Hello All
I installed Postfix 3.4.9 with SHLIB support in /usr/local/postfix.
In main.cf I set: shlib_directory = /usr/local/postfix/lib
On make install: I get the following error:
postfix/postfix-script[40500]: fatal: no Postfix shared-library directory
/usr/local/postfix/lib!
Can I not inst
Hi,
I tried to adopt smtp dsn like dokumented here:
http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_delivery_status_filter
Since the example is exactly what I want (so my users get Non delivery
notifications for domains where we refuse to send without transport
encryption but won't offer it earlie
Hi
Sorry about my probably stupid and easy question.
I have one server for outgoing smtp and I added a spamassassin to
filtered outgoing e-mial
This is trivial like
cut master.cf:
start -
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd -o
content_filter=spamassassin
submission
Dnia 5.03.2020 o godz. 12:06:43 natan maciej milaszewski pisze:
>
> I use DKIM (added like documentations)
>
> In log i found double added DKIM - because the mail goes back to the
> queue and smtpd_milters tags it again ...
>
> Probably I must create a returns transport with "-o smtpd_milters="
Hi
Thenx for replay :) You have right
I forget add a "-o smtpd_milters" in smtp
smtp inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=spamassassin
-o smtpd_milters=
But Your solution is better
On 05.03.2020 12:19, Jaroslaw Rafa wrote:
> Dnia 5.03.2020 o godz. 12:06:43 natan maciej
Rainer Ruprechtsberger:
> Hi,
>
> I tried to adopt smtp dsn like dokumented here:
> http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#default_delivery_status_filter
>
> Since the example is exactly what I want (so my users get Non delivery
> notifications for domains where we refuse to send without transpor
zahn:
> I do not want: /usr/lib/postfix! for the SHLIBS - it MUST be in the
> Installation Directory: /usr/local/postfix
Then you need to specify that at BUILD time not INSTALL time.
See section 4.3.3 in the INSTALL file.
Begin quote
To override the default location of Postfix dynamically-linked
Wietse Venema:
> zahn:
> > I do not want: /usr/lib/postfix! for the SHLIBS - it MUST be in the
> > Installation Directory: /usr/local/postfix
>
> Then you need to specify that at BUILD time not INSTALL time.
> See section 4.3.3 in the INSTALL file.
>
> Begin quote
> To override the default locat
Hello,
I have a mail server with one domain and two servers i use to send email
transactional.
My question is, it's possible configure the parameter
sender_dependent_relayhost_maps with round robin?
sender_dependent_default_transport_maps =
hash:/etc/postfix/sender_dependant_default_transport.ma
Emanuel Gonzalez:
> Hello,
>
> I have a mail server with one domain and two servers i use to send email
> transactional.
>
> My question is, it's possible configure the parameter
> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps with round robin?
Generally, Postfix does not support nested tables, so it cannot
d
Hello!
Don't know why TLSv1 is still offered on our servers running
mail_version = 2.11.3
smtpd_tls_protocols = !SSLv2, !SSLv3, !TLSv1
but a scan by ssllabs.com or with testssl.sh shows TLSv1 is still supported.
I am not sure what's wrong. What do I miss?
Other parameters I set:
smtpd_tls_CApa
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:08:43PM +0100, ratatouille wrote:
> Don't know why TLSv1 is still offered on our servers running
Probably because you're not changing the configuration in the right
place. Double-check that you're configuring the correct Postfix
instance (if using multiple instances) a
Hello,
I tried disabling TLSv1.0 and TLSv1.1 on our Postfix mailservers at the
beginning of the year (since there were advisories that anything older
than 1.2 is considered weak and broken), and it did not end well, there
were numerous complaints from what turned out to be still supported LTS
Viktor Dukhovni schrieb am 05.03.20 um 16:44:14
Uhr:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:08:43PM +0100, ratatouille wrote:
>
> > Don't know why TLSv1 is still offered on our servers running
>
> Probably because you're not changing the configuration in the right
> place. Double-check that you're co
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 12:26:06AM +0100, ratatouille wrote:
> I have just too TLSv1 connections this month:
> ...
> 11 TLSv1.2 with cipher AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)
> 9 TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)
> 9 TLSv1.2 with cipher CAMELLIA128-SHA (128/128 bits)
> 9 TLSv1
> On 5 March 2020, at 15:26, ratatouille wrote:
>
> Viktor Dukhovni schrieb am 05.03.20 um 16:44:14
> Uhr:
>
>> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 09:08:43PM +0100, ratatouille wrote:
>>
>>> Don't know why TLSv1 is still offered on our servers running
>>
>> Probably because you're not changing the
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:57:59PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
> Small mail server with 3 weeks of logs:
>
>1761 TLSv1
> 18 TLSv1.1
> 20414 TLSv1.2
>6343 TLSv1.3
>
> That's not what I expected. I thought v1 and v1.1 would be reversed.
> There is a complete spectrum of ciphers being
Virtually all my TLSv1 connections come from this mailing list...
Would there be any mileage in disabling OUTBOUND TLSv1 connections while
accepting inbound for a little while longer?
Allen C
On 05/03/2020 20:08, ratatouille wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Don't know why TLSv1 is still offered on our serve
On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 02:16:42AM +, Allen Coates wrote:
> Virtually all my TLSv1 connections come from this mailing list...
>
> Would there be any mileage in disabling OUTBOUND TLSv1 connections while
> accepting inbound for a little while longer?
You can certainly configure each direction
> On 5 March 2020, at 17:15, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:57:59PM -0800, Doug Hardie wrote:
>
>> Small mail server with 3 weeks of logs:
>>
>> 1761 TLSv1
>> 18 TLSv1.1
>> 20414 TLSv1.2
>> 6343 TLSv1.3
>>
>> That's not what I expected. I thought v1 and v1.1 wo
20 matches
Mail list logo
