Hello, it is possible to accept emails with 5xx status code?
Why such behavior? I want to return 5xx status codes when email is
reject (to prevent sending bounces), but I would like to store copy of
rejected emails in case some inspection would be needed in future.
Storing copy of those emails int
Hi,
how can the following error be detected and an instant bounce/reject will
be send to the sender?
-- 880 Kbytes in 3 Requests.
root@mx1:~# mailq
-Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
A97288008B 776694 Sun Jan 13 13:14:29 sender@sender
Mayuresh:
> Sure. Basically I see only one hash in your snippet - that of the
> protected destinations. I did not notice a hash of senders allowed to send
> to the protected destinations. Am I missing something?
Original example:
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
Stefan Bauer:
> Hi,
>
> how can the following error be detected and an instant bounce/reject will
> be send to the sender?
>
> -- 880 Kbytes in 3 Requests.
> root@mx1:~# mailq
> -Queue ID- --Size-- Arrival Time -Sender/Recipient---
> A97288008B 776694 Sun Jan 13 13:14:29 sender@se
Pali Roh?r:
> Hello, it is possible to accept emails with 5xx status code?
By replying with 5XX after SMTP end-of-data.
Wietse
> Why such behavior? I want to return 5xx status codes when email is
> reject (to prevent sending bounces), but I would like to store copy of
> rejected emails i
reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
Damn! It was working as documented. Sorry.
Am Mi., 16. Jan. 2019 um 13:17 Uhr schrieb Wietse Venema <
wie...@porcupine.org>:
> Stefan Bauer:
> > Hi,
> >
> > h
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:14:37AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> All I suggested was to split smtpd_recipient_restrictions
> and use smtpd_relay_restrictions for the spam blocks.
>
> That was, TO SPLIT smtpd_recipient_restrictions, NOT TO REMOVE
> the hash maps.
Ok, thanks.
Mayuresh
Stefan Bauer:
> reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
> probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
reject_unverified RECIPIENT, not reject_unverified_SENDER
Wietse
> Damn! It was working as documented. Sorry.
>
>
> Am Mi., 16. Jan
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 9:56 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> reject_unverified_recipient is no option as remote sites don't like
>> probing/verify requests. After rechecking, i had a typo in my regex.
>
> reject_unverified RECIPIENT, not reject_unverified_SENDER
Specifically, because it would be us
On 16 Jan 2019, at 4:15, Pali Rohár wrote:
Hello, it is possible to accept emails with 5xx status code?
Why such behavior? I want to return 5xx status codes when email is
reject (to prevent sending bounces), but I would like to store copy of
rejected emails in case some inspection would be need
"Some sites may blacklist you when you are probing them too often (a probe
is an SMTP session that does not deliver mail), or when you are probing
them too often for a non-existent address. This is one reason why you
should use sender address verification sparingly, if at all, when your site
receiv
> On Jan 16, 2019, at 3:24 PM, Stefan Bauer wrote:
>
> "Some sites may blacklist you when you are probing them too often (a probe is
> an SMTP session that does not deliver mail), or when you are probing them too
> often for a non-existent address. This is one reason why you should use
> sende
Hi,
I have a blackbox UPS that send this email when I look at it with postcat
*** MESSAGE CONTENTS deferred/B/BFE60169 ***
regular_text: Received: from loki.nsd.org (ups-tms.nsd.org [10.145.1.25])
regular_text: by sys.nsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE60169
regular_text: for ; Wed, 16 Jan 20
Ski Kacoroski:
> Hi,
>
> I have a blackbox UPS that send this email when I look at it with postcat
>
> *** MESSAGE CONTENTS deferred/B/BFE60169 ***
> regular_text: Received: from loki.nsd.org (ups-tms.nsd.org [10.145.1.25])
> regular_text: by sys.nsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE60169
>
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 07:14:37AM -0500, Wietse Venema wrote:
> insiders_only = check_sender_access hash:/etc/postfix/insiders, reject
On above line if I replace reject with reject_unauth_destination it
becomes permissive rather than rejecting.
What is the exact difference between reject
15 matches
Mail list logo
