Hello everybody, I am using a Postfix mail relay to modify sender
addresses of emails coming from my company Office 365 cloud-hosted
domain: I configured a connector on Office 365 to route all emails to
Postfix.
Everything works perfectly, except for some recipient domains that are
also hosted on o
Dnia 18.03.2020 o godz. 02:51:45 Wesley Peng pisze:
>
> Following this guide:
> https://useplaintext.email/
>
> Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
Absolutely. Email basically is, was and should remain plaintext.
Use HTML only when it's absolutely necessary. By "neces
Agree!
On 18/3/20 9:51 am, Wesley Peng wrote:
Hello
Following this guide:
https://useplaintext.email/
Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
Thanks
> On Mar 18, 2020, at 11:45 AM, ego...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> host xxx-xxx.mail.protection.outlook.com[X.X.X.X] said: 554 5.4.14 Hop
> count exceeded - possible mail loop ATTR1
> [xxx-xxx.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to end of DATA
> command)
>
I suspect this is based on received heade
On 18/03/2020 02:40, Anton Rieger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 02:51:45AM +0100, Wesley Peng wrote:
>> Hello
> Hello
>
>>
>> Following this guide:
>> https://useplaintext.email/
> I don't like it's tone but it's mostly ok
>
>>
>> Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
>
On 2020-03-18 11:27, Darac Marjal wrote:
> There is clearly a desire among users for something more than plain
> text. You often want *emphasis* in flame wars. You want a table in
> reporting your financial results or when listing various things.
> However, I think everyone can agree that "Responsi
Dnia 18.03.2020 o godz. 15:27:24 Darac Marjal pisze:
>
> I'd argue then, that a middle ground is the way forward. Emails should
> be written in a markup language which is both relatively simple (yet
> flexible enough to handle the basic formatting commands) and human
> readable before (and after)
Dusan Obradovic:
>
> > On Mar 18, 2020, at 11:45 AM, ego...@gmail.com wrote:
> >
> > host xxx-xxx.mail.protection.outlook.com[X.X.X.X] said: 554 5.4.14 Hop
> > count exceeded - possible mail loop ATTR1
> > [xxx-xxx.prod.protection.outlook.com] (in reply to end of DATA
> > command)
> >
>
> I sus
Dnia 18.03.2020 o godz. 16:52:10 m...@junc.eu pisze:
> On 2020-03-18 03:40, Anton Rieger wrote:
>
> >Do xyz like you see in image1.png.
> >Lorem Ipsum look at image2.png.
>
> images is not html
>
> and OP asked to do plain text, not remove inline images attachments
inline images != image at
On 2020-03-18 02:51, Wesley Peng wrote:
Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
to make the postfix digest maillist look better yes :=)
On 2020-03-18 03:40, Anton Rieger wrote:
Do xyz like you see in image1.png.
Lorem Ipsum look at image2.png.
images is not html
and OP asked to do plain text, not remove inline images attachments
/me hiddes before the fire starts burning now
I think this train has left the station almost 30 years ago. The
only people who care about plaintext are people who were born before
circa 1980, or who are part of some extremist minority.
Wietse.
Thanks Dusan and Wietse, I searched in postfix log files and I can
confirm that looping emails have the same ID. "Normal" emails ID
appear in the log files a few times (depending on the number of
recipients I suppose), but looping emails appear many times:
14 times
db8p195mb0565dd65da92d1861c8946
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020, at 11:27, Darac Marjal wrote:
> Markdown is a very good step
> towards this, IMO.
Oh the irony...
>From the initial announcement of Markdown by John Gruber
>(https://web.archive.org/web/20040402182332/http://daringfireball.net/projects/markdown/):
" the single biggest sou
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 03:27:24PM +, Darac Marjal wrote:
On 18/03/2020 02:40, Anton Rieger wrote:
On Wed, Mar 18, 2020 at 02:51:45AM +0100, Wesley Peng wrote:
Hello
Hello
Following this guide:
https://useplaintext.email/
I don't like it's tone but it's mostly ok
Shall we use plaint
On 2020-03-18 09:08, Wietse Venema wrote:
> I think this train has left the station almost 30 years ago. The
> only people who care about plaintext are people who were born before
> circa 1980,
> or who are part of some extremist minority.
Which includes anyone who even _knows_ what comprises t
ego...@gmail.com:
> Thanks Dusan and Wietse, I searched in postfix log files and I can
> confirm that looping emails have the same ID. "Normal" emails ID
> appear in the log files a few times (depending on the number of
> recipients I suppose), but looping emails appear many times:
>
> 14 times
>
Has anyone considered the absolute want of utility that image data presents for
the blind?
The advantage of plain text is that there are any number of automated assists
that can process it into audio.
--
*** e-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel ***
Do NOT transmit sensitive d
On 2020-03-18 09:51:45 (+0800), Wesley Peng wrote:
Following this guide:
https://useplaintext.email/
Shall we use plaintext message in regular email communication?
You should use what the content of the message needs modulo your
recipients' wishes.
I personally prefer to receive plain text
19 matches
Mail list logo
