Hi Noel,
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 10:18 PM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> ** Is Postfix logging that ETRN is disabled on the first, unencrypted SMTP
>> session and then logging this again for the encrypted session (ie: Postfix
>> is just logging I disabled this and Google is not attempting to issue ETRN
>
Hi John,
> On Feb 27, 2018, at 3:25 PM, John Fawcett wrote:
> I can't think of a compelling reason either to enable VRFY or to disable
> it. Disabling it stops people abusing it, but then they can just use
> RCPT TO to get the same information in most cases. I disabled it since I
> can't see any
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
Reading docs still it seems smtpd_tls_session_cache_database can be
useful. What is behavior when its empty(default)?
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
>
> I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you shouldn't
> set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see anything in the docs
> now.
You're better of without it, because session tickets do the job
better.
> Readin
Right now and for at least the last 24hours+ gmail IPs are on SORBS.
Good, I don't mind. However, it's causing Gmail to hit after-220 deep
protocol tests in postscreen and this causes long delays because Gmail
rotates sending IPs.
I scroe dnsbl.sorbs.net 2 points. dnswl.org:
list.dnswl.org=12
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
You're better of without it, because session t
On 2018-03-01 04:49, MRob wrote:
On 2018-03-01 04:42, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:35 PM, MRob wrote:
I thought I had read somewhere that modern versions of Postfix you
shouldn't set up smtpd_tls_session_cache_database but I can't see
anything in the docs now.
You're bette
> On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
>
> OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
> smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
--
Viktor.
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:14 AM, MRob wrote:
>
> If I was useing smtpd_tls_session_cache_database does it disable session
> tickets?
No, but it wastes space on the server, caching sessions the client is unlikely
to use.
> BTW, are smtpd session tickets shared along multi-instances?
No. Nor s
On 2018-03-01 05:16, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Feb 28, 2018, at 11:49 PM, MRob wrote:
OK thanks Victor a lot. Does that mean I should also remove
smtp_tls_session_cache_database?
NO.
I typoed in my last email (YES/NO), so anyways I think I understand
thanks to your time taken to do some e
Hello
I have have create any acceslist to deny, but if check me situation this
will conntecd successfuly to me maschine
But i think this way need to negotiat, but styl not working correct, thanks
for any help !
Regard
Mauri
Postfix 2.11.3
# cat /etc/postfix/access | grep 103.233.193
On March 1, 2018 6:42:17 AM GMT+01:00, Maurizio Caloro
wrote:
>Hello
>
>I have have create any acceslist to deny, but if check me situation
>this
>will conntecd successfuly to me maschine
>
>But i think this way need to negotiat, but styl not working correct,
>thanks
>for any help !
>
>
>
>Re
> On Mar 1, 2018, at 12:42 AM, Maurizio Caloro wrote:
>
> I have have create any acceslist to deny, but if check me situation this will
> conntecd successfuly to me maschine
Postfix access lists control email delivery not connection
establishment. To control connection establishment use a
fi
13 matches
Mail list logo
