RE: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
Hi, I run 2.10.1 I think this should help http://www.postfix.org/VIRTUAL_README.html maybe virtual_alias_domains = test.net test.com not sure what you would need to configure for mynetworks = http://www.postfix.org/postconf.5.html#mynetworks -ANGELO FAZZINA ITS Service Manager: Spam and Vir

Re: error when atempting to send a message

2018-07-25 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 15.07.18 10:21, David Mehler wrote: Thank you and sorry for the long delay in this. Can I get a look at your master.cf submission definition? I'd like to compare it with mine. submission inet n - - - - smtpd -o syslog_name=postfix/submission -o smtpd_tls_secur

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jul 24, 2018, at 1:31 PM, Software Information > wrote: > > I have my postfix server up and running now for some time. Recently though, > auditors made a deal that the server is an open relay. If there are systems on your network that need to use the machine as a smarthost for outbound

Re: Missing 'Received' in header

2018-07-25 Thread durwin
> > > > Thank you. I have this there. > > /^X-SPAM-FLAG:\s+YES/ REDIRECT s...@mycompany.com > > > > How can I keep this without wiping out the original header? > > This does not drop Recived: headers. You are dropping those headers > in some other way. > > Wietse It turns out some email

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread Software Information
Hi. Thanks for replying. Let's say my internal domain is test.com. I can telnet to the server and send an email as u...@example.com out to anyone on the internet. They have a problem with that. So I thought maybe I could fix this by configuring the server to only accept outgoing mail from us...@tes

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Software Information > wrote: > > Hi. Thanks for replying. Let's say my internal domain is test.com. I can > telnet to the server and send an email as u...@example.com out to anyone on > the internet. They have a problem with that. So I thought maybe I could

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread Software Information
Wow. you learn as you go. Thanks very much for the insight. I will experiment to see what works best for us. On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Viktor Dukhovni < postfix-us...@dukhovni.org> wrote: > > > > On Jul 25, 2018, at 11:24 AM, Software Information < > softwareinfor...@gmail.com> wrote: > >

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread @lbutlr
On 24 Jul 2018, at 11:31, Software Information wrote: > Recently though, auditors made a deal that the server is an open relay. Based on the rest of this thread, it sounds very much like the auditors are incompetent. I mean, not knowing what an open relay is is concerning.

Re: Missing 'Received' in header

2018-07-25 Thread durwin
Solved. Turns out I had a rouge agent running only in my Lotus database. It was removing all the Received headers. Thank you. Durwin > From: dur...@mgtsciences.com > To: Postfix users > Cc: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org > Date: 07/25/2018 09:19 AM > Subject: Re: Missing 'Received' in header

Re: Open Relay on local lan

2018-07-25 Thread John Peach
On 07/25/2018 01:36 PM, @lbutlr wrote: On 24 Jul 2018, at 11:31, Software Information wrote: Recently though, auditors made a deal that the server is an open relay. Based on the rest of this thread, it sounds very much like the auditors are incompetent. I mean, not knowing what an open rel

Flags question in master.cf

2018-07-25 Thread Fazzina, Angelo
Hi, i have this in my master file. autoreply unix - n n - - pipe flags=DFuser=nobody argv=/usr/local/bin/angelo $sender $recipient $original_recipient $user $domain everything is working as I want. Is there a flag or macro that can get me t

Re: Flags question in master.cf

2018-07-25 Thread Wietse Venema
Fazzina, Angelo: > Hi, i have this in my master file. > > autoreply unix - n n - - pipe > flags=DFuser=nobody > argv=/usr/local/bin/angelo $sender $recipient $original_recipient > $user $domain > > > everything is working as I want. Is ther