does not contain your email address:
From: Jaroslaw Rafa via Postfix-Users
Reply-To: Jaroslaw Rafa
That probably
Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 17:25:35 Benny Pedersen pisze:
>
> if you belive dkim is the problem at google one can disable dkim
> signer and restest that mails is not going to spam folder at google
In my case, DKIM is not the problem.
The problem - for Google - is that the message is from me as the s
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 16:29, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 17:25:35 Benny Pedersen pisze:
> >
> > if you belive dkim is the problem at google one can disable dkim
> > signer and restest that mails is not going to spam folder at google
>
> In my case, DKIM is not the problem.
> T
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 17:07:00 +0100, Jaroslaw Rafa stated:
>Dnia 20.03.2020 o godz. 11:48:59 Gerard E. Seibert pisze:
>>
>> When I receive an email, I have two immediate choices to make; either
>> read it or don't read it.
>
>Let's say I decide to read it, so I press ENTER on the message header.
I prefer text/plain myself, it gets rid of all the annoying marketing
images and silly fonts people like to use. It also proves a point that
modern day marketing of nice long mail signatures with company branding
on them can be pointless when milters and antispam services remove most
of them an
Resending Jaroslaw Rafa's message, so that people who don't see his
email can see it here.
Apparently, Gmail considers Jaroslaw;s email address as a source
of spam, because his postfix-users messages are sent to many people
in a relatively short time.
So if you could look in your spam folder and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 3/20/20 3:29 PM, Ben Lavender wrote:
> I prefer text/plain myself, it gets rid of all the annoying
> marketing images and silly fonts people like to use. It also proves
> a point that modern day marketing of nice long mail signatures with
> compan
Oh Lord.
> Resending Jaroslaw Rafa's message, so that people who don't see his
> email can see it here.
>
> Apparently, Gmail considers Jaroslaw;s email address as a source
> of spam, because his postfix-users messages are sent to many people
> in a relatively short time.
>
> So if you could loo
Thanks for the response, and sorry for my delayed reaction.
I understand that always_bcc should send a copy to the address indicated or the
alias of the address indicated. My situation is slightly different. It’s the
initial recipient (the To:) that is aliased AND uses a transport to execute
Prince Law Offices:
> Thanks for the response, and sorry for my delayed reaction.
>
> I understand that always_bcc should send a copy to the address
> indicated or the alias of the address indicated. My situation is
> slightly different. It?s the initial recipient (the To:) that is
> aliased A
26 matches
Mail list logo
