On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report
> in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked
> in orange...
This is a DMARC report from Gmail and so a more appropriate place to
ask
We're very happy with sogo. (https://sogo.nu/)
MJ
On 12/27/2017 08:40 AM, Philip Paeps wrote:
On 2017-12-27 13:08:44 (+1030), Mal wrote:
Interested to hear from those running a Postfix(MTA)/Dovecot(IMAP)
combo on what contacts & calendar server projects they are having
success with.
I run N
Hai,
Kopano with nextcloud, z-push and webapp with files plugin rules here.
Very good combo, bit harder to setup, but very compatible with lots of
different devices.
Greetz,
Louis
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: li...@merit.unu.edu
> [mailto:owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org] Nam
On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:37:24 +
Dominic Raferd wrote:
> On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis
> wrote:
> > I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I
> > got report in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has
> > dkim failed - marked in orange...
>
On 27.12.2017 08:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. Today I got report
> in xml on my mailbox. Attached. One from addresses has dkim failed - marked
> in orange. What that means and how to fix it? I use ubuntu 16.04 lts and
> postfix:
Judging fro
On 27 December 2017 at 10:06, li...@lazygranch.com wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017 09:37:24 +
> Dominic Raferd wrote:
>> ... DMARC reports from mail providers are very useful in checking for
>> problems with spf/dkim/dmarc before one moves to p=reject. Consider
>> using one of the services that
Le 12/27/17 à 03:38, Mal a écrit :
> Greetings..
>
> Interested to hear from those running a Postfix(MTA)/Dovecot(IMAP) combo
> on what contacts & calendar server projects they are having success with.
>
> Mal
I use nextcloud as contact & calendar server.
Hi Wietse,
Thank you for your answer.
The docker containers are running Debian 9.3 and the postfix package
from the official Debian repository (Version: 3.1.6-0+deb9u1).
As you can see below the source code still contains calls to
gethostbyname():
postfix-3.1.6~ fgrep gethostbyname . -R -
Am 27.12.2017 um 03:38 schrieb Mal:
> Greetings..
>
> Interested to hear from those running a Postfix(MTA)/Dovecot(IMAP) combo
> on what contacts & calendar server projects they are having success with.
>
> Mal
>
Hi,
We have Horde, flavor "webmail edition".
https://www.horde.org/apps/webmail
T
Kolab - by default it is using Cyrus IMAP, not Dovecot. SMTP server is
Postfix by default. Supports *dav, ActiveSync. Roundcube as webmail.
Liutauras
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Erwan David wrote:
> Le 12/27/17 à 03:38, Mal a écrit :
> > Greetings..
> >
> > Interested to hear from those ru
Hi,
We have Postfix 2.6.6 on Redhat. I installed open-spf , open-dmarc , and
dkim. I think everything is fine, but we have e-mail spoofing :(
how can i correct this ?
thanks in advance
Received-SPF: pass (spf2.spf.guru: Sender is authorized to use
'bounces+3150432-2a15-user=dom...@spf2.spf.guru
Where can I get up-to-date Postfix installation RPMs?
Thanks, Larry
Larry M. Rosenbaum
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Lorenzo Bernardi:
> Hi Wietse,
>
> Thank you for your answer.
>
> The docker containers are running Debian 9.3 and the postfix package
> from the official Debian repository (Version: 3.1.6-0+deb9u1).
>
> As you can see below the source code still contains calls to
> gethostbyname():
Grep does
Thank you Wietse,
I followed your advice and ran a strace on the smtpd process.
Postfix is running in a chroot environment (/var/spool/postfix) and I
noticed the following:
Dec 27 16:55:05 85b8d58a343c root: open("/etc/resolv.conf",
O_RDONLY|O_CLOEXEC) = 18
Dec 27 16:55:05 85b8d58a343c root:
On 27/12/2017 4:34 μμ, Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
Where can I get up-to-date Postfix installation RPMs?
I would suggest you to use GhettoForge repo
(http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Main_Page);
See packages: http://ghettoforge.org/index.php/Postfix3
Cheers,
Nick
Lorenzo Bernardi:
> It looks like "libnss_dns.so.2" cannot be found due to the chrooted
> environment and thus no DNS query can be made (at least for this
> specific call).
> I fixed it by copying the libraries from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ to
> /var/spool/postfix/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/:
>
> > cp
Per security policy i am not allowed to use sources besides redhats...
I do build postfix from source using the specs file available in fedora
repo.
It is simple, just install rpbmuild grab the tar.gz file and rename
everything in the spec file to match your distro.
Build with rpbmuild -ba pos
Hi All -
Here's our scenario.
Migrating from server A to server B. Server A is a proprietary system that uses
LDAP queries for delivering email. Server B is a Postfix system configured to
deliver email using LDAP queries, mirroring as closely as possible, Server A.
In testing, the Postfix serv
> On Dec 27, 2017, at 5:15 PM, l carr wrote:
>
> What we would like to do, as a transitional state, is mimic the Sendmail
> failover relay to re-direct undeliverable email from the Postfix system to
> Server A. With Server A only handling emails redirected to it from the
> Postfix server, th
On 28/12/17 07:54, flowhosts wrote:
> Per security policy i am not allowed to use sources besides redhats...
That's understandable.
> I do build postfix from source using the specs file available in fedora
> repo.
> It is simple, just install rpbmuild grab the tar.gz file and rename
> everything
The domains are not defined under mydestination, they are defined under
virtual_alias_domains. So it sounds like the fallback_transport may not work
for us. Is there any other way to accomplish that same scenario?
=lc
From: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org on
l carr:
> The domains are not defined under mydestination, they are defined
> under virtual_alias_domains. So it sounds like the fallback_transport
> may not work for us. Is there any other way to accomplish that
> same scenario?
That depends on what you mean with 'undeliverable'. Which Postfix
de
> On Dec 27, 2017, at 8:42 PM, l carr wrote:
>
> The domains are not defined under mydestination, they are defined under
> virtual_alias_domains. So it sounds like the fallback_transport may not
> work for us. Is there any other way to accomplish that same scenario?
Just change move the domain
All is clear but how setup dmarc per IP address of the server if dmarc is
based on spf and dkim which are based on particular domain?
2017-12-27 10:37 GMT+01:00 Dominic Raferd :
> On 27 December 2017 at 07:22, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> > I configured yesterday spf, dkim, dmarc for example.com. T
For particular domain from report dkim works well. I checked it here
http://dkimcore.org/c/keycheck. Mails from this domain are sent by
s1.domain.net server. Should be dkim configured for domain name of the
server which corresponds to IP mentioned earlier?
2017-12-28 7:46 GMT+01:00 Poliman - Serwi
On 27 December 2017 at 13:31, Selcuk Yazar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We have Postfix 2.6.6 on Redhat. I installed open-spf , open-dmarc , and
> dkim. I think everything is fine, but we have e-mail spoofing :(
>
> how can i correct this ?
>
> thanks in advance
>
> Received-SPF: pass (spf2.spf.guru: Sender i
Please bottom post on this list (and see below)
On 28 December 2017 at 07:05, Poliman - Serwis wrote:
> For particular domain from report dkim works well. I checked it here
> http://dkimcore.org/c/keycheck. Mails from this domain are sent by
> s1.domain.net server. Should be dkim configured for d
27 matches
Mail list logo
