Laura Smith wrote:
Honestly, you are most likely wasting your time on that point because all that you are
likely to get back is a page of waffle saying "blah blah blah ... security
reasons... blah blah blah"
I know this because a sysadmin ex-colleague was having problems creating accounts with
CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)
mail_version = 2.10.1
Several years funning one content filter:
127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
-o content_filter=filter:dummy
...
Now, we need an autoresponder for one incoming address. Trying to use this:
https://www.howtofor
> I don't see readon to reboot servers periodically.
I have 2 reasons, neither having anything to do with postfix:
1) If you are using a filesystem type that wants to be checked every 180+
days, you will want to do a controlled reboot when YOU want your server
offline for a while, not when Thor,
Mike Schleif:
> CentOS Linux release 7.5.1804 (Core)
> mail_version = 2.10.1
>
> Several years funning one content filter:
> 127.0.0.1:10025 inet n - n - - smtpd
> -o content_filter=filter:dummy
> ...
>
> Now, we need an autoresponder for one incoming address. Trying t
content_filter=filter:dummy
This filter has been running for years, massaging all messages as we
require, and must continue to run on all messages. Microsoft Exchange users
require this, and must receive all messages.
content_filter=autoresponder
One virtual email address must generate an autoresp
Mike Schleif:
> content_filter=filter:dummy
> This filter has been running for years, massaging all messages as we
> require, and must continue to run on all messages. Microsoft Exchange users
> require this, and must receive all messages.
All addresses INCLUDING the special address?
> content_fi
All addresses INCLUDING the special address? - yes
The special address is subject to ONLY this filter or BOTH filters? - BOTH
filters
Perhaps, there is another solution? All I'm trying to add is an
out-of-office message to one incoming address. However, this OOO message
must run 5pm-8am weekday
Mike Schleif:
> All addresses INCLUDING the special address? - yes
>
> The special address is subject to ONLY this filter or BOTH filters? - BOTH
> filters
>
> Perhaps, there is another solution? All I'm trying to add is an
> out-of-office message to one incoming address. However, this OOO mess
No parallel content_filter processing?
http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
Advanced content filter: sending unfiltered mail to the content filter
RE: "scan"
This runs up to 10 content filters in parallel.
What am I missing?
~ Mike
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 1:47 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 3:09 PM Wietse Venema wrote:
> Mike Schleif:
> > All addresses INCLUDING the special address? - yes
> >
> > The special address is subject to ONLY this filter or BOTH filters? -
> BOTH
> > filters
> >
> > Perhaps, there is another solution? All I'm trying to add is an
>
The readme is referring to running 10 instances of the same content
filter in parallel to increase performance.
You appear to be using the "simple" content filter method, where
each filter reinjects mail to postfix by using the sendmail command.
The normal method of chaining multiple filters by cy
On 15 Oct 2018, at 15:51, Mike Schleif wrote:
All addresses INCLUDING the special address? - yes
The special address is subject to ONLY this filter or BOTH filters? -
BOTH
filters
Perhaps, there is another solution? All I'm trying to add is an
out-of-office message to one incoming address.
I agree. I looked at rfc4422. Treating identity in MAIL FROM command as
sasl authenticated will violate rfc itself (no auth mechanisms was
involved).
I won't be able do run smtpd_sender_login_mismatch,
smtpd_sender_login_maps checks.
But rfc4954 section 5 states:
The optional AUTH par
October 15 2018 11:19 AM, "Kris Deugau" wrote:
> Laura Smith wrote:
>
>> Honestly, you are most likely wasting your time on that point because all
>> that you are likely to
>> get back is a page of waffle saying "blah blah blah ... security reasons...
>> blah blah blah"
>>> I know this because
Mike Schleif:
> No parallel content_filter processing?
>
> http://www.postfix.org/FILTER_README.html
>
> Advanced content filter: sending unfiltered mail to the content filter
>
> RE: "scan"
> This runs up to 10 content filters in parallel.
>
> What am I missing?
I need to know how your filter
Mike Schleif:
> Is this what you're looking for?
>
> filterunix - n n - 10 pipe
> flags=Rq user=filter null_sender=
> argv=/var/spool/filter/bin/filter.sh -f ${sender} -- ${recipient}
That is the 'simple' filter, which uses pipes, not SMTP.
> autoresponder u
Vadim S. Ivanov:
> I agree. I looked at rfc4422. Treating identity in MAIL FROM command as
> sasl authenticated will violate rfc itself (no auth mechanisms was
> involved).
> I won't be able do run smtpd_sender_login_mismatch,
> smtpd_sender_login_maps checks.
>
>
> But rfc4954 section 5 state
17 matches
Mail list logo
