Hi,
I get a panic in my logs:
postfix/master[22933]: daemon started -- version 3.2.2, configuration
/etc/postfix
postfix/postscreen[22945]: CONNECT from [A.B.C.D]:X to [E.F.G.H]:25
postfix/dnsblog[22947]: panic: dns_query: bad length -1 (h_errno=Unknown
error 0)
postfix/dnsblog[22946]: pan
On 17 Dec 2017, at 10:16, Ron Guerin wrote:
> On 12/17/2017 12:15 AM, @lbutlr wrote:
>> Are there any config changes that need to be made in postfix when moving
>> from mysql to MariaDB 10.0?
>>
>
> No, but be aware, I've done 3 conversions now on Debian and none of them has
> gone correctly.
triaxx:
> postfix/postscreen[22945]: CONNECT from [A.B.C.D]:X to [E.F.G.H]:25
> postfix/dnsblog[22947]: panic: dns_query: bad length -1 (h_errno=Unknown
> error 0)
> ...
> The problem also occurs with 3.2.4. Since I can read this comment, I
> suppose a bug:
> /*
> * Future proofing
Hi, anyone can help me?
De: owner-postfix-us...@postfix.org em nome
de luistkd4
Enviado: quarta-feira, 6 de dezembro de 2017 21:30:23
Para: postfix-users@postfix.org
Assunto: Re: Bounce message with transport_maps
>>and stop accepting mail via SMTP that has an
Wietse Venema:
> triaxx:
> > postfix/postscreen[22945]: CONNECT from [A.B.C.D]:X to [E.F.G.H]:25
> > postfix/dnsblog[22947]: panic: dns_query: bad length -1 (h_errno=Unknown
> > error 0)
> > ...
> > The problem also occurs with 3.2.4. Since I can read this comment, I
> > suppose a bug:
> >
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:21:56 +0200
A Debian User wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am currently having trouble to get postfix running in a Docker
> Container.
>
> Docker requires a Process to stay alive and in foreground at ID 1, if
> not the container dies.
I don't know much about Docker, but would it be
Dennis Carr:
> On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 21:21:56 +0200
> A Debian User wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am currently having trouble to get postfix running in a Docker
> > Container.
> >
> > Docker requires a Process to stay alive and in foreground at ID 1, if
> > not the container dies.
>
> I don't kn
> On Dec 18, 2017, at 9:09 PM, Wietse Venema wrote:
>
> The Docker approach complicates Postfix multi-instance support so
> we may have to forego that. What remains is to determine that Docker
> shutdown, i.e. yanking the container from under a running Postfix
> system, will be no worse than an
