I don't know what response is given to the sending client when postfix
puts an incoming mail into the hold queue, say because of an access
table HOLD action.
At the time of actioning the hold, is sender told the mail has been
delivered (250), or something else - or is no response given at all?
Is
Hi,
Sometimes when server is busy Postfix does not write all the data to
maillog. I see difference between data from maillog and content of file
with data in format: Date --From email --To email
It's seems that drops some info before writing to maillog i.e. maillog
does not contain every activity
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:17:25AM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
> I don't know what response is given to the sending client when postfix
> puts an incoming mail into the hold queue, say because of an access
> table HOLD action.
> At the time of actioning the hold, is sender told the mail has been
>
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:19:39PM +0200, Sohin Vyacheslav wrote:
> Sometimes when server is busy Postfix does not write all the data to
> maillog.
Postfix does never write directly to the maillog. This is delegated to
your syslog server. If this one drops messages you have to fix it.
>
On 24 January 2018 at 10:52, Bastian Blank
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 10:17:25AM +, Dominic Raferd wrote:
>> I don't know what response is given to the sending client when postfix
>> puts an incoming mail into the hold queue, say because of an access
>> table HOLD action.
>> At the time
24.01.2018 12:54, Bastian Blank пишет:
> On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:19:39PM +0200, Sohin Vyacheslav wrote:
>> Sometimes when server is busy Postfix does not write all the data to
>> maillog.
>
> Postfix does never write directly to the maillog. This is delegated to
> your syslog server. If thi
24.01.2018 12:54, Bastian Blank пишет:
>> I see difference between data from maillog and content of file
>> with data in format: Date --From email --To email
> I have no idea what you are telling me. Postfix does not log the
> contents ot the From or To headers.
>
in master.cf exists
On Wed, January 24, 2018 9:34 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> and a few seconds later STARTTLS succeeds, and that IP successfully sends
> mail from user hr@ to 10 recipients.
>
> Are there many users on that same IP via a NAT?
Noel,
just noticed I do NOT have that IP entered in 'mynetworks =', it used t
Sohin Vyacheslav:
> Hi,
>
> Sometimes when server is busy Postfix does not write all the data to
> maillog. I see difference between data from maillog and content of file
> with data in format: Date --From email --To email
>
> It's seems that drops some info before writing to maillog i.e. maillog
Anvar Kuchkartaev:
> Hello,
>
> I am configuring postfix send only mail server with 2x sending domain
> lets say mail.domain1.com and mail.domain2.com. I have configured almost
If you want multiple mail sending and receiving personalities, see
http://www.postfix.org/MULTI_INSTANCE_README.html
On Wed, January 24, 2018 9:34 am, Noel Jones wrote:
and a few seconds later STARTTLS succeeds, and that IP successfully sends
mail from user hr@ to 10 recipients.
Are there many users on that same IP via a NAT?
On 24.01.18 22:50, Voytek wrote:
just noticed I do NOT have that IP entered in 'my
24.01.2018 13:56, Wietse Venema пишет:
> As others have pointed out, Postfix does not write syslog files.
> Depending on your OS, logging is handled by system-effing-d, which
> by default unhelpfully rate-limits logging.
i.e. need to adjust systemd logging settings?
--
Vyacheslav
Wietse:
> As others have pointed out, Postfix does not write syslog files.
> Depending on your OS, logging is handled by system-effing-d, which
> by default unhelpfully rate-limits logging.
Sohin Vyacheslav:
> i.e. need to adjust systemd logging settings?
Unfortunately, systemd is not part of Pos
24.01.2018 14:06, Wietse Venema пишет:
>> i.e. need to adjust systemd logging settings?
> Unfortunately, systemd is not part of Postfix. Fortunately, there
> are excellent web search engines that can help you find the answer.
it's seems that rsyslogd writes a postfix log:
$ sudo lsof /var/log/ma
On 01/24/2018 02:54 AM, Bastian Blank wrote:
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 12:19:39PM +0200, Sohin Vyacheslav wrote:
Sometimes when server is busy Postfix does not write all the data to
maillog.
Postfix does never write directly to the maillog. This is delegated to
your syslog server. If this one d
On 22/01/2018 3:52 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
>
>> On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Danny Horne wrote:
>>
>> Private CA sounds interesting, will have to read up about it
> You can get away with a lot less complexity than the usual OpenSSL CA.
> See, for example:
>
>
> https://raw.githubuserconten
On 1/24/2018 5:50 AM, Voytek wrote:
> On Wed, January 24, 2018 9:34 am, Noel Jones wrote:
>
>> and a few seconds later STARTTLS succeeds, and that IP successfully sends
>> mail from user hr@ to 10 recipients.
>>
>> Are there many users on that same IP via a NAT?
>
> Noel,
>
> just noticed I do N
24.01.2018 15:34, Stephen Satchell пишет:
> My colleague found that there is a rate-limit parameter in the
> implementation of syslog we were using, and he was exceeding that limit.
> It's a knob you can turn.
>
> http://www.rsyslog.com/changing-the-settings/
Thank you, Stephen I hope it will
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:21 AM, Danny Horne wrote:
>
>> You can get away with a lot less complexity than the usual OpenSSL CA.
>> See, for example:
>>
>>
>> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/openssl/openssl/master/test/certs/mkcert.sh
>>
>> which creates certificates via "openssl x509 -req"
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Danny Horne wrote:
On 22/01/2018 3:52 pm, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
On Jan 22, 2018, at 10:06 AM, Danny Horne wrote:
Private CA sounds interesting, will have to read up about it
You can get away with a lot less complexity than the usual OpenSSL CA.
See, for example:
h
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 11:37 AM, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>
> 1) Create a new CA (only once - it is a good idea to add a date in name, in
> case you have to change it later):
> openssl req -new -x509 -nodes -subj
> '/C=DE/ST=Germany/L=Berlin/O=Company/CN=Company Root Certificate
> 2018/emailAddres
On Wed, 24 Jan 2018, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
One one want to start with "umask 077", to avoid creating
world-readable private key files. This should not be
necessary with OpenSSL 1.1.0 and later, but older versions
(e.g. OpenSSL 1.0.2) create all output files with default
permissions, constraine
Hello,
I would like to ask what is the best web gui to manage mass mailing with
postfix?
Any advices greatly appreciated.
Anvar
--
Sent from: http://postfix.1071664.n5.nabble.com/Postfix-Users-f2.html
On Wed, Jan 24, 2018, at 08:37, Dirk Stöcker wrote:
>
> It's not sooo complicated:
The length of your message contradicts that statement.
(These days I recommend https://github.com/square/certstrap because it's
easily scripted. I'm currently using it in several ansible playbooks,
for example.)
On 24/01/18 19:32, john wrote:
> Is there a write up of how to setup up postscreen for maximum spam control.
Of course there's the official docs, POSTSCREEN_README and
postscreen(8). I also recommend this:
http://rob0.nodns4.us/postscreen.html
Peter
On Thu, January 25, 2018 2:58 am, Noel Jones wrote:
> Instead of adding them to mynetworks, add that IP (and any other
> remote offices) to smtpd_client_event_limit_exceptions.
On Wed, January 24, 2018 10:59 pm, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> submission service usually does not use mynetworks.
postfix/smtpd[14755]: warning: TLS library problem: error:140760FC:SSL
routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:640:
Should I be blocking some encryption method? I thought openssl dropped
support for the hackable protocols.
> On Jan 24, 2018, at 9:25 PM, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
>
> postfix/smtpd[14755]: warning: TLS library problem: error:140760FC:SSL
> routines:SSL23_GET_CLIENT_HELLO:unknown protocol:s23_srvr.c:640:
>
> Should I be blocking some encryption method? I thought openssl dropped
> support for the h
28 matches
Mail list logo
