Re: what does these log lines mean?

Thank you for answer. I attach .txt file with output of postconf -n. 2018-11-06 8:05 GMT+01:00 B. Reino : > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > > Sorry for http markup, I got knowledge for the future. Thank you for brief >> answer. Does each email is filtered by amavisd or only some kin

Re: what does these log lines mean?

On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, Poliman - Serwis wrote: Thank you for answer. I attach .txt file with output of postconf -n. Your original message showed amavis filtering on ports 10024 and 10026. Your postfix configuration shows only amavis on port 10024. I think your logs don't come from the postfix wi

Re: what does these log lines mean?

Both are from one server. I am not cheating. Now I am confused, it's really strange that these logs are diff. Your earlier message was enough for me. 2018-11-06 12:48 GMT+01:00 B. Reino : > On Tue, 6 Nov 2018, Poliman - Serwis wrote: > > Thank you for answer. I attach .txt file with output of pos

Re: postfix relay aunthentication error

Its sorted, i needed to allow the postfix server as a relay in Exchange 2016 -- Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html

Strange issue

Mail service is working except for delivery to a single host, which is reporting a strange error: postfix/smtp[13722]: 629D7A7DF9: to=, relay=none, delay=1099, delays=1097/0/1.5/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for name=mx4.kpbsd.k12.ak.us type=A: Ho

Re: Strange issue

Simba: > Mail service is working except for delivery to a single host, which is > reporting a strange error: > > postfix/smtp[13722]: 629D7A7DF9: to=, > relay=none, delay=1099, delays=1097/0/1.5/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred > (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=mx4.kpbsd

RE: Strange issue

I didn't see the errors Wietse did, but when I ran your domain through the report at www.dnsstuff.com it noted this (among a few other minor things): transitioning domain of kpbsd.k12.ak.us does not designate 74.123.240.23 as permitted sender | softfail | 74.123.240.23 Need to update your SPF

Re: Strange issue

Wietse Venema: > Simba: > > Mail service is working except for delivery to a single host, which is > > reporting a strange error: > > > > postfix/smtp[13722]: 629D7A7DF9: to=, > > relay=none, delay=1099, delays=1097/0/1.5/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred > > (Host or domain name not found. Name servi

RE: Strange issue

Doing a couple of quick "digs" on the MX records, I noticed that in the "ADDITIONAL SECTION" that the ACS servers report more hosts than the kpbsd.k12.ak.us entry. Do you have access to that DNS server? I suspect the SOA may be a bit off from the others. I presume that one of the three is you

Re: Strange issue

> On Nov 6, 2018, at 10:37 AM, Simba wrote: > > postfix/smtp[13722]: 629D7A7DF9: to=, > relay=none, delay=1099, delays=1097/0/1.5/0, dsn=4.4.3, status=deferred > (Host or domain name not found. Name service error for > name=mx4.kpbsd.k12.ak.us type=A: Host not found, try again) There is no evi

Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

Hi Wietse, Op 06/11/2018 om 00:36 schreef Wietse Venema: Stephan Bosch: Hi, Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and recipient addresses passed to a policy delegation service (in this case Dovecot quo

Re: sender_dependent_relayhost_maps with different credentials for same relayhost

Thank you! Am Montag, 5. November 2018 schrieb Wietse Venema : > Stefan Bauer: >> Hi, >> >> i have: >> sender_dependent_relayhost_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/relayhost_maps >> smtp_sasl_password_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/smtp_auth >> >> more /etc/postfix/relayhost_maps >> @mydomain.de[smtp.1und1.d

Re: RFC 5321 address quoting for policy delegation protocol

Stephan Bosch: > Hi Wietse, > > > Op 06/11/2018 om 00:36 schreef Wietse Venema: > > Stephan Bosch: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there a reason why Postfix omits quoting the localpart (when that > >> would normally be necessary according to RFC 5321) of sender and > >> recipient addresses passed to a pol