I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat busy
this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation rather than
sit on it for a week until I could research it.
I attempted to remove the distro specific noise from the report.
Scott K
Package: postfix
Scott Kitterman:
> I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat busy
> this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation rather than
> sit on it for a week until I could research it.
>
> I attempted to remove the distro specific noise from the report.
S
On Sunday, March 10, 2019 11:11:15 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Scott Kitterman:
> > I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat
> > busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation
> > rather than sit on it for a week until I could research it.
> >
>
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:11:15 -0400 (EDT), Wietse Venema stated:
>Scott Kitterman:
>> I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm
>> somewhat busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without
>> evaluation rather than sit on it for a week until I could research
>> it.
>>
To add a possible data point to the convo,
at least one distro, OpenSUSE, is already toying with apparently poorly
thought-thru patches (aka, not vetted/source here, from upstream) --
e,g, here,
https://build.opensuse.org/package/view_file/openSUSE:Factory/postfix/postfix-linux45.patch?expand=
On Sun, 10 Mar 2019 11:41:01 -0400, Scott Kitterman stated:
>On Sunday, March 10, 2019 11:11:15 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
>> Scott Kitterman:
>> > I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm
>> > somewhat busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it
>> > without evaluation
Scott Kitterman:
> On Sunday, March 10, 2019 11:11:15 AM Wietse Venema wrote:
> > Scott Kitterman:
> > > I received the bug report/patch below from a Debian user. I'm somewhat
> > > busy this weekend/week, so I decided to forward it without evaluation
> > > rather than sit on it for a week until I
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 02:34:02PM +, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> This worked just fine until 3.3.2-4 inclusive but since I've upgraded
> my sid system yesterday and Postfix was upgraded to 3.4.1-1 I see:
>
> postfix/smtp[15202]: warning: Trust anchor files not supported
> postfix/smtp[15202
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29:44PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the bug
> > fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
> > 3.4
> > please do it before next Sunday so I can keep it out of the ne
Viktor Dukhovni:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:29:44PM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> > > My preference would be to press on with 3.4 (I don't mind packaging the
> > > bug
> > > fixes if you don't mind releasing them), but if you are going to withdraw
> > > 3.4
> > > please do it before next S
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.4.2.html]
Postfix stable release 3.4.2 is available.
* DANE trust anchor file support was broken after the Postfix 3.4
TLS library overhaul. Fix by Scott Kitterman.
* LINUX5 is su
On 10/03/2019 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
> You are looking from the "we made improvements" angle. I am looking
> from the "with hard work, we introduce 1 bug in 1000 lines of new
> code" angle.
>
> In the TLS library there were 1039 additions and 559 deletions from
> Postfix 3.3.3 to 3.4.1 (diff
when will this version be published? on the web is not yet the source or
the change list
*
Este mensaje y todos los archivos adjuntos son confidenciales y de uso
exclusivo por parte
de su/sus destina
Daniele Nicolodi:
> On 10/03/2019 15:07, Wietse Venema wrote:
> > You are looking from the "we made improvements" angle. I am looking
> > from the "with hard work, we introduce 1 bug in 1000 lines of new
> > code" angle.
> >
> > In the TLS library there were 1039 additions and 559 deletions from
>
Francesc Pe?alvez:
> when will this version be published? on the web is not yet the source or
> the change list
It is released on www.porcupine.org. If you get it from a
Postfix mirror, then you will have to wait up to 24 hours.
Wietse
there is an error in that web if i choose the link of wietse own site
the link download is this
ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
*
Este mensaje y todos los archivos adjuntos
Is there a simple way to make a deb package from source or do an update
from a deb package?
*
Este mensaje y todos los archivos adjuntos son confidenciales y de uso
exclusivo por parte
de su/sus dest
Francesc Pe?alvez:
> Is there a simple way to make a deb package from source or do an update
> from a deb package?
Postfix is platform neutral, so I don't do deb, rpm, pkg, or
other package managers. That is the job for distibutions.
Wietse
Francesc Pe?alvez:
> there is an error in that web if i choose the link of wietse own site
> the link download is this
> ftp://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Using Chrome? use http://ftp.porcupine.org/mirrors/postfix-release/index.html
Wietse
Please stop sending this nonsense to the list.
> On 10 Mar 2019, at 17:21, Francesc Peñalvez wrote:
>
> *
> Este mensaje y todos los archivos adjuntos son confidenciales y de uso
> exclusivo por part
On 3/10/19 3:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>* LINUX5 is supported, based on sanity checks with a Rawhide
> prerelease.
fyi, still
cd postfix-3.4.2
make tidy
make -f Makefile.in MAKELEVEL= Makefiles
(echo "# Do not edit -- this file d
sure i use it thanks!!
the question of whether there is a simple way to make a deb package, is
that I have a somewhat complicated configuration and I would not like to
lose it or run two postfix one in the local directory and the deb
package in normal sbin, so I asked if there is some simple w
PGNet Dev:
> On 3/10/19 3:19 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >* LINUX5 is supported, based on sanity checks with a Rawhide
> > prerelease.
>
> fyi, still
Sorry, I forgot to update the makedefs script.
Wietse
Sorry its my firm,i erease when send mail to this list
smime.p7s
Description: Firma criptográfica S/MIME
[An on-line version of this announcement will be available at
http://www.postfix.org/announcements/postfix-3.4.3.html]
Postfix stable release 3.4.3 is available.
One of the Postfix 3.4.2 changes (LINUX5) was missing. For your
convenience, the remainder of this text repeats the content of the
Post
Francesc Peñalvez skrev den 2019-03-11 00:44:
Sorry its my firm,i erease when send mail to this list
and there is freemail where forced signatures is not done
> On Jan 8, 2019, at 5:17 PM, Bastian Schmidt <[hidden email]> wrote:
>
> I have an email client (K-9 on Android), which, when using TLS client
> certificates insists on sending an auth external. However, postfix/SASL
> does not advertise external auth, which causes the client to not being
> able
27 matches
Mail list logo
