Now is ok but I would like to know where this setting should be set
according to rules - master.cf or main.cf?
2018-04-17 16:24 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema :
> Poliman - Serwis:
> > Yes, you have right but this is already fixed. In postfix's config files
> is
> > clear and setting works nice. But I a
Poliman - Serwis:
> Now is ok but I would like to know where this setting should be set
> according to rules - master.cf or main.cf?
smtp_bind_address, smtp_bind_address6
In main.cf if this setting applies to the majority of SMTP clients.
In master.cf if this setting applies to a minority of SMT
Thank you for answer. How to detect that some is major or minor smtp client?
2018-04-18 12:57 GMT+02:00 Wietse Venema :
> Poliman - Serwis:
> > Now is ok but I would like to know where this setting should be set
> > according to rules - master.cf or main.cf?
>
> smtp_bind_address, smtp_bind_addre
thanks for your help.
regards.
El 17/04/18 a las 15:01, Phil Stracchino escribió:
On 04/17/18 13:53, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Apr 17, 2018, at 1:39 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote:
In a Perl-compatible regular expression, you want something like this:
/.{,64}(your linked profile)/
Which (whe
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin, in
the master.cf file
I think the "cleanup" process is responsible for the excessive use of cpu.
ps f
Hi all.
We have 2 domain managed by postfix.
When I send an email to an not existing user in the first donain I got back
an email user unknown.while if I send it to the second domain I don't
receive anything.
Any issue/clue on this?
Thanks
--
*Alfredo*
You will get more help if you provide helpful info.
http://www.postfix.org/DEBUG_README.html#mail
-ANGELO FAZZINA
ITS Service Manager:
Spam and Virus Prevention
Mass Mailing
G Suite/Gmail
ang...@uconn.edu
University of Connecticut, ITS, SSG, Server Systems
860-486-9075
From: owner-postfix-us
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 04:15:19PM +0200, Alfredo De Luca wrote:
> We have 2 domain managed by postfix.
>
> When I send an email to an not existing user in the first donain I
> got back an email user unknown...
"User unknown in virtual mailbox table" means the domain was found in
virtual_mailbox
On 18.04.18 11:00, Emanuel wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin,
in the master.cf file
46 IPs? why?
I think the "cleanup" process
Thanks guys. I ll provide more info later.
I checked on my configuration and we have the following for the
virtual_mailbox_maps:
virtual_mailbox_maps = regexp:$config_directory/domain_rewriting
ldap:$config_directory/ldap-virtual-maps.cf
**
/^(.*)@mydomain1.com$/${1}@mydomain2.it
**
*http:/
El 18/04/18 a las 12:03, Matus UHLAR - fantomas escribió:
On 18.04.18 11:00, Emanuel wrote:
Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin,
in the m
Emanuel:
[ Charset windows-1252 converted... ]
> Hello everyone, I'm representing a performance problem on my server.
>
> I explain in detail the configuration of my server.
>
> I am using postfix with 46 IPs configured as a mta, with round-robin, in
> the master.cf file
>
> I think the "cleanu
*HSBC Spearphishing Campaign Sinkhole*
You may have received an email with the title "FW: Your HSBC application
documents" by "luke.g...@business-hsbc.co.uk" or
"luke.g...@hsbcmail.co.uk". If you have done so, then this was not an
legitimate email by HSBC bank and instead was what's known as an
"p
Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
Postfix configuration:
default_process_limit = 300
smtpd_client_connection_count_limit = 2000
smtpd_recipient_limit = 20
Any information you give me is helpful.
El 18/04/18 a las 14:00, Wietse Venema escribió:
Limit the number of processe
Emanuel:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
I have not seen evidence that the cleanup daemon is responsible for
a performance issue. Absent meaningful info, no support.
Wietse
> On Apr 18, 2018, at 2:51 PM, Emanuel wrote:
>
> smtpd_recipient_limit = 20
RFC5321 requires at least 100. Unnecessarily splitting the envelope does not
help performance.
--
Viktor.
Emanuel writes:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
Yes.
I recently tried to load the malware patrol header check list, which has
49349 lines as a regexp body check, and I quickly had to stop doing that
because the resource usage of the machine quickly went into a state
where
Am 18.04.2018 um 20:51 schrieb Emanuel:
> Can the files header/body_checks generate overload?
If you have many header/body_checks you'll see a higher usage of the
cleanup process in tools like "top".
You can save a lot of cpu ressources if you use...
...pcre instead of regexp (mostly the syntax
On 19 April 2018 at 07:21, Peer Heinlein wrote:
>
> You can save a lot of cpu ressources if you use...
>
> ...pcre instead of regexp (mostly the syntax is the same, but the engine
> is better, just change the prefix!)
Check if supported with:
# postconf -m|grep pcre
pcre
If using the standard po
19 matches
Mail list logo
