Hello all,
A shared hosting web server of a customer (running a Postfix with local
e-mail addresses and mailboxes) was blacklisted on backscatterer. The
relevant information from the backscatterer page pointed me to a moment in
time and I was able to check the logs from that given moment (+- 2mins
On Jun 27, 2019, at 12:38 AM, post...@aptget.dk wrote:
Wed, 26 Jun 2019 20:23:44 -0600 skrev "@lbutlr" :
The spamass-milter is not rejecting mail that scores above the number set in
the -r flag for the milter (confirmed by other people this is a bug in
spamass-milter).
Is there something I can
On 28.06.19 10:10, Claudio Kuenzler wrote:
A shared hosting web server of a customer (running a Postfix with local
e-mail addresses and mailboxes) was blacklisted on backscatterer. The
relevant information from the backscatterer page pointed me to a moment in
time and I was able to check the logs
Greetings, Ronald F. Guilmette!
> Apparently, and much to my surprise, there is more than one mbox format.
> I just now stumbled across this, because I am going to be (re-)writing
> some small tools I have that do useful things with mail messages stored
> in "mbox format":
> https://en.wikip
On Jun 28, 2019, at 2:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 27.06.19 11:57, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Possibly it is an 11.2 issue then.
>
> check sa-milter RC script. doesn't it redefine reject score on commandline
> somewhere?
It does, it just doesn’t actually reject the mail. In facts, in behave
On Jun 28, 2019, at 5:28 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Guess why I'm using Maildir?
Because mbox was designed for a tens of Kilobytes of email?
--
What's another word for Thesaurus?
On Jun 28, 2019, at 2:22 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On 27.06.19 11:57, @lbutlr wrote:
Possibly it is an 11.2 issue then.
check sa-milter RC script. doesn't it redefine reject score on commandline
somewhere?
It does, it just doesn’t actually reject the mail. In facts, in behaves exac
Greetings, @lbutlr!
>> Guess why I'm using Maildir?
> Because mbox was designed for a tens of Kilobytes of email?
I have doubts it was at all designed. More like thrown together for the sake
of plugging the hole of mail storage.
On a sidenote, I've seen a variation of mbox format that uses an F
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:26:20AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> >My question now is: What is the correct/expected behaviour in such a
> >situation?
>
> You apparently should use SRS when forwarding mail. That will change sender
> to your domain so the mail will pass SPF and should not b
Andrey Repin:
> Greetings, @lbutlr!
>
> >> Guess why I'm using Maildir?
>
> > Because mbox was designed for a tens of Kilobytes of email?
>
> I have doubts it was at all designed. More like thrown together for the sake
> of plugging the hole of mail storage.
Allow me to set the record straight.
On Fri, 28 Jun 2019 at 14:48, Viktor Dukhovni
wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:26:20AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>
> > >My question now is: What is the correct/expected behaviour in such a
> > >situation?
> >
> > You apparently should use SRS when forwarding mail. That will change
>
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 03:11:03PM +0100, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> > SRS is enough to avoid trouble with SPF, but not enough to avoid
> > trouble with DMARC. Email forwarding has been irreparably broken
> > by DMARC.
>
> Where the original rejected-by-Gmail email appears good my approach
> (autom
>My question now is: What is the correct/expected behaviour in such a
>situation?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:26:20AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
You apparently should use SRS when forwarding mail. That will change sender
to your domain so the mail will pass SPF and should not be refus
On 28 Jun 2019, at 10:25, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
>My question now is: What is the correct/expected behaviour in such
a
>situation?
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:26:20AM +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas
wrote:
You apparently should use SRS when forwarding mail. That will change
sender
to yo
On Jun 28, 2019, at 6:42 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> On 28.06.19 06:01, @lbutlr wrote:
>> root 23945 0.0 0.3 31560 10908 - Ss Sun14 0:14.52
>> /usr/local/sbin/spamass-milter -f -p /var/run/spamass-milter.sock -u spamd
>> -e -i 65.121.55.40/29 -i 127.0.0.1 -r 10
>
> do
On Jun 28, 2019, at 6:39 AM, Andrey Repin wrote:
> Greetings, @lbutlr!
>
>>> Guess why I'm using Maildir?
>
>> Because mbox was designed for a tens of Kilobytes of email?
>
> I have doubts it was at all designed. More like thrown together for the sake
> of plugging the hole of mail storage.
T
16 matches
Mail list logo
