Re: Questions about mynetworks_style parameter in main.cf

2017-10-03 Thread Peter
On 03/10/17 16:31, Viktor Dukhovni wrote: > Various platforms support newer, cleaner APIs to the same ends. > The documentation of mynetworks_style may be a bit out of date, > Postfix may well by now be able to find secondary IP addresses > of interfaces, even when not associated with a separate lo

ACL permission to move into different folder

2017-10-03 Thread Davide Marchi
Hi friends, I've set ACL for two user (two primary email address, no alias), where these users must not be able to delete email from imap server. Now I would like to add (from the client) the ability to move any incoming mail into different directory, if possible into an existing directory chos

how to reject disabled LDAP users

2017-10-03 Thread Ivars Strazdiņš
Hi,our postfix mail server is FreeIPA client. What this means is that user accounts are kept on a separate FreeIPA server, but they are real linux accounts on the mail server. "id" and "getent passwd" commands work on mail server and return user id and group membership information. (FreeIPA is RedH

Re: ACL permission to move into different folder

2017-10-03 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/3/2017 7:33 AM, Davide Marchi wrote: > Hi friends, > I've set ACL for two user (two primary email address, no alias), > where these users must not be able to delete email from imap server. > Now I would like to add (from the client) the ability to move any > incoming mail into different direc

Re: Questions about mynetworks_style parameter in main.cf

2017-10-03 Thread J Doe
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Peter wrote: > >> On 03/10/17 09:09, J Doe wrote: >> In man I see that the “subnet” option for “mynetworks_style” is >> listed as being supported in Postfix < 3.0. Does this mean that >> post-Postfix 3.0 this option is deprecated ? > > The full line in the docs yo

Re: Questions about mynetworks_style parameter in main.cf

2017-10-03 Thread J Doe
> On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:31 PM, Viktor Dukhovni > wrote: > > >>> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:27 PM, Peter wrote: >>> >>> With ifconfig being deprecated on Linux, does that mean that network >>> settings specified with newer commands that replace ifconfig will not >>> work ? >> >> I'm not entirely s

Re: ACL permission to move into different folder

2017-10-03 Thread Davide Marchi
Il 2017-10-03 17:06 Noel Jones ha scritto: [..] This is the postfix users list. You'll probably get more help on the dovecot users list. -- Noel Jones Hoops, sorry to all! thanks

Re: how to reject disabled LDAP users

2017-10-03 Thread Bastien Durel
Le mardi 03 octobre 2017 à 18:24 +0530, Ivars Strazdiņš a écrit : > Hi, > our postfix mail server is FreeIPA client. What this means is that > user accounts are kept on a separate FreeIPA server, but they are > real linux accounts on the mail server. "id" and "getent passwd" > commands work on mail

Re: how to reject disabled LDAP users

2017-10-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Ivars Strazdiņš wrote: > > For example, if a message is sent to test.u...@example.net, then postfix does > LDAP lookup for mail attribute "test.u...@example.net" and deliver to "uid" > result attribute “testuser". If LDAP lookup fails, then postfix attempts to >

Re: How to fake Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR)?

2017-10-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On 10/2/2017 11:47 AM, Noel Jones wrote: Yes, for sure. Extra recipients will get a 4xx response. Note this may*severely* delay deliveries, depending on the sender's retry policy. If a message arrives with 100 recipients, the sender will need to retry 99 times, which will likely take a very lo

Re: How to fake Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR)?

2017-10-03 Thread Matus UHLAR - fantomas
On Oct 2, 2017, at 11:47 AM, Noel Jones wrote: Note this may *severely* delay deliveries, depending on the sender's retry policy. If a message arrives with 100 recipients, the sender will need to retry 99 times, which will likely take a very long time. On 02.10.17 12:09, Viktor Dukhovni wrote

Re: How to fake Per-Recipient Data Responses (PRDR)?

2017-10-03 Thread Viktor Dukhovni
> On Oct 3, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote: > > Agreed. However I know one legitimate reason to do this: > accept spam on abuse@ mailbox (may be spam report), while refuse for others. Sure, you can indeed force mail to "abuse@" and/or "postmaster@" into a separate envelope from

Skip AV scan for outbound email

2017-10-03 Thread Jon LaBadie
I collect spam emails and submit them in batches to a group that works to reduce spam. I'm running the combination of postfix, amavisd-new, clamav, and spamassassin. Some of the batches of spam contain viruses and when amavisd scans them my submission is blocked and quarantined. Is there a way t

Re: Skip AV scan for outbound email

2017-10-03 Thread Noel Jones
On 10/3/2017 2:12 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > I collect spam emails and submit them in batches to > a group that works to reduce spam. I'm running the > combination of postfix, amavisd-new, clamav, and > spamassassin. Some of the batches of spam contain > viruses and when amavisd scans them my submi

Re: Skip AV scan for outbound email

2017-10-03 Thread Jon LaBadie
On Tue, Oct 03, 2017 at 03:21:13PM -0500, Noel Jones wrote: > On 10/3/2017 2:12 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > > I collect spam emails and submit them in batches to > > a group that works to reduce spam. I'm running the > > combination of postfix, amavisd-new, clamav, and > > spamassassin. Some of the