Hi
This isn't related directly postfix but i could not find true platform to
ask. I believe your knowledge is far better than mine and i need little
help.
We are having difficulties while delivering mails to Microsoft's domains
like hotmail and outlook. I've checked over and over again my settings
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 10:49, jin&hitman&Barracuda wrote:
>
> We are having difficulties while delivering mails to Microsoft's domains like
> hotmail and outlook.
They appear to have a DNS problem which is causing outbound mail to fail. Their
SMTP servers are using non-existent hostnames when
I did not realize that nonexist host names. I believe they basically ignore
faults when they produce them but they keep pushing us to follow their
requirements.
On 16 Jan 2018 1:59 p.m., "Jim Reid" wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2018, at 10:49, jin&hitman&Barracuda
wrote:
>
> We are having difficulties w
i am also having problems delivering to microsoft domains since sunday.
i am in their SDNS program and it doesn't show our domain as being
blacklisted.
i contacted their engineers via
https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/getsupport?oaspworkflow=start_1.0.0.0&wfname=capsub&productkey=edfsmsbl3&lo
Please do not top-post on this mailing list...
On 16 January 2018 at 11:20, jin&hitman&Barracuda wrote:
>
> I did not realize that nonexist host names. I believe they basically ignore
> faults when they produce them but they keep pushing us to follow their
> requirements.
>
>
> On 16 Jan 2018 1
I've performed same situation. Actually they responded me with "Sorry, your
ip do not qualify for mitigation." It doesn't help me either.
On 16 Jan 2018 2:23 p.m., "Matthew Broadhead" <
matthew.broadh...@nbmlaw.co.uk> wrote:
> i am also having problems delivering to microsoft domains since sund
On 16 Jan 2018 2:34 p.m., "Dominic Raferd" wrote:
Please do not top-post on this mailing list...
On 16 January 2018 at 11:20, jin&hitman&Barracuda
wrote:
>
> I did not realize that nonexist host names. I believe they basically
ignore faults when they produce them but they keep pushing us to fol
Running postfix-3.2.4 on Slackware-14.2. My server and workstation are on
the same host. Yesterday, about mid-day, messages to me stopped being
delivered to my INBOX. /var/spool/mail shows:
-rw-rw 1 rshepard mail 207100 Jan 15 12:30 /var/spool/mail/rshepard
Messages from mail lists are d
On 1/16/2018 9:50 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Running postfix-3.2.4 on Slackware-14.2. My server and workstation
> are on
> the same host. Yesterday, about mid-day, messages to me stopped being
> delivered to my INBOX. /var/spool/mail shows:
>
> -rw-rw 1 rshepard mail 207100 Jan 15 12:30 /var/
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Noel Jones wrote:
Pick one message and follow it through the logs. If postfix fails or
misdirects the message, postfix will log what happened. If the message
makes it through postfix and is handed off to procmail, then that's where
the problem is.
Noel,
Aw, I should hav
On 01/12/2018 06:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
>> $ ls -l ssl/
>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Nov 4 13:04 cacerts -> ../../ssl/certs/
> The above is not needed, if you configure Postfix to read the system
> SSL certificate database with "tls_append_default_CA = yes". Not a
> good idea if you use cer
> On Jan 16, 2018, at 12:35 PM, James Moe wrote:
>
>>> $ ls -l ssl/
>>> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Nov 4 13:04 cacerts -> ../../ssl/certs/
>> The above is not needed, if you configure Postfix to read the system
>> SSL certificate database with "tls_append_default_CA = yes". Not a
>> good idea i
Hi,
I have a question about the “Mailing List” section in the VIRTUAL_README [1].
The third paragraph states:
“This example assumes that in main.cf, $myorigin is listed under the
mydestination parameter setting...”
Because the mailing list is being set up with virtual hosting, doesn’t t
Hi,
I have two questions about the “Autoreplies” section in the VIRTUAL_README [1].
If I was setting up auto replies for the virtually hosted domain of
“example.com”, would the correct configuration be:
/etc/postfix/main.cf
virtual_alias_maps = hash:/etc/postfix/virtual
tran
On 1/16/2018 10:32 AM, Rich Shepard wrote:
> Jan 16 05:54:55 salmo postfix/smtpd[23648]: warning: connect to
> Milter service inet:127.0.0.1:8891: Connection refused
This probably isn't related to your delivery problems, but whatever
miler you've configured at :8891 isn't running. Most likely th
On Tue, 16 Jan 2018, Noel Jones wrote:
This probably isn't related to your delivery problems, but whatever miler
you've configured at :8891 isn't running. Most likely the service is down.
Noel,
That was added by me last November as I added SPF and openDKIM to postfix.
The latter starts and
Hi,
I am looking to use either Cyrus or Dovecot for both SASL authentication and
IMAP. While Postfix 3.1.0 supports both, I was wondering which to prefer if
security is my most important deciding factor ? Does one have a better track
record than the other ?
Thanks,
- J
> I am looking to use either Cyrus or Dovecot for both SASL authentication and
> IMAP. While Postfix 3.1.0 supports both, I was wondering which to prefer if
> security is my most important deciding factor ? Does one have a better track
> record than the other ?
They are both quite secure, I c
James Moe:
Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE
-- Start of PGP signed section.
> On 01/12/2018 06:27 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
> >
> >> $ ls -l ssl/
> >> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Nov 4 13:04 cacerts -> ../../ssl/certs/
> > The above is not needed, if you configure Postfix to read the syst
* J Doe :
> I am looking to use either Cyrus or Dovecot for both SASL authentication and
> IMAP. While Postfix 3.1.0 supports both, I was wondering which to prefer if
> security is my most important deciding factor ? Does one have a better
> track record than the other ?
The Cyrus SASL project h
20 matches
Mail list logo
