Wietse Venema writes:
>> postfix/smtpd[21083]: warning: unknown macro name "submit_reject_footer" in
>> expansion request
>
> That may be because there was no main.cf setting at the time.
I definitely have it set in main.cf:
submit_reject_footer=\c For further help, contact support.
and it is
I have almost same logs. Some time ago I asked people on this mailing list.
They said that somebody tries to connect to your server but he can't
because of too old ssl he uses. You can ignore it.
2018-04-27 8:22 GMT+02:00 Dominic Raferd :
> I have always received a number of warning messages (fro
micah:
> Wietse Venema writes:
>
> >> postfix/smtpd[21083]: warning: unknown macro name "submit_reject_footer"
> >> in expansion request
> >
> > That may be because there was no main.cf setting at the time.
>
> I definitely have it set in main.cf:
>
> submit_reject_footer=\c For further help,
si5:
> Hi
>
> I posted one query similar to the above but I didn't got any satisfactory
> replies. The link for the query is provided below:-
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/benchmark-for-postfix-td95966.html
>
> We want to find an official document for postfix which will tell the maximum
Here's what I use for Shorewall messages:
/etc/rsyslog.d/00-shorewall.conf:
if $msg contains 'Shorewall' then {
action(type="omfile" file="/var/log/shorewall.log")
# if ($syslogfacility == 0 and $syslogseverity >= 4) then stop # warning
# if ($syslogfacility == 0 and $syslogseverity >= 5) then
Wietse:
>>si5:
> Hi
>
> I posted one query similar to the above but I didn't got any satisfactory
> replies. The link for the query is provided below:-
> http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/benchmark-for-postfix-td95966.html
>
> We want to find an official document for postfix which will tell the
>
While on the topic of rsyslogd, I have v8.16.0 and use these two lines
in rsyslogd.conf to get datetime -MM-DD HH:MM:SS formatting:
$template
CustomFormat,"%timegenerated:::date-year%-%timegenerated:::date-month%-%timegenerated:::date-day%
%timegenerated:
::date-hour%:%timegenerated:::date
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, you can set "-o {smtpd_reject_footer = text... }" in master.cf,
I seem to recall that the OP is using Postfix 2.11 which does not
have that feature. :-(
As for smtpd_reject_footer it is expanded via smtpd_expand_lookup()
which
On 27 Apr 2018, at 2:50, si5 wrote:
We want to find an official document for postfix which will tell the
maximum
load capacities for postfix mail server. We tried to search for it but
we
could only find performance test research papers.
Actually we have made few changes in postfix source code
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 7:48 AM, si5 wrote:
>
> Yeah, it is correct. But actually we don't want a precise prediction. We
> just want like ---> after the development of any server, some maximum load
> statistics must be made. And we want to make an analogous statistics for our
> case.
There is no
si5:
> >>May I suggest: you test the modified code and the unmodified code
> >>and then try to explain why one is better than the other.
>
> >>Wietse
>
> Yes we have tested unmodified code with spirent(200,000 mails per 10
> minutes) and drops were very less.
That's 300/s, a performance
Viktor Dukhovni:
>
>
> > On Apr 27, 2018, at 6:53 AM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> > Meanwhile, you can set "-o {smtpd_reject_footer = text... }" in master.cf,
>
> I seem to recall that the OP is using Postfix 2.11 which does not
> have that feature. :-(
>
> As for smtpd_reject_footer it is exp
On 27 Apr 2018, at 2:50, si5 wrote:
> We want to find an official document for postfix which will tell the
> maximum
> load capacities for postfix mail server. We tried to search for it but
> we
> could only find performance test research papers.
>
> Actually we have made few changes in postfix
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 7:48 AM, si5 wrote:
>
> Yeah, it is correct. But actually we don't want a precise prediction. We
> just want like ---> after the development of any server, some maximum load
> statistics must be made. And we want to make an analogous statistics for
> our
>
On 27 April 2018 at 08:57, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> 2018-04-27 8:22 GMT+02:00 Dominic Raferd :
>>
>> I have always received a number of warning messages (from
>> postfix/smtpd) stating 'TLS library problem' in my mail logs and I
>> think they are always followed by a dropped incoming connection.
Wietse Venema wrote
> si5:
>> >>May I suggest: you test the modified code and the unmodified code
>> >>and then try to explain why one is better than the other.
>>
>> >>Wietse
>>
>> Yes we have tested unmodified code with spirent(200,000 mails per 10
>> minutes) and drops were very less.
> On Apr 27, 2018, at 2:22 AM, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>
> $ grep -a "warning: TLS library problem" /var/log/mail.log.1
> /var/log/mail.log|grep -o "error:.*"|sort|uniq -c|sort -nr
> 12 error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
> number:s3_pkt.c:362:
> 11 error:1408A10B:SS
17 matches
Mail list logo